| |||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars
A bad bout of the blame game.,
By Alex (College Park, MD) - See all my reviews
This review is from: At Issue Series - Violent Children (paperback edition) (Hardcover)
This slim volume of "At Issue" targets a crisis that is as urgent as it is complex - juvenile violence and its contributing factors. The book adopts a pro-con dichotomy to illustrate the varied opinions on the subject. However, this style quickly degenerates into a clash of liberal and conservative ideologies. Ultimately, the "dual" expository approach conceals more information that it reveals, as the articles' authors cite increasingly ludicrous "evidence" to hammer in their dubious assertions.Consider, for instance, Robert W. Lee's "The Availability of Guns Does Not Contribute to Violent Behavior in Children." What, not at all? Lee cites a handful of "positive" cases, where the guns are used for self-defense, and bluntly ignores cases of the opposite. His closing argument is a Confederate victory at the cost of armed 15-year-olds' lives. Admire Wade F. Horn's "Fatherlessness Contributes to Juvenile Violence" article, which poses religion as the ultimate tool in parental authority. He proceeds to "trace" the exact "road" children take from upright to promiscuous. Next he rigidly defines both parents' roles - with father as the "hands-on" authority of risks and punishment. This isn't controversy - this is simple poor taste! The articles originate from several backgrounds: academic, testimonial, media. Unfortunately, this is easy to divine only because of the spectrum of flaws each approach exhibits. The reader is faced with almost everything imaginable - from some articles' failure to organize raw statistical data in a useful manner, to others' dismissive nature (sorry, Mr. Males, but no matter how much I sympathize with your way of thinking, I cannot tolerate ignorance of basic facts). A few articles weren't subjected to a rigorous enough selection process, which leads to their lack of relevance and failure to address the task at hand (Tom Kalinske's article comes to mind). Several articles are obtuse exercises in showmanship - like Steven Barr's dramatic presentation of a videogame experience ("You can't get away!" the boy said with a maniacal sneer...). Lastly, we've all heard some of these arguments - namely, Joanne Cantor's "Television Contributes to Violent Behavior in Children", which is a flagrant case of the "we can build you" methodology, which denies children an active role in their own formative experience (though her "Momy, I'm Scared" is handy enough). Sadly, the editor never takes the time to sum up the basic known facts, and all articles cite them differently. Without some defined point of departure, this "At Issue" ultimately becomes a Rorschach test. Though designed to give the reader a passing familiarity with the subject, this volume only manages to communicate one thing - confusion.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|