14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An archaeological and historical perspective on Atlantis, April 13, 2001
This review is from: Atlantis Destroyed (Paperback)
Of all the books I've read on Atlantis, the most impressive (and the one with the most archaeological evidence) is Rodney Castleden's Atlantis Destroyed. Castleden also wrote The Making of Stonehenge, The Knossos Labyrinth, The Stonehenge People, Neolithic Britain, and Minoans: Life in Bronze Age Crete.
His basic argument is that Plato took a number of what he calls "pieces of identifiable proto-history" and wove them together into a contemporary commentary on the world. Castleden suggests that the basis of this is a faint memory of Minoan civilization. He points out what is often forgotten by those who take the Atlantis story literally, that for Plato it is Athens that is written about as a utopia, not Atlantis, Athens that is the "excellent land with well-tempered seasons."
He illuminates several puzzles that have misled many people, eg. Plato's comments about the Pillars of Hercules. This is often assumed to refer to the modern day features by that name, but in ancient Greece the term could have other meanings, eg it could refer to the two southward-pointing headlands on each side of the Gulf of Laconia. Thus the large island outside the pillars of Heracles would be Crete.
Castleden follows this with a very detailed discussion of the archaeology and geography of Minoan Crete and Thera and how that compares with Plato's tale. He goes into detail about how the story might have been transmitted to Plato and Plato's possible motives in writing the two essays. (He also mentions that there was a century older text by Hellanicus, of which only a small fragment survives, called 'Atlantis'!).
He suggests that the size of 'Atlantis' was distorted by a misreading of either Linear A or B numerals or hieratic or demotic copies made by Egyptian scribes sometime since the fifteenth century, multiplying dimensions by ten so that the Plain of Mesara, which would fit into Crete, became the size of the southern Aegean and Atlantis thus became too large to be in the Mediterranean. A similar problem changed the 900 years between the eruption of Thera and Solon's visit to Egypt to 9000 years. If this is the case it becomes much easier to reconcile the relatively accurate description Plato gives of bronze age Athens with the story of Atlantis (something usually ignored by those who take the Atlantis part of Plato's story literally).
What he is not arguing is that either Minoan Crete or Cyladic Thera was Atlantis. He is suggesting that instead Plato drew his story of Atlantis from proto-historical elements about both civilizations. He also suggests that Plato draws from Syracuse (eg the fortifications of Syracuse) and Sparta for both physical descriptions and some of his political commentary, writing circumspectly so as to avoid Socrates fate.
He provides a wealth of archaeological evidence and the book is generously sprinkled with sketches and photographs. He even goes into detailed points such as the fact that Santorini (destroyed by a massive volcanic eruption) has red, white and black rocks matching Plato's description of the building materials used in Atlantis.
Atlantis Destroyed is a must read for anyone interested in the possible historical background to the Atlantis story.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Atlantis Destroyed: the story of a story., April 8, 2000
For most of us the very word "Atlantis" conjures up the image of an ultra futuristic civilization fated to destroy itself and sink into the ocean. Sort of the Hollywood version. Certainly it is this version that inspires so many New Age thinkers to look for its remains throughout the world. A geologist would tell them that continents can't sink; they can be transgressed (by elevated sea levels) or depressed (by glaciers) but the density gradients among continental granites, oceanic basalts and the materials of the mantal prevent continents from sinking. For the historian working with Plato's tale, it represents a mystery. Mr. Castleden has followed the leads in this mystery and ultimately identified the island of Thera, modern Santorini, as the most likely candidate for the original inspiration for Plato's tale. Sometime during the 1500s BC (or according to others the 1700s BC) the volcano on this island is known to have collapsed causing an eruption that has been estimated by some to have been 100 times more violent than that on Krakatoa during the 19th Century AD. The civilization that was buried when much of the island was destroyed was quite advanced for the time. Although much of the data Castleden has amassed supports this identification, his ultimate thesis is that the story was reworked by Plato for his own purposes. Though it may have been a tale known to him from other sources, it became in Plato's hands, a parable. Castleden believes that Atlantis became a paradigm for the cities of Sicily and Athens during Plato's time. The book is an interesting and thorough treatment of the subject but can be tough going at times. I put it down several times before I really got into it enough to finish it--and kept checking to see how many pages were left to go!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
One of the best analyses of the Atlantis story, November 11, 2008
Rodney Castleden's book is one of the best on the market. Unlike so many others which take Platoe's account at face value, Castleden analyses Plato's motives for writing the story. He places its authorship in Sicily, at the time of the Sicilian-Carthaginian wars, and shows how the legendary story of Atlantis versus Athens is paralleled by the contemporary story of Carthage versus Syracuse. He further shows how a number of elements came together in the tale, including the loss of an Athenian garrison as a result of tidal waves just prior to his period during the Peloponnesian War. Finally he shows how the possibility of mistranscription of hieratic Egyptian number systems could have inflated the numbers used by Plato by a factor of 10.
My critique is that he does not go far enough at looking at the Egyptian point of view. The world encircling ocean, thought by the Greeks to the Oceanus (and equated with the Atlantic), was for the Egyptians the Mediterranean "Great Green". For them, an island bigger than Asia and Lybia would have been the European continent, of whom the ancient Egyptians were ignorant, as they believed Europe was really a chain of islands stretching from Asia to Africa (Cyprus, Crete, the Peloponnese, Southern Italy, Sicily, Corsica and Sardinia), who were the area from which came the "Peoples of the Sea", who did attack Egypt, unifying all of the peoples from the Etruscans and Libyans, and who were repelled from Athens of the Late Mycenaean time. This view would suggest that the Atlantis story was based upon an Egyptian original, possibly a version of the Harris Manuscript preserved in Sais. Pity that Castleden did not take this next step.
Otherwise well done.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
