Ask most Americans, and they'll tell you that presidential campaigns get dirtier and more negative with every election. But Emmett Buell and Lee Sigelman suggest that may not be as true as we think. From Jimmy Carter's use of "fear arousal" in attacking Ronald Reagan to George Bush's allusions to the "L word" to disparage Michael Dukakis's liberalism, Buell and Sigelman show how, over the last dozen elections, negativity may have been well publicized but hasn't increased-and that John Kennedy waged the most negative campaign of all. Buell and Sigelman focus on both presidential and vice-presidential nominees as sources and targets of attacks and also examine the actions of surrogate campaigners like the Swift Boat Vets. Drawing on the New York Times as a research base-more than 17,000 campaign statements extracted from nearly 11,000 news items-they provide a more comprehensive assessment of negativity than anything previously attempted. Beginning in 1960, Buell and Sigelman categorize campaigns according to their level of competitiveness-from runaways like 1964 to dead heats like 2000 and 2004-to demonstrate how candidates go negative as circumstances warrant or permit. They break down negativity into different components, showing who attacked whom, how frequently, on what issues, how they did it, and at what point in the campaign. They also compare their findings with previously published accounts of these campaigns-including first-hand accounts by candidates and their confidants. And, as an added bonus, each chapter features "echoes from the campaign trail" that reflect the invective exchanged by rival campaigns. Attack Politics pins down much about negative campaigning that has previously been speculated on but never subjected to such systematic research. It offers the best overview yet of modern presidential races and is must reading for anyone interested in the vagaries of those campaigns.
FREE Two-Day Shipping for students on millions of items. Learn more |
Book Description
Editorial Reviews
From the Back Cover
"In this remarkable book Buell and Sigelman provide not only the most systematic treatment of negative campaigning, but also the best account yet written of the development of the modern presidential campaign. Both political scientists and practitioners will want to have this work ready at hand in their library; it is the indispensable 'bible' on the subject."--James W. Ceaser, coauthor of Red over Blue: The 2004 Elections and American Politics
"This tour de force joins John Geer's In Defense of Negativity as a 'must read' for all scholars studying negative campaigns, but also for students of political communication, democratic deliberation, and campaign strategy more generally."--Richard Lau, author of Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Campaigns
About the Author
Emmett H. Buell Jr. is Richard G. Lugar Professor of Public Policy at Denison University and coeditor of Enduring Controversies in Presidential Nominating Politics. Lee Sigelman is Columbian Professor of Political Science at George Washington University and coeditor of Political Mythology and Popular Fiction and, with Buell, Nominating the President.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
|
There are no customer reviews yet.
|
|||
|
Video reviews
|
Front Cover | Front Flap | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Flap | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Inside This Book
(learn more)
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs):
(learn more)
somewhat competitive races, more negative campaign, comeback races, attack propensities, campaign negativity, dead heat race, runaway races, solo attacks, positive campaigning, attack topics, net approval, fear arousal, personal slurs, poll standings, dirty campaign, campaign discourse, campaign statements, negative campaigning Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
White House, United States, George Bush, Labor Day, New York Times, Democrats Fear, Republicans Fear, The Gallup Poll, New Jersey, Public Opinion, South Vietnam, Salt Lake City, Saddam Hussein, Scholarly Resources, Lyndon Johnson, Swift Boat Vets, Rose Garden, Dan Quayle, Social Security, Oval Office, Democratic Party, John Kerry, New Hampshire, National Guard, Willie Horton Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Front Flap | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Flap | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
somewhat competitive races, more negative campaign, comeback races, attack propensities, campaign negativity, dead heat race, runaway races, solo attacks, positive campaigning, attack topics, net approval, fear arousal, personal slurs, poll standings, dirty campaign, campaign discourse, campaign statements, negative campaigning Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
White House, United States, George Bush, Labor Day, New York Times, Democrats Fear, Republicans Fear, The Gallup Poll, New Jersey, Public Opinion, South Vietnam, Salt Lake City, Saddam Hussein, Scholarly Resources, Lyndon Johnson, Swift Boat Vets, Rose Garden, Dan Quayle, Social Security, Oval Office, Democratic Party, John Kerry, New Hampshire, National Guard, Willie Horton Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Front Flap | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Flap | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
