Qty:1
Attack of the Virgin Mumm... has been added to your Cart

Sell yours for a Gift Card
We'll buy it for up to $0.75
Learn More
Trade in now
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Color:
  • Attack of the Virgin Mummies: Un-cut version
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
  • Image not available
  • To view this video download Flash Player
      

Attack of the Virgin Mummies: Un-cut version


Price: $9.99 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
2 new from $9.99
Watch Instantly with Rent Buy
Other Formats & Versions Amazon Price New from Used from
DVD
"Please retry"
[DVD]
$9.99
$9.99
DVD-R Note: This product is manufactured on demand when ordered from Amazon.com. [Learn more]
$9.99 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details In Stock. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.


Frequently Bought Together

Attack of the Virgin Mummies: Un-cut version + Girls Gone Dead (Unrated and Exposed Edition)
Price for both: $20.48

Buy the selected items together

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Product Details

  • Actors: hannah harper
  • Directors: Daryl Carstensen
  • Producers: Ross Marshall
  • Format: NTSC
  • Language: English
  • Region: Region 1 (U.S. and Canada only. Read more about DVD formats.)
  • Rated: NR (Not Rated)
  • Studio: New World Pictures
  • DVD Release Date: October 20, 2008
  • Run Time: 71 minutes
  • Average Customer Review: 1.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
  • ASIN: B001IV610S
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #69,903 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
  • Learn more about "Attack of the Virgin Mummies: Un-cut version" on IMDb

Special Features

None.

Editorial Reviews

This product is manufactured on demand using DVD-R recordable media. Amazon.com's standard return policy will apply.

Customer Reviews

1.6 out of 5 stars
5 star
0%
4 star
0%
3 star
13%
2 star
38%
1 star
50%
See all 8 customer reviews
It doesn't even work as a skin flick.
Graves
Try instead The Mummy's Kiss, Mummy's Kiss 2nd Dynasty, and Blood Scarab.
John Williams
I'm not sure I even have words to describe how bad it is.
Robert Beveridge

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 10 people found the following review helpful By John Williams on March 13, 2011
Format: DVD Verified Purchase
I am a big fan of B movies, but this one lacks everything except a few naked girls. Many of the genre are much better; more girls and better production values.

Try instead The Mummy's Kiss, Mummy's Kiss 2nd Dynasty, and Blood Scarab.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Graves VINE VOICE on August 31, 2012
Format: DVD
I can enjoy good horror, schlock horror and even horror so bad it's good horror if only for the film merit but "Attack of the virgin mummies" has none of these. It is nothing but a skin flick and a bad skin flick at that.

The idea is that millennia ago...oh heck it doesn't matter. These horror/skin flicks can be good if they try but this doesn't even try. It's a bad excuse to have the most Nordic looking "Egyptians" EVER standing around naked with virtually no sets-posing as they call out to one another just so you can change shots to the next girl calling back. Shot on video tape instead of film it has a tacky, 1980's feel in all the wrong ways for its look. It doesn't even work as a skin flick.

I hoped it would get better but it didn't and I will confess I couldn't even make it to the conclusion. I saw no point and will never, EVER in my life wonder what happened at the end. The cast and directors clearly didn't care why should I?
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful By Robert Beveridge HALL OF FAMEVINE VOICE on August 8, 2011
Format: DVD
<strong>Attack of the Virgin Mummies</strong> (Daryl Carstensen and Andrew Schrom, 2004)

I had somehow gotten it into my head that <em>Attack of the Virgin Mummies</em> was a Misty Mundae movie, and I will sit through the worst schlock imaginable for a glimpse of the glorious Ms. Mundae. In this case, however, I was cruelly duped (and I will never speak to that associate again). It is a Misty-LIKE film, to be sure, in that it features a great deal of gratuitous nudity and a plot that stretches the bounds of the term ludicrous, but think on this: it took two directors to make a movie this utterly incompetent.

Writer-director Carstensen, a former animation checker who worked on movies as diverse as <em>The Iron Giant</em> and Bakshi's <em>The Lord of the Rings</em>, and his partner in crime Schrom (no other credits, and that's a GOOD thing) give us the story of three Egyptian princesses (<em>Crustacean</em>'s Hanna Harper and hardcore vixens Violet Blue and Nikki Love). First off, we get an extended scene that sets the stage. Three brothers come upon the girls bathing in the Nile (which looks a lot like the Snake River in northern Arizona...). Two of them (<em>Ben and Arthur</em>'s Michael Haboush and <em>Circle of Eight</em>'s David Reiner), natural-born charmers, are chatting up two of the lovelies, but their brother Turan (Peter Gullerud, whom Carstensen must have known from his animation days; Gullerud worked on animation and visual effects for Disney in the eighties and early nineties), who isn't too well-socialized, slips off with the third and ties her to a tree, and is about to have his way with her when they others find them.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: DVD
What an embarrassing piece of crap. This is one of the instances when "it's so bad it's good" does not apply. It's so bad it's bad. Period. When I first moved to the mountains, I went out as a lark for this low budget film and thought it would be fun. Fun turned out to be a google nightmare. You know a film is terrible when the only actor complimented in reviews (character Bob) is from the actor himself. When we did audio overdubs in the studio, Daryl, the main director, would choose the worst of our attempts at fixing things (which were shots on windy days with apparently inadequate wind/"pop" filters for the mics.) It's laughable how some of the reviews here get the actors mixed up, but no, I wasn't the one who "tied her to a tree and had my way with her" - that was good 'ol Ross (who by the way is a much more interesting actor than "FrazierDave".) I admit to being equally bad as an actor, though. Dave and I should never attempt this again. At least with such a bad director. If anyone deserves some attention, it's Ross Marshall. His comedic sense shows some modicum of potential, in my humble opinion. Enough said, but for the record (and for my equally embarrassed relatives) I never exposed my dick. And additionally, for the record, this, Professor R. Roehl (brother in law to my former girlfriend), was a "T and A" film. Not a porno. Good catering, though!!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in