Customer Reviews

The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, 1848-1938

5 star:		(5)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

Anyone with a serious interest in the late Habsburg Empire, Austria-Hungary, or Viennese culture should probably read this erudite, encyclopedic study. Johnston deserves praise for taking on a challenging subject. His extensive research and learning are obvious in the bibliography, notes, and the many names rescued from oblivion (many probably discussed here in English for the first time). Parts of this book are outstanding. That being said, I do not share the enthusiasm of other reviewers. In his search for overarching cultural forms or attitudes (such as "therapeutic nihilism"), Johnston makes too many sweeping generalizations, reducing individuals and their actions to sociological categories or cultural stereotypes. The people he describes often seem like caricatures. Not everyone in Vienna was neurotic, death-obsessed, or a dandy on the Ringstrasse. At one point he makes the far-fetched claim that the Hungarian language, by its very structure, causes Hungarians to become dreamers, disinclined to scrutinize reality. Johnston pigeonholes individuals by their ethnicity, religion, or nationality. He emphasizes conflicts among the different peoples and groups in the empire, but says little about the cultural cross-fertilization that also took place. He does recognize that the multilingual environment inspired reflection on the problems of language.

This is essentially a history of intellectual movements (who taught or influenced whom), not a social or cultural history, as the title might suggest. It does not say much about the politics of the era or the broader society (the section about Hungary is an exception). Johnston is at his best and most informative in discussing economists, legal theorists, and philosophers. The sections about philosophy and social theories are perhaps the most interesting, showing a range of thinkers, some of whom were very prescient concerning the future of Austria and Europe, and whose theories ranged from the utopian to the pessimistic to the sinister.

Johnston falters with literature and the arts. He treats Johann Strauss Jr. and his music in a rather dismissive way, seeming to overlook the fact that Strauss was a very good composer whose works quickly became popular all over the Western world and are still enjoyed more than a hundred years later. (For a better discussion of operetta as a cultural form, see Peter Hanak's book on Budapest and Vienna, "The Garden and the Workshop"). An artist as important as Oskar Kokoschka is quickly passed over in a few short paragraphs, conveying no sense at all of how Kokoschka's work developed and changed during his long productive lifetime. Other artists and works (Kolo Moser and the Wiener Werkstatte design studio, the operatic collaborations of Hofmannsthal and Richard Strauss, Ernst Krenek) are not mentioned at all. This is too bad, because the art and music of this period are perhaps its most lasting legacy. By contrast, the stature of psychoanalysis has declined since the 1960s, when this book was written, and the presentation of Freud in particular seems dated.

Some details: Johnston does not translate any of the many German titles he cites, a disadvantage for those who don't read German. He often refers to the "Herrenhaus," the Upper House of Parliament, without explaining the term. He mentions Marcionism many times, but defines it only after more than two hundred pages. Ditto for Herbartianism. Readers should have some background knowledge before starting, and be prepared to question some of the author's analysis and conclusions.

This book is packed with detailed information, and we learn a great deal from it, but somehow the full color and complexity of life have gone missing. Its strength is in the details, not the synthesis. We do not come closer to understanding the forces behind the unique cultural flowering of Central Europe, and of fin-de-siecle Vienna in particular. The prodigious creativity of that place and time remain as mysterious as before.

Johnston's book may not have everything that you ever wanted to know about the intellectual and cultural life of Austria-Hungary under the Hapsburgs, but if ever a single volume came close to having everything, then this is it. It has discussions of not only the "usual suspects" like Mach, Freud, Wittgenstein, but it also provides coverage of important figures in economics (i.e. Carl Menger, Schumpeter, Hayek), jurisprudence (i.e. Hans Kelsen, Karl Renner, Anton Menger), men of letters (i.e. Musil), philosophers (i.e. Schlick, Neurath, Lukacs, Buber, Ebner), music (i.e. Mahler, Schonberg), and many, many other important people. Johnston's book also covers other less well known but important figures too. For example, he covers Hans Gross, a pioneer in the development of scientific police detection.

Anyone who has already read such books as Allan Janik and Stephen Toulmins' *Wittgenstein's Vienna*, Malachi Hacohen's *Karl Popper: The Formative Years 1902-1945* or even, Edmonds & Eidinows'*Wittgenstein's Poker*, will appreciate this fascinating and well written book.

This book is worth every cent, an amazingly well written and concise history of the culture, from all angles. I can't recommend it highly enough.

For anyone interested in the artistic, philosophical and psychological impact of Viennese culture, this is a must. Freud, Wittgenstein, Schiele, etc. Prof. of History at U. Mass., Amherst, Johnston writes clearly and with enthusiasm. See also his illustrated _Vienna, Vienna_.

This is a wonderful book for all intellectual historians, and cultural historians interested in fin-de-siecle Austro-Hungary. It's a tour de force if ever there were one! But it manages to remain accecible at the same time.

Also, while many have written about Freud, Wittgenstein, Schiele etc., Johnston talkes about the lesser known figures of the era. That is this book's niche.

Johnston makes a concerted effort to leave absolutely no stone unturned. He begins with a brief adumbration of the history of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, emphasizing its frivolity, decadence, and rampant materialism, especially among the nobility. The kind of bureaucracy that we associate with the writings of Karl Kraus and Kafka were only too real for Austrians, a mixture of both uniformity and indolence, or as Johnston says, "absolutism mitigated by Schlamperei." He includes sections on both university life and military culture, apart from which Austrian social life would have been unrecognizable. Both religion and anticlericalism were fundamental, too.

The amount of information and number of names in this book can be exhausting, and this coming from someone who reads books on graduate-level syllabi for fun. It was so tiring, that after reaching the 300 page mark, I had to set it down for a week to find the energy to finish it. None of this is to say that I did not enjoy the book; I did, and I learned a great deal from it. But it does suffer from a surfeit of ambition. Because of the sheer number of names and ideas mentioned, it might in fact serve many people better as a reference work, rather than a book that you sit down and read from cover to cover.

There are a number of minor cavils I have with the book. 1) Hungarian intellectuals get about fifty pages at the very end, and the only major figures discussed are Georg Lukacs and Karl Mannheim. 2) Johnston continually refers to people by the geographic region from which they come and their religion, often starting sentences with, for example, "this Silesian Jew" or "that Viennese Lutheran," even when these identities have no relevance to his discussion of their ideas. 3) He refers to several figures as "Marcionists," but only explains how they are Marcionists once he is more than halfway through the book. 4) While his designation of many of these seminal figures as "therapeutic nihilists" is at times convincing, Johnston uses the phrase to pigeonhole some ideas into narrow categories at the cost of investigating their true complexity. 5) Lastly, as I have hinted at before, the book reads as more of a compendium of ideas and names than a book which presents a thesis, argues against or for it with evidence, and presents a conclusion. 6) Lastly, there is no mistake about the focus here: it is almost wholly intellectual history. The words "and social" could easily have been dropped from the title of the book, and would have given a fairer impression of what was presented between its covers.

None of this should discourage anyone with a real sense of gusto for this type of history. The real meat of the book is in its utterly exhaustive attempt to mention and account for every aspect of Viennese intellectual history. These are just a few of the areas that he covers: economic theory, psychology, legal theory, social theory, the history of "Austro-Marxism," music and music criticism, the visual arts, the writing of history and historiography, art and art history, philosophy (and not just generally - the philosophy of science, mathematics, logic, and the Vienna Circle), religion and theology, the social trends in Bohemian Reform Catholicism, and the birth of what can properly be called "geopolitics."

The book's coverage of most familiar figures - Freud, Kafka, and Strauss, to name a few - is perfectly adequate. However, it should really be most prized from rescuing dozens of names from the brink of obscurity. Of the more than seventy figures covered, I would imagine that more than half are probably not familiar to most of the English-speaking world.

It has proven especially edifying for me in respect to some of the literature I have read on fascism. While certainly not a major theme, one can definitely perceive varying types of extremism forming before your very eyes as you read about some of the social and political theory of the time, especially in the sections on Othmar Spann and the increasingly popular anti-Semitism of the time. If you read German fluently, the book's notes and bibliography combined run to almost one hundred pages, which should provide a good place to start, even considering the book's age (it was originally published in 1972). I would recommend this book to anyone who was interested in the time period, but reading it through might not be for everyone.

'The Austrian Mind' is the first book in English or in German to analyze both in depth and in breadth the intellectual history of the Hapsburg Monarchy between 1848 and 1938. Based upon an impressive command of primary and secondary published sources, Johnston's book is a tour de force.

In 400 pages of text the author evaluates the contributions of Austro-Hungarian intellectuals to economic, legal, and social theory, to the arts, to philosophy, to literature and criticism, and to medicine.