$6.99 + Free Shipping

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Avery Dennison 9170 Personal Label Printer Labels 1 X 2 5/8IN White

by Avery
5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

List Price: $12.99
Price: $6.99 & FREE Shipping
You Save: $6.00 (46%)
Only 10 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by UTTANA PRODUCTS.
  • Enter your model number above to make sure this fits.
  • High quality thermal labels compatible with the Avery Personal Label Printer.
  • Replacement labels for Avery Personal Label Printer AVE09100.
  • Addressing, Shipping/Name Badge and Return Address (two sizes).
  • AVE09170 1"x2-5/8", AVE09173 2-1/8"x3-1/2", AVE09176 11/16"x3", AVE09177 1/2"x1-3/4".
  • Sold by the BX

Discover More Office Products from Avery Discover More Office Products from Avery

$6.99 & FREE Shipping Only 10 left in stock. Ships from and sold by UTTANA PRODUCTS.

Product Description

Personal Label Printer Labels

Product Information

Technical Details

Brand Name Avery
Item Weight 1 ounces
Product Dimensions 2.7 x 3.4 x 3.2 inches
Item model number 9170
Color White
Number of Items 1
Size 1 x 2 5/8
Manufacturer Part Number 9170

Additional Information

ASIN B0006HV312
Customer Reviews
5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

5 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #52,207 in Office Products (See top 100)
#221 in Office Products > Office Supplies > Labels, Indexes & Stamps > Labels & Stickers > Address Labels
Shipping Weight 4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Domestic Shipping This item is also available for shipping to select countries outside the U.S.
International Shipping This item is not eligible for international shipping. Learn More
Date First Available July 7, 2004

Customer Reviews

5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
this Roll of Labels was perfect and ahead of schedule ,every bit of this transaction was conducted super-smoothly.
Thanks so much, LN
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse