Have one to sell? Sell yours here
BUTTER AND GUNS: America's Cold War Economic Diplomacy
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

BUTTER AND GUNS: America's Cold War Economic Diplomacy [Hardcover]

Diane B. Kunz (Author)
1.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  

Book Description

January 9, 1997
Until now, the history of the Cold War has been written as a series of diplomatic and military events: the Berlin airlift, the Korean War, the Cuban missile crisis, Vietnam, and countless covert and rhetorical maneuvers. When communism finally collapsed in 1989, it was suddenly obvious that economics had played a major role in the war. But what role exactly? Did the West succeed simply by the hidden hand of its markets? Or did Western powers offer direct and successful economic leadership?

The answer is that our economic policy was key to the war, even more central and important than military might. Since World War II, in a world of democratic powers and peripheral combat, economic diplomacy has become the chief engine of global politics and prosperity. In a book that will take its place alongside the great diplomatic histories of the period, Diane Kunz offers a definitive history of 50 years of American economic diplomacy.

From the Marshall Plan, to Bretton Woods, the Suez Crisis, the Alliance for Progress, the oil shocks, and beyond, America's international economic leadership has been controversial, at times misguided, difficult to sustain, yet ultimately triumphant. Though traditional wisdom insists that leaders must choose guns or butter that arms and prosperity are at odds Kunz argues the controversial thesis that America's economic and security policies worked hand-in-glove. With the great cause of containing communism as a driving force, presidents from Truman to Reagan built a nation both prosperous and strong while helping America's allies to achieve similar strengths. Diane Kunz's masterful narrative recounts the missing story at the heart of the American century.


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Kunz, an assistant professor of history at Yale, demonstrates that the long-term perceived threat posed by the Soviet Union legitimated government intervention in the U.S. domestic economy. Furthermore, she contends, that intervention provided both a good life for most Americans and the basis of national security, as the defense industry promoted long-term economic growth that nurtured decades of material prosperity and social stability. Economic diplomacy was the core of a foreign policy that linked participants in the Western economic order while binding them to a U.S. that was able and willing to assume the primary responsibilities of leadership because, for the first time in the country's experience, events abroad directly affected these shores. American economic dominance of the Western sphere, Kunz explains, depended on a non-zero-sum approach facilitating development without creating an overt client system. On the other hand, command economies on the Leninist model proved spectacularly unable to provide both butter and guns-a failure that sentenced them to oblivion. Meanwhile, far from creating "imperial overstretch" along the lines described by Paul Kennedy, the national security state created by the Cold War, Kunz says, provided prosperity at home and peace abroad. She argues provocatively that the subsequent decoupling of foreign and domestic policy is combining with free-market triumphalism to weaken the synergies that generated affluence and security. One need not accept her argument to appreciate this as a clear and well-researched analysis of a revolutionary period in U.S. history.
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal

Kunz (history, Yale Univ.) examines the Cold War from a different perspective, focusing on economic diplomacy rather than examining in traditional fashion the political and diplomatic events. Briefly, she recounts political and diplomatic issues in terms of how they affected the economic situation. Kunz concentrates on the evolution of our economic policy from the inception of Bretton Woods to its collapse in the late 1970s. One problem is her shallow discussion of diplomacy, particularly during the 1980s, which she barely mentions. Moreover, her explanations of the charts and graphs are weak, leaving readers unsure of their meaning. Despite these problems, her book adds immeasurably to our knowledge of the Cold War era, especially from an economic perspective. Recommended for scholars and specialists in the field.?Richard P. Hedlund, Ashland Community Coll., Ky.
Copyright 1997 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 432 pages
  • Publisher: Free Press (January 9, 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0684827956
  • ISBN-13: 978-0684827957
  • Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.5 x 1.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 1.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #512,791 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

1 Review
5 star:    (0)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
1.0 out of 5 stars (1 customer review)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Obviously has no idea what economics is all about., May 21, 2003
This review is from: BUTTER AND GUNS: America's Cold War Economic Diplomacy (Hardcover)
This is, frankly, a poor book. It is a mediocre history of US economic diplomacy since WWII, but it is episodic in nature and fails to really tie together the ebb and flow of international diplomacy over economic issues. It also entirely fails to discuss the economic theory that governs politics in this area such as rent-seeking, two-level games, and even the Ricardo-Viner or Stophler(sp?)-Samuelson models of international trade. Moreover, in stressing the importance of the US military-industrial complex as a source of economic growth and job creation during this period, she totally ignores concepts basic to economics and economic analysis -- opportunity and transaction costs -- and so wrongly argued that the vast amount of capital spent on the military was GOOD for the US economy. She also, to add to the poor analysis everywhere evident in this book, fails to show any real correlation between military spending and economic growth.

BAD BOOK!

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Discussion Replies Latest Post
The left is always trying to accuse the right of racism, but how many of them voted for Obama based on nothing but the color of his skin? 86 20 seconds ago
If Romney wins, will die hard Tea Party Republicans vote for him? And can centrist Americans trust anything he says? 24 23 seconds ago
The Southern Strategy - Why the GOP focuses on Southern States 155 55 seconds ago
Is it fair to call Obama the food stamp president? 12 1 minute ago
Romney gets the nom, Obama wins the Presidency.... 43 2 minutes ago
Is it anti-semitic to call for a new 9/11 investigation? 1668 3 minutes ago
Why is there so much anti-Semitism on the American Left today? 9073 4 minutes ago
Why Do So Many People Automatically and Angrily Condemn Historical Revisionism? 2452 11 minutes ago
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject