| |||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
For instance, Perahia is criticised for using pedal, and rubato. Anyone who has played this work (and other work by Bach) on the piano will know that it is technically not possible to make music out of every voice without judicious use of the pedal.
Besides, notes which linger on in Bach add complexity, and understanding. Often, holding a note a little longer demonstrates a horizontal (melodic) or vertical (harmonic) connection otherwise only hinted at.
Perahia is a model of restraint in his use of pedal, despite the criticism.
As for the criticism of the use of rubato, I suggest that for a start, the reviewer should define what they mean. Are they talking about within the beat, the bar, a phrase?
Whatever they mean, only someone who has not played Bach would imagine that it can be played musically with a slavish adherence to the metronome.
Rubato is only a problem when it obscures the sense of the music. In some epochs, more is permitted. In Horowitz's day, much more freedom was allowed. Horowitz is always convincing. As is Perahia, who is a model of restraint (to adopt the rubato-disapprover's sense of right and wrong) compared to Horowitz.
Perahia's uses phrase-based rubato and he conceives the music in large phrases. His rubato simply emphasises the architecture of the music, as he feels it.
Others call the performance "idiosyncratic". Ironically, some of these people prefer Gould, who is both idiosyncratic, self-indulgent, and sometimes plain idiotic.
Others criticise what they perceive to be his emphasis on the bass-line. Perahia simply gives each voice equal weight, which is exactly what the music calls for. That is the beauty of Bach, every voice is equally important. Other players (such as Schiff, for instance, when he plays Bach fugues) tend to emphasis what they perceive to be the melodic voice.
Yet another customer says that they "prefer Perahia's poetic period", which they imagine was years ago. Have they listened to his recent recording "Songs without Words", in particular, "Nun komm, der Heiden Heiland"? There has been no loss of "poetry" in Perahia's playing, though he has never had the weight, depth, and sadness of a player like Nikolaeva, which may come from the sorrow of decades of Russian winters.
Perahia articulates each voice faultlessly. He does not call attention to himself, and he uses a pianist's tools (ie, rubato, pedal, touch) to sculpt his interpretation.
It is a fine performance.
However, the point is not the technical analysis, but the playing itself. There are many, many felicities in his playing: the fairly rare but generally playful embellishments, the rock-solid fingers, the lightness of the fleet variations, the gravity of the slower variations, including the palpable grief of the last great slow variation, the onward rush at the end.
This is a great recording from a great artist.