79 of 79 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
FATALLY FLAWED RESEARCH AND CONSLUSIONS, October 15, 2010
This review is from: In Bad Company: America's Terrorist Underground (Hardcover)
The author has offered himself as an expert in the field as a PhD, university criminology professor and author of numerous related materials.
Throughout the entire book there is not one footnote, not one attribution to connect definitive statements (statements offered as fact in most instances) or quotes to actual and credible sources. Instead, in the "Notes" section, the author states, "To facilitate the narrative, sources for each chapter have been gathered into one single note." Then follows a list of references grouped by chapter. This is hardly an authoritative or scholarly method to support a work product that makes such significant conclusions; allegedly based on factual research.
Most of the conspiracy conclusions are centered on the thinnest of speculation by claiming broad overlapping timelines based on some simplistic statistical probability that allegedly connect Timothy McVeigh to Peter Langan, Richard Lee Guthrie, and others, and the Aryan Republican Army (ARA) to the Oklahoma City bombing.
The problem with the conclusions is that none of the source material is properly identified and quoted, or, is erroneously used to prove a weak theory.
For instance, the author bases much of his conclusions on the ninety-one page FBI initial two-week debriefing (FD-302) of Guthrie and Guthrie's "manuscript" (a 315 page handwritten story, entitled The Taunting Bandits, he wrote in jail between his arrest in January and his suicide in July 1996). I for one know that material because I wrote the FD-302, spent hundreds of hours with Guthrie, read the "manuscript" carefully, along with all the other material of an extensive nearly four year FBI investigation into ARA and its bank robbery and white supremacist activities.
Without attribution, the author, to use a phrase, cherry-picks, out of context statements that support this broad conspiracy theory--but completely ignores--explicit and factual material that totally disproves his weak conclusions. The book is peppered with; could have's, would have's, may's and perhap's, without foundation. Knowing the record of this case, it's apparent that the author made up things as he went along. It would be impossible to legitimately source some of the author's allegedly factual claims.
The factual and substantive errors in the book would literally take another book to document and explain. Aside from the erroneous statements in pages 171-174, two other key definitive statements that support the author's theories, page 291 that "...details of the connection were explained in "The Taunting Bandits," and page 263 regarding a supposed meeting with McVeigh in Arkansas, are simply not true and cannot be proven by the author.
If In Bad Company was fiction, it would have been either ignored or dismissed, but that it purports to be a factual basis for alternative theories for April 19, 1995, it is dreadfully lacking in credibility and does a disservice to the victims and their families.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Weak case for OKC bombing connection, January 26, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: In Bad Company: America's Terrorist Underground (Hardcover)
When Hamm sticks to telling the story of Pete Langan and his Aryan Republican Army cohorts, he does a passable job. His sometimes huge jumps in logic to connect Tim McVeigh to the ARA muddy the book. Hamm does not make as strong a case as he thinks when trying to convince a reader that McVeigh was tied to these guys. Hamm's thesis is that McVeigh was a "slash-and-burn" terrorist who didn't have the skill, patience or brains to plan a big project on his own (in his previous "Apocalypse," he makes the case that McVeigh was also a drug addict). Yet the guy sat silently and patiently for six years in prison and went to his death without opening his mouth while Langan told Hamm his story and Richard Guthrie chose prison suicide over time in the slammer. For a not-too-bright "slash-and-burn" criminal, McVeigh did pretty well keeping his mouth shut and being patient. A lot of the connections Hamm makes seem not too well grounded in fact. For example, he discusses a letter he received from McVeigh's Death Row pal David Hammer in reply to one Hamm sent to McVeigh about a robbery mentioned in the book. McVeigh supposedly tells Hammer to write back with the names of guys from the ARA, thereby proving to Hamm that McVeigh is acquainted with these guys. The content of the letter and any follow-up with Hammer or McVeigh then die in their tracks. There's not a lot of good reporting here, just a lot of theories.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
A Very Silly Book, January 20, 2002
This review is from: In Bad Company: America's Terrorist Underground (Hardcover)
Author Hamm has written a silly book. If he would just call it fiction stop pretending that it is an academic work it would be more honest - but then it would not be as good as books by Joseph Wambaugh or John Grisham.
For the record the largest FBI probe in history (prior to Sept. 11) investigated the Oklahoma City bombing for years and found none of the conspiracies that Hamm writes about.
Hamm claims that his subjects ("targets" would be a more appropriate word) - right-wingers - are motivated by "conspiracy theories." But he himself concocts a ridiculous conspiracy theory in which a half dozen sexually perverted teenagers - who would stick out in San Francisco much less the Midwest - run around the country for months robbing banks and planting bombs - all the while eluding the FBI.
This book reads like a long press release from the Anti-Defamation League or the Southern Poverty Law Center trying to drum up contributions to stop "white supremacy" - e.g. the silly rantings of poor, working-class white kids who, far from being supreme, have neither power, education, or influence in American society.
....
Hamm's silly conspiracy-mongering is a sad indictment of Indiana State University which allows him to masquerade as a criminologist.
....
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No