15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
More barbarism than civilization?, March 8, 2009
This review is from: Barbarism and Civilization: A History of Europe in Our Time (Hardcover)
Even a keen reader needs some incentive to buy and plough through a book of nine hundred pages (including notes, bibliography and index). There are after all other works which survey the history of Europe in the twentieth century, notably Hobsbawm's "Age of Extremes - the Short Twentieth Century" (1994) or the final chapters of Norman Davies' "Europe - A History" (also 1994). Admittedly, Wasserstein takes the story up to 2007, but that hardly justifies the entire volume. His accounts of each event are thorough - he is good, for example, on the origins of the First World War - but on most such events more specialised works can be found: indeed many are listed in his voluminous bibliography (which however does not seem to include either of the works just mentioned). It would be helpful if he indicated which parts of his work he regards as original, but this is not apparent. One could of course treat his very comprehensive work as a useful book of reference - the index is comprehensive - but that was probably not his aim.
The title "Barbarism and Civilization" suggests an interesting and potentially important theme, which in a shorter work might have been brought out more clearly. As it is, this gets lost in the mass of information. The barbaric disasters of the century are well enough known, from the horrors of trench warfare in the First World War through the Nazi holocaust and the devastation of the Second World War to the Balkan conflicts of the 1990s. Where, if anywhere, were the "civilizing" influences? Wasserstein concludes on a grimly pessimistic note. After discussing the decline of religion and the lack of an "alternative social morality", he writes: "Evil stalked the earth in this era, moving men's minds, ruling their actions, and begetting the lies, greed, deceit, and cruelty that are the stuff of the history of Europe in our time".
Fortunately, most Europeans can think of more positive factors. It is curious that he passes over, as of little significance, the movement towards greater integration between European states and peoples. One searches in vain in the "Contents" for a chapter, or at least a section, on the creation and development of the European Union: it turns up in scattered fragments, generally as a pendant to the actions of the individual nations, and any comment he makes tends to be critical. Clearly he does not understand the decision-making process of the EU - the Commission does not, for example, "work with" the Council of Ministers (p.461) - and consequently he fails to bring out the complex process by which national interests have gradually been attuned to common European priorities; nor does he discuss the role of the European Court of Justice in ensuring the pre-eminence of European laws in the areas to which they apply.
Yet: was it insignificant that France and Germany, having fought each other three times in eighty years, decided first to merge their vital coal and steel sectors, then to create a common market with common institutions? Was it not important that their initiative was followed, step by step, by almost all the Western European nations, that membership came to underpin democracy in the former dictatorships in Southern Europe and later to offer a refuge for the Eastern European countries shaking off their Communist regimes? Has it not been a civilizing influence that citizens can move freely from Ireland to Greece, from Finland to Portugal? or that the Erasmus programme (nowhere mentioned by Wasserstein) has enabled thousands of young people to study in countries other than their own? That, ultimately, and despite all the faults and limitations of its institutions, Europe - at least up to the frontiers of the former Soviet Union - has become an oasis of relative peace in a troubled world?
One feels, sadly, that Wasserstein after all his efforts has missed what might have made his work a real contribution to understanding, particularly on the part of readers in the USA.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent 1 Volume History of 20th C. Europe, October 19, 2010
This was an excellent one volume history of Europe from 1914 to the early 21st century. If there were any weaknesses I would say this would be found in the author's treatment of the major dictators of the inter-war and war years ~ a little on the cliche side...no new observations which would help to flesh them out thereby offering a complexity that is generally missing.
But on the whole is the best one volume history of 20th century Europe that I have read to date. Highly recommended.
Some places are very readable and others drag a bit but taking the good with the bad this was an excellent read. It is long...almost 800 pages of text and over a hundred of endnotes, bibliography, index, etc...but if you have the time you should not be disappointed by the analysis.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No