14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great imagery, characters, plot - high moments of wonder, July 23, 1998
By A Customer
I always enjoy reading her books due to the imagery and variety of different character types and personalities she incorporates into her story lines. The Bat was my favorite...it had the "old" mystery feel. The characters were very well described and therefore, easy to imagine. I began feeling what the characters felt and encountered in that dark, old estate. It is hard for me to get through a book without getting bored and starting on another. However, The Bat traveled with me to work, the gym and house each day, just so I could finish it. I couldn't seem to put it down. Great piece of literature...one I would highly recommend for those who love a good mystery!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Generally speaking, don't read "The Bat" -- here's why..., May 21, 2009
"The Bat" was originally written by Mary Roberts Rinehart as a play in 1926 -- it ultimately emerged as a silent film, additional remakes, etceteras. It's a cool mystery story, albeit the text/dialogue is notably stilted (justifiably) due to its intended purpose for the stage.
However, "The Bat" is clearly a re-working of a far superior story (an actual novel, which was also later made into a film), brilliantly written by Rinehart in 1908 and entitled:
THE CIRCULAR STAIRCASE.
So here's the deal. I'm pretty sure that if you're a huge Rinehart fan and assuming you've already read "The Circular Staircase," (Rinehart's Magnum opus) then you're not going to care much for "The Bat," due chiefly to the writing style and additionally considering the fact that it comes off as a watered-down version of its genesis.
Here's the basic story of "The Bat": An elite, rich, and spunky older lady rents a country house for the summer along with her skittish Irish maid and her niece. Some servants sort of come with the property but most soon abandon their new matron due to happenings within this large mansion. A converging plot concerns the homeowner (a banker) who has recently died and whose bank has just coincidentally failed -- the suspicion falls upon a youthful bank clerk who is the heart-throb of the old lady's niece. The central plot revolves around a mysterious and effective murder/burglar dubbed by the frustrated police as The Bat, (a character who does not appear in the original novel form) and who has been operating in the vicinity of this country home. The subsequent happenings in the house are almost slapstick in nature, in the old lady's efforts in solving the mystery of both the infamous Bat's activities and the bank embezzlement.
Rinehart is nowadays generally lauded as the "If I had but known" school of mystery writing and she was infinitely successful in carrying out that novelistic endeavor. Her mysteries typically focus upon the happenings within some mysterious edifice, ergo:
The Yellow Room and
The Red Lamp. Both of these well-known mystery novels are terrific and the former may arguably be the greatest mystery of all time, (in fact, Agatha Christie's renowned fictional detective, Hercule Poirot, asserts this as fact in
The Clocks (Hercule Poirot).)
If you wish to read "The Bat" as a pure Rinehart fan, I heartily endorse your decision to do so. And if you prefer a more pulp-fiction era detective approach to mystery writing, conveying the ambiance of Ellery Queen and/or Raymond Chandler, then you may actually prefer "The Bat" over "The Circular Staircase." But if you favor a Christie/Sayers cozy murder, then go for the former alternative. One final difference between the two works is this: "The Circular Staircase" is conveyed in First Person, while "The Bat" is yielded up in Third Person.
In any case, just because the marketers have published this edition to "appear" to be a novel, don't be fooled -- this one is a re-tread, and was originally intended for production as a play. A minor point, I should also mention that the text contains some fairly mild racist language which was very typical of the fiction of this period.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No