| |||||||||||||||
Armed with information from numerous interviews, access to previously secret documents (many reproduced in the book), extensive research, and their own recollections, the authors roam the existing Cold War literature, correcting lies and false conclusions, putting rumors to rest, and exposing ignorance--in short, setting the record straight. They provide definitive accounts of many key episodes, including the double defection of Otto John, the head of West German counterespionage, and the famous tunnel incident of 1955-56, in which an American tunnel into the Soviet sector was exposed by a highly placed informant and then "discovered" in an elaborate ploy to protect the agent. Battleground Berlin is a remarkable amalgam. It is a fascinating, sometimes gripping spy story, complete with safe houses, forged identities, double agents, and street-corner rendezvous; it is also a scrupulously researched piece of historical scholarship and analysis.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
18 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Setting the Record Straight,
By A Customer
This review is from: Battleground Berlin: CIA vs. KGB in the Cold War (Hardcover)
This is a historic book, which anyone interested
in the history and practice of espionage will
appreciate. LeCarre it is not; while there is
some bit of cloak and dagger (Murphy relates the story of the KGB attempting to capture him in a Vienna) for the most part the book is a set of
essays addressing the questions
of what each side did and knew. The strength of
the book comes from the first hand of Murphy and
Kondrashev as station chiefs in Berlin of the
CIA and KGB respectively, and from the fact that
Murphy and Kondrashev had unprecedented access to
CIA and KGB files to document their conclusions.
These essays are loosely organized and the chronology is often repetitive: in the chronology of events, and in the apparent structure of Murphy and Kondrashev writing contrasting points of view sounds good in theory but repetitive in practice: the book does not have the clear argumentative flow that a book by a single author would have, and it lacks clear headings identifying section author. Last week, Murphy and Kondrashev were in New York at a panel discussion sponsored by the Harriman Institute and the Yale University Press, held at the Yale Club. The questions from the audience were appalling, but there were two points made on the panel that might be of interest here. The first concerns a claim made by the book that in looking into the effects of intelligence on the leaders consuming it, there was a pattern: the CIA had limited resources and limited penetration of the east; this meant that information was sketchy; however, analysis was thorough and objective and well-considered by the Western leaders. In contrast, the KGB had spectacular assets: high level penetration of French and British intelligence that produced immediate and insight into the Western positions. However, as the Soviet intelligence moved up the chain toward Stalin, fear and organizational dynamics led the analysts to spin the data to suit Stalin preconceptions and socialist ideology. The KGB intelligence, in other words, was ideologically pure but as a consequence it was misleading. This led Stalin, for example, to believe that the Western countries could be budged from Berlin by the blockade, even when Western leaders had agreed among themselves that they would not be budged. At the Press panel, this book assertion was challenged: the Historian on the panel claimed that there was evidence in the book that the CIA intelligence was just as ideologically driven. Little evidence was given to support this challenge, but as you read the book, you might keep your eyes open for it. The second point raised at the panel was to highlight one of the book's most novel claims: that 1) the KGB knew about the Berlin tunnel even before it had been built and 2) even so, they considered the source of their knowledge -- George Blake, a mole in british intelligence -- so precious an asset that they couldn't risk his discovery by putting disinformation onto the line. At the panel, Kondrashev asserted that he knew this to be so, because he was Blake's case officer, and he knew how limited was the distribution of the knowledge within the KGB. The book examines these assertions effectively; the details of this analysis (which went beyond the simple rehearsed denial by Kondrashev at the panel) include examination of disinformation that continued after the discovery of the tunnell, and a detailed inventory of the information that the west gained by tapping the soviet telephones through the tunnel. I'd enjoy chatting about the book more if you read it; feel free to email me.
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Authoritative and detailed,
This review is from: Battleground Berlin: CIA vs. KGB in the Cold War (Paperback)
This is the first time a thorough review of post war Berlin intelligence activities has been published. For the professional this is a good compilation of operations (collection, defection, analysis, etc.). For the novice the book is a difficult read - chock full of details but not written in captivating language. Students of history need to add this to their collection of books to keep and use as reference.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
More fascinating than Le Carre or Ludlum,
By A Customer
This review is from: Battleground Berlin: CIA vs. KGB in the Cold War (Hardcover)
Only the collapse of the Soviet Union could have opened a "window" in history which would allow two men, adversaries in the most arctic period of the Cold War, to tell the full story of what really went on in the epicenter of intelligence warfare, divided Berlin. Even more extraordinary is that David Murphy and Sergei Kondraschev were able, thirty years after they served leading roles in this clash of armies of the night, to break down residual barriers of this conflict and collaborate on this book. They supplement first-hand accounts with documents and interviews that complete an unparalleled picture of the real world on which novels like THE SPY WHO CAME IN FROM THE COLD andFUNERAL IN BERLIN were based. This brilliant account is not merely more compelling than any novel; it is more compelling than any novel CAN be
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|