1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Book For a Quick Overview of the Battles of Atlanta, August 20, 2010
This review is from: Battles for Atlanta (Civil War) (Hardcover)
This book gives many interesting details of the strategies of both sides which is fascinating. You come to admire the strength and courage of both armies regardless of your view of the war. This book shows that Atlanta was not given up without a fight. Johnston defensive strategy, and Sherman's flanking maneveurs all the way from Tennessee to Atlanta are detailed with maps, photos, and more. The sacking of Johnson for Hood before the battle of Atlanta is described along with the various opinions of generals and historians on the effect of this move. The author treats both Johnson and Hood fairly telling of their strengths, weaknesses and foul ups in battle. The book details many of the generals plans, and how they were not carried out correctly either resulting in disasters or unexpected miracles. This book gives you a real sense of what it took for Atlanta to be conquered and the valiant efforts of both sides in this struggle. Also the plight of African Americans and their role in the conflict detailed. At one point the confederates actually considered drafting African Americans into their army, and african americans helped both sides with fortifications and ditches. The Union african americans were paid for their help. The pictures of Atlanta showing old signs showing slaves for sale is shocking and reminds you that the right side won the war regardless of the atrocities commited by the North in Atlanta, or your pride in your ancestors who may have fought for the union or confederates. The book details the comradarie of the troops on both sides and how during the peaceful times that would trade tobacco for coffee and sing together. Then the next day they would be killing each other. Great book! The only small complaint I have is that the book ends without detailing Sherman's burning and destruction of Atlanta which even to this day is considered controversial. This was something that caused Atlantans a scar that they would nurse for over 100 years which did not help the Civil Rights movement in the 1960's. The book tries to steer the middle course and not be too offensive; but by leaving out Sherman's burning of Atlanta does a diservice to history. Still a great book though that I would highly reccomend and have thoroughly enjoyed. Learn about Vicksburg before reading this book, and it will make this book even more interesting.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No