Customer Reviews

Bears

5 star:		(3)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(3)

 

 

Trust Maurice Sendak to remain mischievous well into his old age. When somebody somewhere proposed that he reillustrate Ruth Krauss's classic and bizarre 1948 title, "Bears", he could have done so without so much as a whimper. Instead, right on the title page, one of the first things you see is a bear hanging by a noose. BANG! Parents who are going to be shocked are shocked and parents who are pretty well aware that kids don't detect any difference between nooses and plain old ropes are nonplussed. The wheat has been separated from the chaff from the very beginning and by the time you've gotten to page 3 you know that you are deep into Sendak's brain without any turning back. "Bears" wasn't without controversy when it first came out, of course. In his book, "Dear Genius"* author Leonard S. Marcus points out that, "Some critics found this picture book, with its nonnarrative, singsong text...bewilderingly offbeat and insubstantial". Now Sendak's given it a narrative and it stars one of his best-known creations. Bizarre, funny, and overwhelmingly bearable (ho ho), the book is sure to be beloved by some and abhorred by others.

It's Max! The hero from "Where the Wild Things Are", is back and he's going to bed. Only thing is, as he goes to retire with his faithful dog at his side he sees that somebody (the grinning pup seems a likely culprit) has hung Max's favorite teddy from the ceiling. Max rescues his toy and is just snuggling down to sleep with it (as a jealous man's-best-friend looks on) when the dog finds he cannot take it anymore and runs off with Max's stuffed bear. What ensues is a chase as Max pursues his dog, stumbling all the while past odd bear-related scenes and images. He runs past them "On the stairs", and "Under chairs". With each two-page spread, Max tries to get closer to his dog and stuffed bear, all the while avoiding the very real bears that trundle around them. By the end, Max has successfully snatched back his stuffed animal but who gets to snuggle up to him in the bed? One very happy puppy.

The book has received numerous accolades with this new production. The New York Public Library, for example, decided that it deserved to be added to The Anne Carroll Moore Collection (the closest thing that library system has to a best book of the year award). The book itself is an interesting look at later Sendak. He's grown far more comfortable with a cartoonish style in his old age. There are plenty of speech bubbles and exclamations popping up all throughout the text. I know that Sendak has always been a great fan of "Little Nemo" so maybe this is his unofficial tribute to the great man (aside from the more obvious tribute, "In the Night Kitchen"). The illustrations to "Bears" are also a little sloppy but are by no means poorly done. Some artists (like William Steig, for example) come into an entirely new style as they age. Here Sendak employs thick black lines and broad details. His bears are sometimes (often, actually) threatening, sometimes unhappy, sometimes joyous, and always interesting to watch.

Of course, you can't go about reviewing a re-illustrated book if you haven't gone about finding the original title (with original pictures) as well. Originally illustrated by Phyllis Rowand, the 1948 production of "Bears" is an exercise in child-friendly surrealism. For example, the page that talks about "Millionaires" shows a group of bears, all different sizes, in top hats, smoking cigars, and swimming in luxurious pools (top hats still firmly in place). "Everywheres", by contrast, is a raucous weirdo conglomeration of images. Perhaps my favorite non sequitor is the mailbox which, for no particular reason, is addressed to the "Wallace Boatyard / Sound Boats, East Norwalk, Conn". Sendak's images, in contrast, are a bit less lighthearted. The two-page spread of "Giving Stares" is of threatening and frightened bears glaring at one another as Max relentlessly pursues his pup. "Collecting Fares", interestingly, is rather similar to Rowand's image. If Sendak were a young man I'm not so certain that a train would be the first thing that comes to mind with those words(let alone a train with the porters in uniform). Both illustrators also thought that "Stepping in squares" referred to sidewalk squares. Where Sendak exceeds Rowand without question is the spread of "Millionaires". Oh he goes all out on this one! There is a bear in a top hat smoking a cigar, yes. But there are also bears in furs, one who bears some resemblance to Josef von Sternberg, one in a turban, and multiple small bears with crowns and fawning features. Each bear-related portion of the book is full of zest and life and a kind of crackling energy. Not bad for a fellow who started in this genre in the 50s.

In "Dear Genius", the great children's book editor Ursula Nordstrom had this to say about the discovery of "Bears". "I remember one day Ruth Krauss brought in 5 manuscripts and had me read them while she sat by my desk and stared at me. I didn't like 4 of them but the 5th was the text of Bears (on half a piece of typewriter paper) and I went into hysterics and took it on the spot `I think you are insane,' Ruth said coldly. And a good thing too". Yup. A very good thing. I seriously doubt an author could walk into a publisher's house today with the same words and come up with a book that has half the originality and plumb gall of "Bears". And I doubt any illustrator would apply the same kind of manic glee that Sendak has shown here. It's a testament to the power of the picture books and capacity children have towards being amazed. It's not for everyone, but for those who get it, it's an exercise in absurd enjoyment.

* Marcus, Leonard S. (1993). Dear Genius: The Letters of Ursula Nordstrom. New York: Harper Collins pgs. 64 & 280.

This is a great book that my two-year old loves. Simple rhymes, lots of bears to look at and fun to read aloud. Definitely recommended.

Wow, it's not very often that you see a little teddy bear hanging from a noose in a children's book. As a mom of a girl and boy (5 and 3) I was aghast. I mean, what the heck is up with that?!?

Still Ruth Krauss and Sendak... I thought I'd take a further look. But my goodness. Like a bad movie that they try to make 'better' with a host of over-the-top stars, this just stinks.

My children did not find the artwork cute, nor the text understandable. I read it twice myself before I realized that there just wasn't anything there.

One Star. Can't recommend it to anyone. Entire text follows so you can see for yourself.

Bears, bears, bears, bears, bears
On the Stairs
Under chairs
Washing hairs
Giving stares
Collecting fares
Stepping in squares
Millionaires
Bears, bears, bears, bears, bears
everywheres

Max from Where the Wild things are is back! His imagination is a wild as ever! This time he is having grand adventures with BEARS!!! The bears are everywhere! Under chairs, on stairs, collecting bus fairs and so much more!


What did you like or not like about the book?


The book only had 27 words. Perfect book for toddlers to listen to!


Would you recommend the book? Why or Why not?

Yes we would. On each page the bears are doing a different activity. Always something neat to look at while the book is being read aloud.

I have been looking for this book to get for my boys!

This was one of my favorite books when I was little! I loved the rhyming of it! So glad I found it so I can share it with my boys!

...this book is pretty vacuous. I'm referring to the 2005 remake, with new artwork by Maurice Sendak (who I find very hit-or-miss...) Krauss and Sendak collaborated several times in the 1950s and '60s, but this tepid outing doesn't recapture the buoyancy of those old days, as hard as Sendak may have tried. Feels like he was just coasting here, and though many parents and longtime devotees got into this one, I thought it was just plain boring. Haven't read the 1948 original. (Axton)

***NOTE*** Other reviews listed here assume this is the Sendak-illustrated book. It is not. Notice that Amazon has listed ROWLAND as the illustrator! Two very different editions, folks. Two very different sensibilities.

My original review follows.

It's amazing how fabulous illustrations can make a difference! Sendak's illustrations in a later edition amplify and expand the text in Ruth Krauss' book. This original version, illustrated by Phyllis Rowand, is cute, but falls flat for me.

Two problems with this book:
1. On one of the inset pages there is a bear hanging from a noose.
2. In the story, as the dog is hiding from Max, he thinks to himself, "Dumb."

We felt these were inappropriate images/words for our child. We returned the book.