|Amazon Price||New from||Used from|
I often get asked the question why I use animals in my stories. Life of Pi was set in a zoo and featured a number of animals, and animals once again play a prominent role in my new novel, Beatrice and Virgil. Am I a great animal lover? Well, I suppose I am; nature is indeed beautiful. But the actual reason I like to use animals is because they help me tell my tale. People are cynical about people, but less so about wild animals. A rhinoceros dentist elicits less skepticism, in some ways, than a German dentist. I also use animals in my fiction because people rarely see animals as they truly are, biologically. Rather, they tend to project human traits onto them, seeing nobility in one species, cowardice in another, and so on. This is biological nonsense, of course; every species is and behaves as it needs to in order to survive. But this animal-as-canvas quality is useful for a storyteller. It means that an animal that people feel kindly towards becomes a character that readers feel kindly towards.
Why did I choose to write a novel about the Holocaust? There’s nothing personal to this interest; I’m neither Jewish, nor of German or eastern European extraction. I’m a complete outsider who’s been staring at this monstrous massacre of innocents since I first learned about it as a child living in France. It’s as an artist that I’ve kept coming back to the subject. What can I do as an artist about the Holocaust? I believe that if history does not express itself as art, it will not survive in common human memory. And so I took what I knew of the Holocaust, the cumulative knowledge of my reading and viewing and visiting (both to camps in Poland and Germany and to Yad Vashem in Israel and to various museums), and I set it next to that part of me that wants to understand through the imagination. Then I sat down and wrote Beatrice and Virgil.
Almost felt like I was just waiting for the book to end so that I can say, "I knew it!"
Reading this book was a very unique experience, and I give Mr. Martel props for his interesting style and format of the novel, if for no other reason.
Henry is never fully developed as a character and as a result, we never become very involved in his story.
I am still in shock at what I have read. For the first two-thirds of this book I thought, "Finish the book, your daughter asked you to read it, and you agreed". Read morePublished 17 days ago by JamRam
With the potential to be horribly offensive. And the potential to be ground-breaking. Read more
Yann Martel is a pure genius. This book will hurt you, and the fact that literature can still do that proves that traditional art is not dead.Published 1 month ago by d'Ivoire commissaire
After reading Life of Pi and finding it a great story, I had high hopes for this novel, but it looks like Yann Martel is a one man novel.Published 1 month ago by Felipe Behrens
Loved Life with Pi and was so disappointed that this book didn't draw me in nearly as much.Published 2 months ago by LMD
Beautifully written. Very disturbing - a different way to get a sense of the horror of the holocaust. So - not a fun read, but a deep read.Published 2 months ago by Nancy
Four elements form this novel, listed in order of appearance: 1) A narrative following a thinly disguised Yann Martel; 2) fragments of a story entitled “St. Read morePublished 3 months ago by W. J. TAYLOR