1 new from $27.99

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

2013 Beautiful Visions of Nature 12 Month Wall Calendar 12 x 12

2.8 out of 5 stars 14 customer reviews

Available from these sellers.
1 new from $27.99

Teachers, create and share supply lists Teachers, create and share supply lists


Product Information

Technical Details

Brand Name Greenbrier
Item Weight 4.8 ounces
Product Dimensions 15 x 11.8 x 0.2 inches

Additional Information

ASIN B008QI3Z28
Customer Reviews
2.8 out of 5 stars 14 customer reviews

2.8 out of 5 stars
Best Sellers Rank #229,209 in Office Products (See top 100)
#6,620 in Office Products > Office Supplies > Calendars, Planners & Personal Organizers > Wall Calendars
Shipping Weight 4.8 ounces
Date First Available July 29, 2012

Warranty & Support

Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Feedback

Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
The calendar is printed on thin magazine-quality paper - similar quality calendars with advertisements are distributed free in my town. It was packaged in tight plastic wrap , and the thin paper became wavy as a result. I will be buying a replacement; it looks cheap, and the paper will likely tear when the calendar is hung.
Comment 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
I received this calendar as a gift and was disappointed. The paper it is printed on is very thin and every page is wavy.
Comment 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
I was looking for a reasonable quality wall calendar for our kitchen. You know, something that
my wife can write down all those important doctor appointments, kid activities, etc.
This was done on thin (20 lb?), non-opaque paper so pictures and writing show through.
The pictures look nice, but again, ultra thin paper compromises the quality.
We hung the calendar on a nail, and within a day the hole for the month of January ripped.
Avoid this product, spend a little more and get a calendar where the pictures are printed
on heavier glossy paper. We're throwing it away.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
I bought mine at a dollar store. For $1, it's fine. The pictures are beautiful and the size is large. However, the paper is super thin and flimsy. I keep the corners from folding in by putting paperclips on each corner. I would never pay more than a $1 though.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
I have this calendar, purchased it at the 99 cent store, while the pictures are beautiful, the quality of the paper is poor. Also none of the the pictures have a caption that tells you the location of the nature scene. I love the waterfalls, but where in the world would I find them?
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
The pictures themselves were beautiful. Quality of the pictures awful. Paper was so thin that it was wrinkled throughout, looked like it had been soaked in water. Spoiled beautiful pictures. $12 shot.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
The item was a little bent and and had the appearance of looking cheap. It was not worth the price.
Comment One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse