Customer Reviews

Beethoven: Piano Concertos Nos. 1-5 / Choral Fantasy

5 star:		(4)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

Daniel Barenboim's late 1960s recording of the Beethoven Piano Concertos is one of the best, and an interesting contrast: the young, brilliant pianist Barenboim with the elderly condcutor Klemperer. Klemperer was known for slow tempos by the 1960s, and a sense of granitic structure: like viewing a beautiful rock hewn of granite from a distance, but not something you can get close to, nor call "charming" or "loving." This sense is present in Klemperer's orchestral contribution to these recordings: tempos are never too fast, and there is a sense that something timeless and great is going to happen in every movement. Barenboim's pianism seems awesome: flawless and technically perfect, and the Philharmonia Orchestra plays beautifully in each concerto. Recorded sound is very good: analog stereo from the late 1960s.

Keep in mind, however, these are not "cold" recordings. The music may be calculated under Klemperer's direction to a certain degree, but everything makes perfect musical sense, and Beethoven's titanic greatness shines throughout. If you like a more lean approach to Beethoven's Concertos, avoid Barenboim/Klemperer.

Some listeners may not agree, but I believe Barenboim/Klemperer's Beethoven Concertos to be among the best, along with Ashkenazy/Solti (Decca); Rubinstein/Leinsdorf (RCA/ Boston Symphony); and for a more Classical approach free of Romantic excess, Perahia/Haitink (Sony).

How lucky we are that Daniel Barenboim began to mature as a great artist with Klemperer enjoying a glorious Indian summer. This is a miraculous recording. The 24-year-old Barenboim is a match for the magisterial Klemperer, who was almost three times the age of his precocious pianist. It's remarkable to find two artists of such different ages cooperating so well. And they're fully equals as well - this is a version of the Beethoven concertos with soloist as primus inter pares (to quote one reviewer). The Emperor has seldom sounded so grand. The orchestral playing is quite something as well.

Listening to these imaginative and ingratiating performances of the five Beethoven piano concertos, I marvelled at Barenboim's early maturity. He displays uncanny poise and confidence, fully equal to Klemperer's grand manner. Sadly, the mid-Sixties was about the last time I could connect with Barenboim, whose romantic tendencies, so impressively applied here, went off into caricature: he began to channel Furtwangler and hasn't stopped, despite the fact that it caused him to lose his best musical instincts. (His cycle of the Beethoven symphonies with the Berliner Staatskapelle is so stody and dull that it might as well join Furtwangler in the grave.)

That's irrelevant here. The amazing thing for me is that Barenboim proves so successful at making these overly familiar works sound fresh through pure musical insight of the kind Schnabel might have--every movement really speaks under his hands. As for Klemperer, his is simply the greatest condcuting ever found in a complete Beethoven cycle. I got more feeling from these CDs than from his at times ponderous symphony recordings. For example, in the slow movement of Concerto #2, pianist and conductor agree that the style should be mature Beethoven, with full sonority, measured tempos, and weightiness. That may sound like a bad idea in this Haydnesque early work, but by the time they build to the hushed, mysterious coda, we are transported to an inspired world. Throughout there is the same stamp of genuineness.

Barenboim eschews virtuoso gimmicks and never powers his way through the score. I must confess that I waited forty years to buy this set, on the assumption that Klemper would be inattentive and heavy-handed. How very wrong I was. This Beethoven cycle sets the gold standard.

For my taste, these were disappointing. The dynamic range is so great in the recording, you cannot easily find a comfortable volume. Softer passages are either lost or the sound becomes blaring. Yes, Klemperer is a grand master, but the Orchestra often sounds overly romantic and pompous for my ears. I have an Annie Fisher recording of the 3rd Concerto and every moment that makes that CD memorable is missing on this version of the 3rd. For example, there is a passage in the first movement that occurs twice. The piano hits several increasingly powerful octaves slightly behind the orchestra. Annie Fischer's final Octave is so powerful in that the pause leading up to it is greater and the depth of her conviction in solidly ringing it out is profound. On the Klemperer/Barenboim recording this monumental moment passes mostly unnoticed. Also, the piano has an almost harsh ringing sound. Infact, the entire recording has a supercharged high end that can be oppressive. I would also recommend the Ashkenazy, Mehta recording of the 4th and 5th. That recording has a warmth of orchestral sound that seems more natural to me. I also find that Barenboim and Klemperer do not seem to be seeing things eye to eye, especially in the 5th. Don't get me wrong, these are classic performances, I just will not reach for them as often as the others and I simply offer an opinion.

Excellent disc, on every aspect, sound, interpretations , everything, choral fantasy is just amazing. Although I prefer Karajan's Version of the 4th piano concerto i did love this disc, because i Think it is a reasonable price for a very good quality product.

Again the power of the old Klemperer bright like a spark in the dark sea of his no-rithm measures. A young and brilliant Baremboim that plays like the angels. Anyway, don't miss the Piano Con. n.5 conducted by Knapertbusch and played by Curzon for taste the glory.