Beethoven: Symphony No. 9 "Choral"

William Wildermann (Performer), Ludwig van Beethoven (Composer), Bruno Walter (Conductor), Nell Rankin (Performer), Columbia Symphony Orchestra (Orchestra), Westminster Choir (Orchestra), Emilia Cundari (Performer), Albert da Costa (Performer) | Format: Audio CD

Product Details

• Performer: William Wildermann, Nell Rankin, Emilia Cundari, Albert da Costa
• Orchestra: Columbia Symphony Orchestra, Westminster Choir
• Conductor: Bruno Walter
• Composer: Ludwig van Beethoven
• Audio CD (May 16, 1995)
• Number of Discs: 1
• Label: Sony
• ASIN: B000002A7S
• In-Print Editions: MP3 Download
• Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #186,479 in Music (See Top 100 in Music)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars The Ninth as personal, rather than cosmic, drama, October 12, 2006

By 

Alan (New York, NY) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Beethoven: Symphony No. 9 "Choral" (Audio CD)

This Bruno Walter Beethoven Ninth is not, to my ears, lacking in drama (as some of the other reviewers here feel). It's not a falsely revved-up drama; rather, it's one that grows out of the great detail that Walter gets from the Columbia Symphony so that at every moment some event seems to be happening.

I feel the drama right from the opening notes, which have great urgency, but which seem to be more about some personal tragedy than about the cosmos. Walter seems to view the work as a personal drama rather than a cosmic one.

After that powerful opening, Walter is soon shaping phrases and tempo in a most romantic, expressive way in accord with his vision of the internal drama. Walter makes the first movement a series of unpredictable events. It's the most compelling performance of this movement I've ever heard. Perhaps it's the variations in tempo that put off some people, they may hear a lack of energy or momentum. I hear intense concentration on the moment-by-moment drama. Walter's vision keeps me listening intently.

The scherzo is not savage or demonic, but rather conveys the sense that the hero, the main character of the symphony, is trying to rouse himself out of his depression and angst so that he can get stuff accomplished, while sometimes (during the trio) making fun of himself for getting carried away with his own energy and going too far. Should he try to enjoy things rather than being either depressed or intensely energetic? (I know this sounds silly, but this performance makes me think about the symphony in a way that I usually don't think about orchestral music. Maybe it's a silly way, but I don't care.)

No other performance I've heard conveys such a feeling of peace and grace in the third movement. It's mesmerizing. In phrasing, in balances, in slight tempo adjustments, Walter makes this movement cohere as few other conductors do. My concentration goes in and out during this movement in most recordings, but Walter and the Columbia Symphony keep me riveted.

As with so much in this performance, the dissonance at the beginning of the last movement seems not cosmic, but personal, internal. I can't explain why, but it does. When the orchestra starts playing the melody of the "Ode to Joy," it's as if the person whose journey is described in the symphony is trying to calm himself, to again connect with the joy and beauty in the world. When the dissonance returns, the only way he can respond is with words directly to the orchestra.

The nobility, tenderness, and caring quality of William Wildermann's opening solo sets the tone for the rest. This is conciliatory joy, less exultant, less wild than in some performances. I find it deeply communicative, a true plea for peace in the world.

The tenor solo does not sound militant or marchlike ("let's take a hike in the country in our lederhosen!"), as it does in many recordings, but seems like a deeply felt call to running your personal race in alignment with the universe, not against it.

The vocal soloists are not the starriest names but all sing superbly. The Westminster Choir sings with utter commitment, if not the most idiomatic German. Most of all, you feel that every participant in this performance was in tune with Walter's vision, all felt that something special was happening.

Energy does seem to flag a bit, to lack the necessary tension, during parts of the slow choral section starting with "Seid umschlungen, Millionen," but only during parts of it. Maybe Walter knew what he was doing even here, because the fast peroration that brings the symphony to its end feels more like a true climax than in many performances, though when it starts you might think it's a little too low-key. But Walter gives it a build so that it really comes to a climax on the final notes, something I don't feel in most recordings I've heard.

If you want a Ninth with a lot of external drama, this may not be for you. This is a more introspective Ninth. I'm not sure if I would have thought that was such a good idea before hearing this performance, but Walter makes it work beautifully. Listening to this performance, I feel as if Bruno Walter is still communicating to us from his own wealth of experience of life and music. I hear this famous symphony in a whole new way thanks to this recording.

5 of 7 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Walter's Beethoven Ninth at half-power, March 20, 2006

By 

Santa Fe Listener (Santa Fe, NM USA) - See all my reviews
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)    (HALL OF FAME REVIEWER)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Beethoven: Symphony No. 9 "Choral" (Audio CD)

When this stereo Beethoven Ninth was released in 1959, it replaced a much more vigorous version in mono from just a few years before with the New York Phil. and considerably better vocal soloists in the finale. You can still find historical versions of that prevoius performance (on Music & Arts, for example), as well as a live Ninth from the same era. But for official purposes this is the one that Sony has chosen to represent Walter's legacy.

It's a looser, less ocncentrated reading than his older ones. Walter lost considerable energy, particularly as a Beethoven conductor, in his autumnal period. It took seven recording sessions to finish the Ninth, five in Hollywood and two in New York for the last movement (the ad hoc Columbia Sym. in New York is entirely different from the L.A. band).

There's no doubt that Walter has authority in the Ninth, his favorite Beethoven symphony, which he first conducted at 22 in 1898 -- think of it, barely seventy years after the composer's death. Yet from the outset critics have doubted this performance, which is almost genial in its relaxed approach. But if you already enjoy Walter's late style, it is certainly present here. The orchestral forces sound a bit thin; the recording is quite good, however, as are the soloists and chorus in the finale. In truth the conducting is no more slack than in Walter's Eroica or Fifth Sym. from his Hollywood years. It's just that the Ninth requires as much concentration as anyone can bring to it, and the older Bruno Walter didn't have it to give anymore.

7 of 10 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars 1990 CBS release of this same recording, August 15, 2005

By 

Alan Majeska "Alan Majeska" (Bad Axe, MI, USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Beethoven: Symphony No. 9 "Choral" (Audio CD)

This is the only one of Bruno Walter's Columbia Symphony Orchestra Beethoven cycle I didn't like. I am referring to the 1990 CBS release, from the complete cycle. Movement I has some bad moments (cracked notes!) in the trumpets right before the final statement of the main theme/motif. II sounds sluggish, and as though orchestra and conductor aren't quite unanimous. IV suffers from the chorus too far back/off mike, slowish tempos, and vocal soloists off mike: not quite loud enough in balance with the orchestra and choir. Perhaps some of the balance problems are better in the "Bruno Walter Edition" re-release, but the tempo problems would be the same.

One critic described Walter's Columbia Symphony Beethoven 9th as "nearly a total disaster", and that's not a bad description given the excellent quality of the rest of his Columbia Beethovens: 3,4,5,6, and 7 are among the best ever, and 1,2,and 8 are close behind. The sound quality in Symphonies 1-8 is uniformly excellent, better than in 9.

Preferable, in my experience, for Beethoven's Ninth Symphony:Szell (Odyssey or Sony); Bohm/Vienna Philharmonic (1970, DG, coupled with Bohm's EROICA, and some Beethoven Overtures); Furtwangler/Philharmonia (Lucerne, 1954: Tahra label); Reiner/Chicago (RCA); Munch/Boston (EMI "Great Conductors of the 20th Century" - drawn from the 1958 RCA recording).

PS. September 2, 2005. I listened again to Walter's Beethoven Ninth Symphony, and now think my above review is too critical. I stand by the criticisms mentioned about IV: the soloists and chorus are off mike, Allegro parts need more drive. There is some untidy ensemble in IV, which detracts from the music. Walter is more affectionate than many conductors in this music, and there are some great moments in I, II and III. I guess I should say "recommended to Bruno Walter fans" or "proceed with caution."