- Buy a CD or a vinyl record, get a $1 Amazon MP3 Credit. Limit one promotional credit per customer. Here's how (restrictions apply)
| |||||||||||||||
Special Offers and Product Promotions
Frequently Bought Together
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
Track Listings
| 1. 1. Akt, 1. Szene- Langsam, Wozzeck, Langsam! | |||
| 2. Verwandlung. Orchester-Nachspiel | |||
| 3. 2. Szene- Du, Der Platz Ist Verflucht! | |||
| 4. Verwandlung. Orchester-Nachspiel Und Beginnende MilitÄRmusik Im Hintergrund | |||
| 5. 3. Szene- Tschin Bum ! HÖRst Bub- Da Kommen Sie! | |||
| 6. Verwandlung. Orchester-ÜBerleitung | |||
| 7. 4. Szene- Was Erleb' Ich, Wozzeck- | |||
| 8. Verwandlung. Orchester-Einleitung | |||
| 9. 5. Szene- Geh Einmal Vor Dich Hin | |||
| 10. 2. Akt- Orchester-Einleitung. 1. Szene- Was Die Steine GlÄNzen! | |||
| 11. Verwandlung. Orchester-Nachspiel | |||
| 12. 2. Szene- Wohin So Eilig, Geehrtester Herr Sargnagel- | |||
| 13. Verwandlung. ÜBerleitende Takte U. Kammerorchester-Einleitung. 3. Szene- Guten Tag, Franz - Ich Seh | |||
| 14. Verwandlung. ÜBerleitende Takte Und Orchester-Vorspiel (LÄNdler) | |||
| 15. 4. Szene- Ich Hab' Ein Hemdlein An, Das Ist Nicht Mein | |||
| 16. Verwandlung. Orchester-Nachspiel (Walzer) | |||
| 17. 5. Szene- Oh! Oh! Andres! Ich Kann Nicht Schlafen | |||
| 18. 3. Akt, 1. Szene- Und Ist Kein Betrug In Seinem Munde Erfunden Worden | |||
| 19. Verwandlung. Orchester-Nachspiel | |||
| 20. 2. Szene- Dort Links Geht's In Die Stadt | |||
See all 28 tracks on this disc
| |||
Editorial Reviews
Though initially believed to be very risky undertakings, these classic recordings of Wozzeck and Lulu and have been staples in Deutsche Grammophon's catalogue ever since they were first released on LP at different points during the 1960's. Conductor Karl Bohm very rarely performed or recorded 20th century repertoire regardless of the remarkable affinity he displays for it here. Evelyn Lear is ideally captivating in the role of Lulu and Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau's powerfully convincing Wozzeck is one for the ages. If you've previously shied away from these often challenging yet certainly worthwhile modern masterpieces waste not a moment in giving these outstanding legendary performances a try.
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
21 of 21 people found the following review helpful
By A Customer
Format:Audio CD
I received the LPs of both of these recordings in 1973 or 1974 for my birthday (I was 13 or 14 at the time), and I grew up loving them dearly (if can "love" such works). To this day, Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau will always be Wozzeck Gerhard Stolze will always be the Captain as far as I'm concerned. Unfortunately, the Lulu recording has been superseded by versions with Cerha's completion of the 3rd act (the best of which remains Boulez's classic 1979 [?] recording). But the entire set is worth it to get this classic Wozzeck.
28 of 32 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
Two masterworks from the years between the wars in a recording from the sixties
October 16, 2005
Format:Audio CD
I remember when Schoenberg, Webern, and Berg were spoken of as the New Viennese School and compared to Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven. Seriously. From our present standpoint, it is impossible to understand how much influence these three composers had in the mid-twentieth century. These two operas continue to be performed and through them Berg has become the most widely remembered of the three.
Scholars have analyzed these works extremely closely and have discovered all kinds of symbolic patterns in the notes. For example, the music occurring around Marie as she dies seems rather chaotic, yet one scholar has shown that the music consists of ten fragments of music heard from and around her earlier in the opera. So, her life is passing before her as she dies.
There is always a debate about how much of this deep meaning one can actually hear and it does vary for each listener. This kind of discussion goes on in all the arts, but is particularly so in music because it is the most abstract of the arts. How abstract and how removed from the surface can any "meaning" be and still be heard? This was a discussion we had many times in music school and I have met no more than a very few who convinced me they could actually hear this deeply (and this is more than recognizing a given row or its transformation or hearing the most fleeting tonalities in atonal works).
For me, just as some of the ultra late romantic become somewhat over composed with a level of detail that seems to be there for its own sake, some of this minutiae is like going to a restaurant for a meal and being given an essay about a photograph of a painting of a pork chop. It may be interesting, informative, and even beautiful, but you still leave hungry.
"Wozzeck" and "Lulu" are powerful and affecting works. They do sound much more like highly chromatic, but tonal works than the abstractions of Webern. "Lulu" is the more severe and, well, bleak of the two. I have heard more than a few praise these works for telling the truth about human life and getting to the true center of the human heart. To me, they seem more like artworks that were above all anti-bourgeois and seem proud of that stance. They seem to invoke not only the materialist views of the world of Marx, but also of Freud, and other now long forgotten apostles of deterministic thought. Is it possible to still see these works eighty years on as modern? They are as much prisoners of their time as are any other opera and less transcendent than I expect great works of art to be.
Franz Wozzeck is a powerless man who has a child out of wedlock with a woman named Marie. He subjects himself to crackpot scientific experiments with a Doctor for a bit of extra money for Marie and their son. Marie feels oppressed by the social stigma of being an unwed mother, but also has eyes for other men. She is particularly attracted to a Drum Major who looks so wonderfully masculine, but is really a mere surface of a person. She has an affair with the Drum Major, which Wozzeck discovers. Since Wozzeck is already teetering on the edge of sanity from his impotence and the experiments, he falls off and stabs Marie after she tells him that she would rather be stabbed than beaten. He leaves her body and tosses the knife in a pond. Later, crazed even more deeply by guilt, he goes into the pond after the knife and drowns. The last moment of the play involves Marie's and Wozzeck's orphan at play and running off the stage oblivious that he is alone in the world.
So, is this the true heart of us all? Is that last moment poignant, sharp irony on the human condition, or mere kitsch? I mean, dealing with the world view of this drama might benefit from as much detachment and irony as you can bring to it.
"Lulu" is even harsher. She is married to a professor of medicine who has a heart attack when he sees her with a painter he has commissioned to paint her portrait. She marries the painter at the urging of another doctor, who is engaged to another, with whom Lulu has had a long term love affair (such as love is in this work). Finally, the doctor understands that the painter really is blind to Lulu's true nature and tells him of her past. He kills himself. Under threat the doctor marries Lulu. She then takes up with a Countess who is enamored of her. Lulu ends up killing him with a revolver he has given her. She is arrested and sentenced to prison.
However, the countess arranges to take her place in prison to aid Lulu's escape. The Countess, the doctor's son, and an athlete help her escape abroad. Lulu then ends up with a wealthy man who ends up being a pimp and sells her to Cairo.
While the opera was incomplete at Berg's early death at fifty, the outline and sketch let us know that she is living in London with the doctor's son and the athlete. When the Countess arrives without money, Lulu is reduced to becoming a streetwalker. She goes through a series of clients who are the musical reincarnations of her various husbands. One of them kills the doctor's son, and the last kills both Lulu and the Countess, since he is Jack the Ripper (!).
The music is powerful and worth knowing because it is so personal to Berg and works its magic quite well. However, I have been at a symphonic concert when the Lulu Suite has been played and seem people get up and leave because they find it so harsh and intense.
Berg was indeed a major composer of the twentieth century. He cannot be merely dismissed. If you want to understand the serious art of that century you must come to terms with these works. You don't have to love them, but you cheat yourself if you don't know them at least a bit. Certainly, the morality of these operas, shocking in their time, is roughly equal to the "normal" behavior in any two episodes of "Friends" and "Law and Order". So, it must be the music that continues to affect people so strongly.
These recordings by Karl Böhm are masterfully done with great sound and solid singing. Some would prefer a different style of Sprechstimme (the half-singing) done here, but I find it appropriately chilling with the singing voice sliding around above the simultaneously sounding singing voice. I have no idea how it is done, but it sounds wonderfully insane.
Scholars have analyzed these works extremely closely and have discovered all kinds of symbolic patterns in the notes. For example, the music occurring around Marie as she dies seems rather chaotic, yet one scholar has shown that the music consists of ten fragments of music heard from and around her earlier in the opera. So, her life is passing before her as she dies.
There is always a debate about how much of this deep meaning one can actually hear and it does vary for each listener. This kind of discussion goes on in all the arts, but is particularly so in music because it is the most abstract of the arts. How abstract and how removed from the surface can any "meaning" be and still be heard? This was a discussion we had many times in music school and I have met no more than a very few who convinced me they could actually hear this deeply (and this is more than recognizing a given row or its transformation or hearing the most fleeting tonalities in atonal works).
For me, just as some of the ultra late romantic become somewhat over composed with a level of detail that seems to be there for its own sake, some of this minutiae is like going to a restaurant for a meal and being given an essay about a photograph of a painting of a pork chop. It may be interesting, informative, and even beautiful, but you still leave hungry.
"Wozzeck" and "Lulu" are powerful and affecting works. They do sound much more like highly chromatic, but tonal works than the abstractions of Webern. "Lulu" is the more severe and, well, bleak of the two. I have heard more than a few praise these works for telling the truth about human life and getting to the true center of the human heart. To me, they seem more like artworks that were above all anti-bourgeois and seem proud of that stance. They seem to invoke not only the materialist views of the world of Marx, but also of Freud, and other now long forgotten apostles of deterministic thought. Is it possible to still see these works eighty years on as modern? They are as much prisoners of their time as are any other opera and less transcendent than I expect great works of art to be.
Franz Wozzeck is a powerless man who has a child out of wedlock with a woman named Marie. He subjects himself to crackpot scientific experiments with a Doctor for a bit of extra money for Marie and their son. Marie feels oppressed by the social stigma of being an unwed mother, but also has eyes for other men. She is particularly attracted to a Drum Major who looks so wonderfully masculine, but is really a mere surface of a person. She has an affair with the Drum Major, which Wozzeck discovers. Since Wozzeck is already teetering on the edge of sanity from his impotence and the experiments, he falls off and stabs Marie after she tells him that she would rather be stabbed than beaten. He leaves her body and tosses the knife in a pond. Later, crazed even more deeply by guilt, he goes into the pond after the knife and drowns. The last moment of the play involves Marie's and Wozzeck's orphan at play and running off the stage oblivious that he is alone in the world.
So, is this the true heart of us all? Is that last moment poignant, sharp irony on the human condition, or mere kitsch? I mean, dealing with the world view of this drama might benefit from as much detachment and irony as you can bring to it.
"Lulu" is even harsher. She is married to a professor of medicine who has a heart attack when he sees her with a painter he has commissioned to paint her portrait. She marries the painter at the urging of another doctor, who is engaged to another, with whom Lulu has had a long term love affair (such as love is in this work). Finally, the doctor understands that the painter really is blind to Lulu's true nature and tells him of her past. He kills himself. Under threat the doctor marries Lulu. She then takes up with a Countess who is enamored of her. Lulu ends up killing him with a revolver he has given her. She is arrested and sentenced to prison.
However, the countess arranges to take her place in prison to aid Lulu's escape. The Countess, the doctor's son, and an athlete help her escape abroad. Lulu then ends up with a wealthy man who ends up being a pimp and sells her to Cairo.
While the opera was incomplete at Berg's early death at fifty, the outline and sketch let us know that she is living in London with the doctor's son and the athlete. When the Countess arrives without money, Lulu is reduced to becoming a streetwalker. She goes through a series of clients who are the musical reincarnations of her various husbands. One of them kills the doctor's son, and the last kills both Lulu and the Countess, since he is Jack the Ripper (!).
The music is powerful and worth knowing because it is so personal to Berg and works its magic quite well. However, I have been at a symphonic concert when the Lulu Suite has been played and seem people get up and leave because they find it so harsh and intense.
Berg was indeed a major composer of the twentieth century. He cannot be merely dismissed. If you want to understand the serious art of that century you must come to terms with these works. You don't have to love them, but you cheat yourself if you don't know them at least a bit. Certainly, the morality of these operas, shocking in their time, is roughly equal to the "normal" behavior in any two episodes of "Friends" and "Law and Order". So, it must be the music that continues to affect people so strongly.
These recordings by Karl Böhm are masterfully done with great sound and solid singing. Some would prefer a different style of Sprechstimme (the half-singing) done here, but I find it appropriately chilling with the singing voice sliding around above the simultaneously sounding singing voice. I have no idea how it is done, but it sounds wonderfully insane.
14 of 18 people found the following review helpful
By "clementi33"
Format:Audio CD
I had this recording of Berg's "Wozzeck" in the 1960s. I think I was 14. I remember the performance as being one of the greatest I'd ever heard (of anything). I'd rank it with Furtwangler's "Tristan" (which knocked me out, also!) The singing of Evelyn Lear and Fischer-Deskau is magnificent; they have real chemistry, also, something rare in opera. A cast and performance made in heaven. Ranks with the Boulez version.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
This WOZZECK is one of the Greats
This great, classic studio recording of Berg's first opera is the first one I heard, having bought the LPs based on reading a summary of the plot. Read more
Published on April 1, 2010 by Paul S. Rottenberg
5.0 out of 5 stars
Love, love, love this opera!
This cd set was in fine condition when it arrived. It exceeded my expectation. While Alban Berg is not for everyone, he is one of my favorite composers, and probably my favorite... Read more
Published on June 30, 2009 by Janny H. Hazelaar
2.0 out of 5 stars
My advice: resist the temptation
I agree with the other reviewer: Evelyn Lear is wrong for both roles. She lacks beauty and silkiness. Read more
Published on May 21, 2009 by Theodore Shulman
5.0 out of 5 stars
WOZZECK only (Lulu judgement suspended): fine singers, excellent...
NB, this review deals with "Wozzeck" only - I've yet to hear the Lulu recording; furthermore, that work at this time is almost unknown to me. Read more
Published on January 2, 2009 by Alexander Z. Damyanovich
5.0 out of 5 stars
Boehm's Wozzeck is easy on the ears...
This review applies to Wozzeck only. The Lulu recording is okay only...missing the Cerha third act (which hadn't been written yet) and with a soprano who cannot seem to manage the... Read more
Published on December 12, 2008 by E. Lyons
5.0 out of 5 stars
Opera music has become something new on the stage
This opera has become mythic in the world of the opera because it deals with a subject that is outrageous and frankly immoral. Read more
Published on January 16, 2008 by Jacques COULARDEAU
1.0 out of 5 stars
The worst Lulu ever
Evelyn Lear could make a fine Marina Mnsek for Boris, his voice is not for modern opera.
Published on January 19, 2007 by Martin Pitchon
5.0 out of 5 stars
This is an amazing opera
(This review only applies to "Lulu")
As you know, Alban Berg couldn't finished this opera, the 1-297 measures of the 3rd Act was being finished, but later, Berg, was written last... Read more
Published on November 22, 2003 by Sungu Okan
5.0 out of 5 stars
El mejor Wozzeck en la discografía
Esta versión dirigida por Karl Böhm y producida por Otto Gerdes es en mi opinión la mejor que existe en el mercado. Read more
Published on September 27, 2003 by Gustavo Chagoya Galaz
Listmania!
|
|
