Customer Reviews

Berlin: The Downfall 1945

5 star:		(2)
4 star:		(3)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(2)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

I would heartily recommend this book. It is good, well researched history well written. The author has a difficult task because although its not an academic history book there is a wide range in his audience of non-academics. There are many WWII enthusiasts out there willing to pounce on the slightest error in detailed command structure or technical detail of weapons and others, like myself who know little about the subject and would have appreciated a bit more explanation on certain points.

As a neophyte in this subject I would have appreciated better maps and perhaps photographs of some of the less well known characters. I know what Hitler and Goebbels and Stalin look like but pictures of Guderian, Konev, Chuikov, Wenck and Busse would have help me identify and keep track of who was who. Also a chart of the major army groups with the armies they comprised of and their commanders would have made it easy to get into. Be prepared to get the Atlas and encyclopaedias out it you want a deeper understanding of what's going on.

But all in all I'm grateful for this book which was given to me for Christmas both understanding the big movements and historical events and the way it gives a voice for the ordinary people. Its gripping reading too.

This book is a step by step account detailing events from the Russian invasion of East Prussia to the fall of Berlin in 1945. It reads like a descriptive list of events with precious little interpretation or commentary. There are pages upon pages that read like "... and the next day, some troops moved three feet to the left....." and so on. It also doesn't distinguish between key influential events of the battle and those that were ultimately inconsequential. Also, for a book whose primary focus is miltary logistics, it is woefully lacking in good quality maps.

It does a sobering portrayal of the brutality of invading Soviets towards the German popluace, and I think it is this that will remain the book's enduring contribution. But I think given the richness of history that this book has to work with as its core material, the prose could've been so much better.

The prospective reader of "Berlin:The Downfall 1945" by Antony Beevor will have to know that this book will for sure,leave nobody indifferent after reading it,no matter what his WWII creed is.
Its reading was surprisingly refreshing in that it provides the readers with a detailed account of the truly uncountable atrocities,capital "A" there,that the advancing Russian army commited against the German civilians,mostly women,mainly in the last months of the war.
Refreshing I say,in that the war crimes commited by the Allies had always been,and still are in many cases,unpopular in the mainstream media,to say the least.

There is of course,the other side to the book,a better known one,one with which the politically correct reader will find himself "at home" so to speak,and far more comfortable.
So,to make things eaven,Antony Beevor has resorted,as many other WWII writers of the like,to the quick use of negative adjectives and derogative terms,whenever adressing the portrayal of the leading person in Germany at the time,Chancellor and Reich Fuhrer Adolf Hitler ;be prepared dear reader to read,in this respect,the usual mainstream politically correct opinion about him,as for example when describing the well known image of a smiling Hitler caressing a teen soldier's ear in the gardens of the destroyed Chancellery,outside the Bunker,on his last outing a few days before the end of the War. Here, Antony Beevor feels free to bestow upon his readers his personal opinion of the scene when writing that Hitler caresses the young soldier's ear in the manner of a hardly repressed paedofile.(!!!)Will the learned and truth-seeking reader find this sort of remarks and personal opinions useful for a true account of the events? You dear reader,will have to say.Personally I'd just rather have "the facts" from the historian,not being told what to think of them by giving me the adjectives.The writer's opinion of the facts is to me of supranatural indifference,as for sure I'm old and wise enough to fill in "the adjectives" for facts,all by myself.
But then again,it's a matter of individual taste,isn't it?

After reading Stalingrad, by the same author, I bought the unabridged audio cassette version of this book - about ten hours long.
Like Stalingrad, it is a very vividly-written and well researched book that is both gripping and bleak.
Although horrifying in parts, it is a story that cannot be repressed and is more of an epic human tragedy than any movie can portray.
A compelling account of the last days of the third reich and the events that led to the start of the cold war.

History can be more dramatic and more exciting than fiction and this is an excellent example. I couldn't put this down and I came away with a deeper understanding of the end of the Third Reich, Stalin's role, and a sense of the experience of civilians in Germany and Poland in those crucial and horrible weeks.

Following on from Stalingrad, which I found quite gripping, Berlin: The Downfall is a little less so. Events are reduced more to a straightforward description, and because of the large number of fronts, armies and battles involves this is a bit hard to follow.

Initially, I felt a little cheated that we skipped from Stalingrad to the invasion of Germany. I would have appreciated some coverage of the time in between.

This book has a lot more maps and photos than Stalingrad did, and the maps are more precise, but they are still lacking in landscape details (relief, swamps, forests). Likewise though there are more photos, they are not more comprehensive: there are no photos of many important people and places.

Ultimately also, the outcome of this seems rather obvious from the beginning; whereas Stalingrad was a desperate battle that either side could have won, at this point in time the Russians were triumphantly sweeping the Germans away through numbers and weaponr;, even though the Germans were still an effective military force they had no hope. And of course the downfall of Hitler and the Nazis has been covered elsewhere in more detail.

So all in all, while well written and about an interesting time, not as compelling as the previous book.

A good, authoritative book - but falls somewhat short of Beevor's 'Stalingrad'.

'Berlin: The Downfall, 1945' is a thorough and well-rounded book that gives detailed insights into the events before, during and after the attack on Berlin. With every page I sympathised more and more with the German or Soviet soldier - with Soviet soldiers being treated like cannon-fodder, and Wehrmacht soldiers desperately fighting a losing battle against a vengeful and bloodthirsty enemy. In this sense, Beevor gave a commendably broad presentation of the different types of people caught up in this horror. Key figures and generals were represented on all sides; however, the experiences of common soldiers or common people - children, young girls, housewives, old people, etc - were not forgotten or overlooked. In this way, I felt that 'Berlin' captured the mood and the feel of this highly tragic part of the war.

One point of interest: Comparing the two books ('Stalingrad' Vs 'Berlin') really makes it seem as if the Germans seldom raped whereas the Russians were doing it constantly. I still find it hard to accept that such a portrayal can be balanced; although perhaps ideological and disciplinary differences do account for it somehow. Hard to believe, is all I'm saying.

Several other reviewers have commented that better maps should have been provided. I agree with them. I also agree with one reviewer who said that some photos of lesser-known characters would have been useful in order to keep up with their progress. Nevertheless, 'Berlin' must surely rate as one of the better written World War Two histories. It was not a book to put down.

I had tears in my eyes as I began compiling this review, shortly before finishing the book. The suffering which it relentlessly and rather coolly lays out seems on the one hand as if it ought to be unimaginable. On the other hand, it sounds no different to accounts of the 30 Years War, except with the addition of industrial-scale killing machinery. Germany has seen this before, and at least in the mid-20th Century had still not learned from the experience.

Beevor follows up "Stalingrad" with "Berlin". So did the Russians. One Red Army member in Stalingrad angrily shouted at a prisoner that Berlin would one day look like this. And so it came to pass. The concentrations of artillery used on the Eastern Front and in the offensive against Berlin itself are staggering - upwards of an artillery piece per four metres of front. Beevor's style conveys repressed excitement and horror at the story he narrates, matter-of-fact and dry and yet rivetting. I flew through the book in half the time this many pages would normally require.

The story of the Red Army in its unstoppable march to Berlin is punctuated by the the pounding not only of guns, but of rape. Rape on an unimaginable scale. From teenage girls to women in their 80s, the surprisingly undisciplined soldiers of a politically prudish state used the bodies of women as proxies for revenge as soon as they ran out of Wehrmacht and SS to kill. Russian women soldiers watched and laughed. Liberated Jews, communists, civilians - none were spared. As ever before, a victorious army scorched the Earth it passed over with rape and pillage, comprehensively asset-stripping the civilian population to send trophies home and taking women as further spoils. 2 million women may have been raped during the conquest and one report from Berlin estimates that of 100,000 rape victims, 10,000 died. Mainly by suicide. The survivors from the Eastern parts of Germany were then dragged off to forced labour in the USSR, only half of whom returned alive. Suicide, desperate attempts to flee to the comparative safety of the Western occupation, disease and unimaginable suffering were the results of this storm of brutality. And German women knew this was coming. Even though they often had no conception of what had been done in Russia, the rumours flew ahead of the advancing Russian formations.

What truly defies belief is the sheer self-destructive futility with which the Nazi state hung on to the last building. Much of this can be attributed to Hitler's character, which seems to have degenerated into a pathological self-identification with the German nation - there was no point in saving Germany because he was Germany, and his death the end of the German Volk which he hurled onto the conflagration just to see it burn with him. How an entire nation could have been co-opted into this insane tenacity is not so easy to explain away, on the other hand, but the murderous brutality of the Felgendarmerie and SS goes a long way. Tens of thousands of soldiers and civilians alike were pointlessly executed for failing to show sufficient devotion to a lost war, or just on the vague suspicion. Prepare to confront some inner darkness while reading this account.

One big surprise was finding that Hitler's body had actually been found, and kept in the USSR until 1970, when it was secretly burned and ground up to be flushed away into the sewers, perhaps appropriately. The rumours of Hitler sneaking off to Latin America were the result of deliberate policy by Stalin. Poor Zhukov, as near as this story comes to producing a hero, was kept in the dark for 20 years and expected to explain away the disappearance to the allies purely to humiliate the man. I always knew that Stalin, Hitler and Beria were archetypal brutes, but I didn't expect to see just how much they resembled spiteful children.

Ultimately, the fascist demagogues that expected every German to fight to the last drop of blood either tried to sneak off in civilian clothes, committed suicide or both. Only Bormann met the guns of the Russians and that was by accident while seeking to escape from the Berlin Kessel. This is humanity at its most tawdry, but there are glints of light here and there. The Red Army soldier appears to have been an extraordinary barrel of contradictions, prepared to rape and loot, yet sentimental about children, ready to share his last piece of bread and laying down quietly to die "as if it were also part of his work". This generation are a true enigma. The standard of the Red Army was raised over the Reichstag before the upper floor had been cleared of suicidally fanatical SS, reminding me of the Muslims raising Saladin's standard on the battlement of Jerusalem - and that humankind has perhaps not come so far in all that time.

This is rivetting and harrowing modern history, told by a master.

REVIEW OF THE BRAZILIAN EDITION

a median book, with the same problems of Stalingrad, by the same author.

the highly well detailed description of all movements of the russian, german , british and american armies can be a good thing for military historicians, but not for me. in my mind i keep , from this book, only the images of personal dramas of the soldiers and civilians.

the maps that come in the book doesn't help too. My first critique is about their location... they are all located in the inital pages of the book, but instead, they could have been placed in strategical points during the reading, (for instance, in each battle)which turns the reading tiresome. They are also all in monochromatic print, which results in an extreme difficult interpretation. What is a british, american, german, russian army? god only knows.

the reader must have, too, a great knowledge of the european geographical accidents, as the author makes several references to them, and again the maps doesn't help too...

Sorry for the bad english. i am a brazilian. :P