Most Helpful Customer Reviews
12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Buyer: Be Aware, September 4, 2001
By A Customer
I was terribly disappointed by this collection. I am an avid fan of the "Best of..." series, both the short story and poetry annual collections, and wished I had read through this collection before I purchased it. That would have told me just how much "intellectual passion" as opposed to "pleasure" these poems would present. There is a lot of poetry of ideas and form and what feels like postmodern self-conscious gimmickry, but little true emotion or connection to the human experience. And no, I am not an "old fogey moon-june" poetry lover. I love experimentation in poetry. But I feel hoodwinked by Hass' choices (and hey-why didn't he tell us in his nice introduction that his wife was in here!??). Much of this is a poetry in love with language and ideas, but not the connection they must make with sensation and experience in order to move a reader. It's not that the poems are difficult to read through--much great poetry is after all, and much great poetry originally broke the "rules"-- but many of these poems I found thoroughly, frustratingly, truly incomprehensible until I read the author comments in the back. And these notes were at times laughable in their ostentation and/or pitiable in their affectedness. They explain the poem in many cases, but what were we expected to do without these author remarks? In fact, some of these author comments read like indispensable footnotes, not enlightenment on the artistic experience. All is not lost. The Ashberry and Bishop and Koch, among others, are marvelous, and proof that a great poet doesn't need afterwords or explanatory remarks and footnotes in order to make meaning out of their poetry. And since Ashberry, for example, rarely makes "sense" in the obvious way, it is not that events need to be spelled out in order of poetry to be moving. But it must have an element of emotion in order to please this reader, not just language that sounds good put together or ideas that only mean something to the writer and must be explained in detail. Anyway, there are many out there who will certainly love this collection-mostly critics and graduate students and professors, is my guess (and I just graduated recently from a writing program, so I know whereof I speak). But more and more these people determine the direction poetry is taking, so it is informative to read this collection for that reason if none other. But save your money if any of my comments mean something to you, or at least read through this at the bookstore before buying. If you are disappointed by this collection, try the "Best of American Poetry..." that anthologizes the earlier decades. It is a wonderful collection.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Another fantastic installment, September 24, 2001
BAP 2001 continues the tradition established by previous volumes by presenting great poetry from well-known, lesser-known, and unknown American poets. True, no annual volume of poetry can collect all of the "best" poems published that year, but the BEST AMERICAN POETRY series comes awfully close. This collection is just as diverse as past collections: John Ashbery shuffles alongside Thomas Sayers Ellis, Billy Collins plays in the snow, Anne Carson longs, watching Christopher Edgar drifting in the clouds. Donald Hall's poem "Her Garden" is heartbreaking and nearly perfect. Yusef Komunyakaa, Haryette Mullen, and Robert Bly also show up and there's a beautiful banter abounding. David Lehman has written another funny and insightful foreword and Robert Hass fulfills the guest editor's job of distancing himself as much as possible from the claim of the series' title. This is a fantastic collection, an indespensible series, and one that should be read if you want to discover the current, vibrant, thriving state of American poetry.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
pretty academic, January 29, 2002
By A Customer
If, very generally, the world is divided into experimental-elliptical and narrative-lyric poetry, then Hass, who has finally realized poetry has changed since he was a boy, is trying to reflect that. Everyone knows these books aren't really books of bests, they're books of trends and tend to be a bit behind the curve. Admitting that, there's no reason to be getting excited here. Rita Dove's was good, this one's eh. It's not the preponderance of more oblique, non-narrative stuff that's the problem--there's a fair amount of dreary gabble, but there are also some electric pieces--Szporluk's series of metaphors has energy, though the last two lines are right out of I-am-woman-hear-me-roar; Lydia Davis is intense and nifty and fun; etc., etc. Where Hass falls down on the job is in picking poetry of more traditional pleasures: most of the clearer narrative pieces are sentimental and unenergetic. It's as if to Hass, the new can only be the elliptical--can't be in a narrative mode that has different sound, sentiment or idea from what he does himself. Alan Feldman's piece, for example, is a namedropping and overlong bit of tripe the point of which seems to be the poet reassuring himself that his mother loved him. Of course there are Kalytiak-Davis, Anne Carson, McHugh, Stewart and a few others who are working outside all the usual boxes, and their work is always fun to read. Gluck is the real thing, and her poem Time is, I think, from her latest book, which is her best so far. Young is fun, as usual; Bernard Welt's "I stopped writing poetry" might be the freshest, funniest and also--to poets anyhow--poignant thing in here. Sayers Ellis is fine--he's a good poet--though I've seen other work by him that I like much more. But other than that you could almost go through this book and say, without checking the bios, this one teaches here, this one got their mfa here, and do it almost to the date. That is to say, what an academic bunch of stuff! I guess that's a pretty accurate reflection of what's going on today, but I think Dove, last year, produced an anthology which found more new voices which couldn't be pigeonholed quite as easily, while her taste in older voices at least tended to lead her to their better stuff.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|