Customer Reviews

Best 357 Colleges, 2005 Edition (College Admissions Guides)

5 star:		(5)
4 star:		(3)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

This book chages very little from last year's or previous years' editions.

This guide book is much better than:
1) The Fiske Guide to Colleges - this book says something good about every college and rarely anything bad. So, after reading the book, you still don't know which schools to choose from. This makes it is very hard for a prospective student to distinguish one school from another.

2) The US News & World Report College guide - the rankings and ratings are done by college presidents and professors. Since when are college presidents heavily involved in academics? They are hired to do administrations and fund raising, not academics. If anything, they only have vague and general ideas of how other schools are. It is ridiculous to ask them to rank and rate other colleges. Much more, where are the inputs from the college students? Their experiences are the ones that count and should be a big part of any rankings and ratings.

3) Choosing the Right College - this book focuses on the curriculum and political atmosphere of each campus. But it is the outcome of an education that is important, not the curriculum or the political atmosphere.

4) College Board guide - this book contains only statistics and percentages - it contains no descriptions about colleges. It provides no critiques for colleges.

The descriptions in this book for each college are accurate and to the point. It relies primarily on inputs from the students. While this is very valuable, it could be greatly improved if feedbacks from the professors are also included.

There is only one guide book that is better than this book:
Getting into the Right College - by Edward B. Fiske and Bruce G. Hammond.

This book is a pretty good compromise between facts and opinion, but it's not flawless. While it does a substantially better job than US News & World Report, a few of Princeton Review's ratings and sidebars probably need to be improved. Here are some examples:

First, what does an "admissions selectivity" rating of four stars mean? To many it means that the school has a four star reputation and admission to a "four-star" school will open doors to grad schools and job opportunities. To others it means that their sons and daughters who don't have A averages ought to think of applying elsewhere.

The problem is that schools like Harvard and Elon College both receive four stars. No one is saying that Elon is anything but a good school, but it's a bit misleading if it makes students think their shot at getting into Elon is only a few little points better than getting into Harvard. Then there's the problem of interpreting selectivity. Princeton Review says that the percentage of admitted students who enroll at George Washington is low while Millsaps College has a high percentage of acceptees who enroll. Meanwhile, according to their own statistics GW has an acceptee enrollment rate of 32% while Millsaps is at 30%. What's up with that? Barron's does a much better job with accurate, understandable selectivity.

As far as awarding academic stars, it's very interesting to note the pronounced differences between public and private universities. If you analyze Princeton Review's findings, your conclusion will be "you get what you pay for." Students apparently get lost in the shuffle at big public universities and teachers are largely inaccessible. A three-star academic rating for a public university is really quite excellent while three stars is a bit low for a private school.

However, student opinion skews the ratings against schools known for engineering and sciences. Very high-powered schools like CalTech, Case Western, Johns Hopkins and Cooper Union all received only three stars despite very favorable student-teacher ratios and very low levels of classes taught by TA's (if any). Are these low ratings the result of having many foreign professors who are difficult to understand? Could it be that students were forced to go into the sciences by their parents and didn't really want to go to CalTech in the first place? Princeton Review doesn't do enough to explain why students might feel less than fully satisfied.

Another problem is their sidebar of competing schools. If you look at George Washington University, the sidebar will tell you that students offer prefer Boston University over GW. Then if you look at BU's, it says that students often prefer GW. Can you have it both ways? Much more confusing is the phrase "students rarely prefer" because it can mean two very different things. It could mean that there is heavy overlap in applicant pools, but student rarely pick the second school or it could mean there is rarely an overlap, but if there is, the student will usually pick the second school.

Princeton Review is better than a lot of the guides when it comes to finances. Some books, such as Fiske, don't mention specific tuition costs. Princeton Review analyzes each school's financial aid policies pretty well. Princeton Review does not match Fiske when it comes to information on each school's strongest departments.

The book also does a better job than many at showing student perspective which is helpful, but readers should remember that college students are often world champions at sarcasm. I think students would prefer this book over something dry that only presents facts, but this book pays too much heed to its own opinion to be considered truly unbiased.

Having gone through the college application process with 4 children, this is absolutely the best book on the market. Quick, concise, to the point. In 2 pages they usually capture the essence of the school. Bought 3 or 4 different years along the way.

The Best 357 Colleges is, more than anything else, a fun book to look through. I am a first year student at Arizona State University and have intentions to transfer after my sophmore year to a New England school. I picked this book up to see what kind of information was given about some of the colleges I am looking into. The book does a better than expected job of giving the reader a sense of what the school may be like, but it gives positive only reviews to the overwhelming majority of the schools in there. They are the "best" 357 schools, but with the exception of the Application Process, all of the schools could seemingly be described with the same generic explanations.
Away from the lack of realistic and necessary criticism, I still enjoyed the book. SO full of information about so many school, and a very easy and even fun book to follow. All of the school's contact information is in there, along with all of their application requirements and deadlines. Costs, demographics, most popular majors, and even information about the amount of people that smoke, drink, study, participate in sports is made very visible in The Best 357 Colleges. The Best 357 Colleges is great guide to basic facts and information about colleges and would definitely be a great guide to prospective college students trying to gather as much information as they can before the approaching application deadlines.

This is the best college guide for students with SAT scores above 1100. I don't reccomend it for students will lower scores because it concentrates on schools that expect a higher SAT.
This book rates college on academic as well as social factors so you can see if you fit in to that campus. You can read about dorms, party atmosphere, and what current students are like.

One feature that I felt was great was... "if you like a certain college you may want to look at"... This allows you to add new schools to consider.

My high school daughter continually used this book to make her choice. I highly reccomend this book!

The nice thing about this book is its philosophy of asking the students at the schools to rate the colleges they attend. That way you get the low down on things like the quality of life, cafeteria food, social life, political leaning, all in all some 60 categories. That's in addition, of course to the standard information that you'd get from the school itself like admissions criteria, deadlines, phone numbers etc.

You've got to enjoy some of the categories in which colleges are ranked:

Under Politics:
Students Most Nostalgic for Ronald Reagan
Students Most Nostalgic for Bill Clinton
Students Most Politically Active
Election? What Election?

Under Food:
Great Campus Food
Is This Food?

I'm not quite sure just how they picked 357 colleges (.357 Magnum Perhaps) instead of 358 or 401, but you gotta stop somewhere.

Easily one of the best college reference books.

The Princeton Review Best 357 colleges is a fun read.

Whether it's an accurate selection of the 357 best or a clear portrayal of what the chosen few have to offer is another matter. It's impossible to tell, though the valuable commentary you get in the Princeton Review is a good supplement to factual date you can get from the schools in question and from other sources.

In working with my two college-bound sons, we paired this work with the much more statistically-inclined Barron's guide and some campus visits. They work together effectively.

The Princeton Review gives you some pretty crude but interesting classification of colleges and universities into groupings like 'Diversity lacking on campus', 'Students are happy' (valium usage up again?), and 'Great food on campus'.

This is all great fun as far as it goes. But you'd be foolish to base too much of your decision on this one book.

One very helpful category is called 'Applicants also look at and often prefer ...' , '... and sometimes prefer ... ', and '... and rarely prefer ...'

I find this feature helpful in figuring out which schools appeal to distinct groups of students and what the pecking order is considered to be.

The Princeton Review is worth your money as long as you triangulate on the schools that interest you by using additional sources of information.

This is a great guide for getting a feel for the differences between colleges. Surveying the students gives good environmental info (i.e. requirements for admission, specialties, overall environment : liberal, conservative, religious affiliation etc.) Especially if you have a child with a variety of interests and no clear college favorite, you can use this guide to whittle down the universe of colleges to a manageable level.

The Princeton Review's Best 357 Colleges has two pages on each of its covered colleges, which includes pretty much every college a student would consider in the college search process. Its commentary on academics, student body, and quality of life is composed almost entirely of student opinions, which is good and bad: the good part is that it provides a casual, honest perspective from a relevant source, but the bad part is that the commentary is one-sided and contains no input from administrators, professors, or alums. Also, each section tends to expose many negative points about each school that tend to overshadow the benefits.
This book, in short, should not be used as the definitive source on a college. There are some schools that I have visited and loved that are portrayed as mediocre and somewhat undesirable in this book. The most useful parts of this book are the straight numbers detailing the average SAT and ACT scores, tuition, student population breakdown, etc., but these can be obtained online at www.princetonreview.com for free. All in all, this is a somewhat helpful book in the college search process but could be made much better by more comprehensive views. It is best when used in conjunction with the Fiske Guide to Colleges, which is a better source in my opinion, and the U.S. News and World Report "America's Best College" book.

This is a must have for any high schooler considering college. Helpful for parents too!