5.0 out of 5 stars
TWO BLACK PHILOSOPHERS LOOK AT SLAVERY IN AMERICA, December 10, 2010
This review is from: Between Slavery and Freedom: Philosophy and American Slavery (Blacks in the Diaspora) (Paperback)
Howard McGary is Professor of Philosophy at Rutgers State University in New Jersey. Bill E. Lawson is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Memphis.
They state in the Preface to this 1992 book, "The work started out as a philosophical examination of two slave narratives:
My Bondage and My Freedom: The Autobiography of Frederick Douglass (Timeless Classic Books) and
Twelve Years a Slave: (An African American Heritage Book). Along the way we realized that there were some recurring concepts that needed to be examined. The decision was made to examine several crucial ethical and social notions armed with what we took to be valuable but neglected insights gained from slave narratives as well as commentaries on slavery and philosophic analysis. This work is the result of our labor."
Here are some quotations from the book:
"It would be foolish to contend that there were no positive human interactions between slaves and slaveholders, or that slaveholders had no motive for doing things that benefited slaves. Clearly, after the abolition of the slave trade in 1808, slaveholders had good self-interested reasons for looking out for the welfare of their slaves." (Pg. 17)
"Even if it were the case that slaveholders genuinely believed that slavery was paternalistic, it does not follow that it WAS paternalistic. Historians must separate mere rationalizations and gross self-deception from reality." (Pg. 22)
"If I am right that courage involves taking risks that can not be described as minor, then clearly some acts of resistance will not qualify as courageous acts. When we are informed about the full range of acts of resistance to slavery, then we will see that in the day-to-day acts of resistance, courage was not always the issue." (Pg. 54)
"But a careful reading of Locke's work and an insightful reading of black history support, as do our laws on citizenship, the conclusion that politically unprotected blacks in the United States are citizens and, as such, have legal obligations to the state. Just as important, the United States has obligations to blacks." (Pg. 70)
"What is important is that there is no word in English that can be used to characterize the plight of the descendents of slaves in our society. What is wanted is something on a par with 'refugee.'" (Pg. 89)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Thought provoking view on slavery, November 3, 2000
This review is from: Between Slavery and Freedom: Philosophy and American Slavery (Blacks in the Diaspora) (Paperback)
I had Dr. Lawson for a class as an undergraduate at Michigan State University. This book looks at slavery in ways that most people wouldn't ever think of. It bring up various arguments as to what was the defining mark of slavery. Lawson himself argues that the oppression of humans was the defining mark. I didn't agree with all the agruments in this book, the arguments are thought provoking and worth giving time and thought to.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No