Hadley Arkes argues that it is necessary to move "beyond the Constitution," to the principles that stood antecedent to the text, if we are to understand the text and apply the Constitution to the cases that arise every day in our law.
| ||||||||||||||||||
Hadley Arkes argues that it is necessary to move "beyond the Constitution," to the principles that stood antecedent to the text, if we are to understand the text and apply the Constitution to the cases that arise every day in our law.
"No thinker today brings greater intellectual verve and subtlety to delineating the connections between law and moral judgment than Hadley Arkes."--Richard John Neuhaus, President, Institute for Religion and Public Life
"The most significant work on the Constitution in the decade since John Ely's Democracy and Distrust . . . .Beyond the Constitution is 'must' reading."--Gerard V. Bradley, University of Illinois, College of Law
"That whose soul is brevity has been bestowed on Hadley Arkes in abundance . . . . [The] founding fathers would recognize in Arkes a kindred spirit. Here erudition and common sense are combined and bad arguments get what they deserve. One is reminded of Aristotle's definition of wit--well-bred insolence."--Ralph McInerny, University of Notre Dame
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
23 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Brilliant,
By A Customer
This review is from: Beyond the Constitution (Paperback)
Hadley Arkes is, simply put, a national treasure and one of the great thinkers in America today. This illuminating look at constitutional law builds upon the good professor's previous writings on natural law. Simply put, Arkes rejects the notion that all of the answers to constitutional issues can be found in the text of that document. Instead, we must move to the principles that stood antecedent to its adoption. Professor Arkes feels that judges have lost the ability or willingness to engage in this task, which has led to an odd result: both liberal and conservative jurists alike now advocate an extreme form of moral relativism. The liberals advocate judicial activism to overturn legislation based on the fact that government cannot favor one view of right and wrong, while conservatives argue for judicial restraint on the basis that what is "right" is what the majority thinks at that time. It suffices to say that Arkes is hostile to both views, believing that right and wrong can be determined through reason. This leads to some very interesting discussions on such areas such as federalism and the wisdom of the Bill of Rights. Like all of Arkes's work, the writing is accessible to even those who are relatively new to the area of law and philosophy and never lacking in cleverness.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|