From Library Journal
Murphy (law, Duquesne) begins with a brief history of patriarchal attitudes toward women, but claims that men, of whom more is required, have had a harder time of it. He appears to have little awareness of the complexities of feminism as he depicts all women as either cosmic feminists or radical feminists and equates men with civilization and women with nature. Men have "ideals" and aspirations and are capable of abstract thought. Radical feminists critiquing the judicial system do not appreciate objectivity and are only interested in individual happiness as evidenced by their pro-choice stand, which is antithetical to the general good. Too much is attempted here, and the result is superficial treatment. The last chapter on love is particularly prolix and saccharine. Not recommended.?Sharon Firestone, Ross-Blakley Law Lib., Arizona State Univ., Tempe
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Review
Opens up a new conversation between the sexes based on the recognition that neither is superior to the other, that each is profoundly different, and that, although each person strives for autonomy, a 'vital interdependence' is unavoidable. -- Theological Studies
--This text refers to the
Hardcover
edition.
