3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Right About Race, July 2, 2007
This review is from: The Bhagavad-Gita in Black and White: From Mulatto Pride to Krishna Consciousness (Paperback)
Charles Michael Byrd is the bravest, most original thinker and writer currently fighting on the racial front. In The Bhagavad-Gita in Black and White, Mr. Byrd makes a sincere attempt to blend Vedic teachings from his beloved Bhagavad-gita, the so-called Hindu Bible, with a modern, multiracial perspective. In so doing, he wants readers to avoid a pitfall he states clearly and repeatedly: religion without philosophy is sentimental and therefore fanatical; philosophy without religion is mental speculation.
Throughout the book, Byrd maintains a delicate balance between traditional religion and multiracial philosophy--not an easy task. Along the way, he offers many valuable insights. For instance, he urges those experiencing hatred born of skin color to realize that God loves them and that their happiness will not come from being loved by everyone in the world, but rather from "the One who is the source of everyone and everything in the world--the Father of every living being." In this passage, he clearly identifies the origin of his own phenomenal strength and individualism.
In addition to racial hatred, Byrd takes racial love to task. He discounts the contemporary racial self-esteem movement (aka black pride) as "meaningless and do[ing] nothing to combat racism." And he boldly asserts ongoing legislative solutions to curing racism are akin to treating "cancer with band-aids."
Another of Byrd's many telling observations pertains to America's most segregated hour, church service on Sundays. He calmly states the following: "It indicates that the people who lead the churches and the followers who attend them are all racist, because they all identify the body as the self. The ones who go to the black churches identify themselves as being black, and the ones who go to the white houses of worship identify themselves as being white. This is ignorance."
Zeroing in on religious leaders--including Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Joseph Lowery--Byrd asks this question: "If we define religion as the development of love for God, or if we say that religion is about all of humanity finding relationship to one higher source, what business, then, does any religionist have engaging in the sordidness of racial identity politics?" Amen, brother!
Expanding on his longstanding concept of racelessness, Byrd warns everyone against pledging allegiance to any racial, ethnic or cultural group, as well as any political party supposedly serving identity-centered interests. He says of group members and supporters that "what matters at day's end is what they think about themselves as individuals, not what official racial or ethnic representatives tell them they should think."
Lest anyone assume this book is all seriousness and devoid of humor, there are humorous passages. When discussing his role model, author Jean Toomer, Byrd proposes that if Mr. Toomer lived today and chose his controversial, non-black identification, the NAACP who probably declare, "While we're sensitive to Mr. Toomer's right to not locate himself within traditional definitions and classifications, we feel that, if it became popular, his philosophy would have a deleterious effect on the black community in the aggregate and would signal the end of Affirmative Action!"
Byrd also recalls a conversation with his maternal grandmother, who gave him this advice: "Even though I was white-complexioned, I was really black. It's just that God didn't leave me in the oven long enough." (I suppose that was also her way of saying that so-called white folks are half-baked.)
This book is on its firmest footing when Byrd discusses his multiracial experiences, whether they be appearances on Tony Brown's Journal or The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, or his ground-breaking Multiracial Solidarity March on Washington in 1996, and some of the many conferences that followed. If there is a problem with this book, it is the lack of more anecdotal content to offset its preponderance of Hindu religious thought. As a longtime admirer of Mr. Byrd, this reviewer is keenly aware of his rich history of salient racial experiences and published commentary. Therefore, this could have been a meatier serving of first-person experiences and thoughts seasoned with only a dash of Vedic teachings. But maybe that's too much to ask of a devout vegetarian who really wants to expose the rest of us to the life-changing wisdom of Vaishnava philosophy. In that sense, Mr. Byrd, Namaste! (I bow to the divine in you.)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A much needed book, October 1, 2007
This review is from: The Bhagavad-Gita in Black and White: From Mulatto Pride to Krishna Consciousness (Paperback)
"Spiritual realization is a process of learning who we are and what we are not. It can take years to throw off the yoke of social condition, but the reward is in realizing your eternal constitutional position as a child of God, not as a pawn in the game of racial identity politics."
A lot has been done with the Gita in our little movement. And I think that's great. Take the Legend of Bagger Vance. Not bad. I totally don't get the golf thing, but that's not important here.
What's important is that yesterday the book The Bhagavad-Gita in Black and White; From Mulatto Pride to Krishna Consciousness came into the bookstore I own. It's authored by Charukrishna dasa (Charles Michael Byrd) who is, bodily, of black, white and Cherokee heritage. Charukrishna, before becoming a devotee, was a proponent of mixed-race pride.
The book is laid out into 18 chapters, each titled as the corresponding Bhagavad-gita chapter (Ch. 7 is Knowledge of the Absolute). Charukrishna prabhu then picks out a verse or two, gives a very nice explanation based upon Srila Prabhupada's gita. After he finishes his purport, he then explains how it relates to our society's perception of race.
I started picking through the book last night, figuring that since I'm white and have very little experience with the black community, I couldn't possibly relate. But after reading a bit, I'm really getting it.
It's amazing that even through all this social conditioning that I, a white boy from farm country, was having the same realizations about race, racism and race pride that a mixed-race fellow from Virginia turned mixed-race pride advocate was having.
A lot of what he is saying in the book is fairly politically incorrect. But I challenge anyone to say he's wrong about how the race card is used against us ("us" meaning all people).
For example, in his Bhagavad-gita 7.5 section, he first explains, exactly as Srila Prabhupada does, that living entities are of a superior energy of the Supreme. He also quotes the same Srimad Bhagavatam verse (10.87.30) as Prabhupada. He discusses false ego and how to become fully Krishna conscious. Just like Srila Prabhupada's purport.
He next applies this to race-consciousness. And this is where it can get a bit dodgy for the liberals amongst us.
"The clamor over hate-crime legislation is a perfect example of how competing racial and ethnic divisions - brought about by impious souls diverting their minds to illusory pursuits such as racial pride and superiority - are tearing our country asunder. In the aftermath of the vicious dragging death of James Byrd, Jr. in 1998 by three white supremacists in Jasper, Texas, NAACP President Kweisi Mfume said the case "clearly shouts across the world for the urgent need of this Congress to move quickly to strengthen and to pass anti-hate legislation." As I wrote in "A Guilty Verdict in Jasper," Mfume's remarks border on the preposterous, as if to say that Byrd would still be alive today if Texas had anti-hate legislation on the books and if his killers knew of it beforehand.
"Although anti-hate legislations may result in courts meting out heftier sentences after the face, these laws won't resurrect the dead. Why is there no emphasis on reconstructing race, on teaching our children, from first grade on, that it is a social construct, that difference between human beings - whether between white and black or between Serb and Kosovan - are largely perceived? ....
"Once this country's race leaders cease exploiting the gross and subtle inferior energy (matter) for their own financial and political purposes, the superior energy (the living entity) will have a better chance to remember its real spiritual mind and intelligence and transcend this senseless race-consciousness. Only by developing htis spiritual insight will we be able to co-exist on this planet and gradually work toward understanding our common source, God."
And folks, that is one hell of a Bhagavad-gita class.
My one critique of the book is that he doesn't connect this enough. He doesn't link this as much as he could to our philosophy. For example, at the end of the last paragraph, he could have ended "...whose identity is firmly ensconced in a racial essence, a racial consciousness, a bodily concept."
Doing that would not only link what he's saying directly to Srila Prabhupada's words, but would also give devotees a better understanding of what he's talking about. Not that we're too dim to get that racial consciousness is a bodily conception, but seeing it there on the page really drives it home.
In the final paragraph in the section above, he does, of course, connect the two, but, at least to me, it seems clunky. While he explains what inferior and superior energy is, he doesn't really let on how it relates to what he's talking about. In race-consciousness, the superior energy (the living entities) is manipulating superior energy (other living entities) by using inferior energy (bodily concept - in this case, race).
He then jumps right back into a Bhagavad-gita purport, writing "Continual study of the Bhavad-gita leads to the firm understanding and realization that Krishna alone is the ultimate limit of para-tattva (the science of understanding the highest truth), the Supreme Absolute Reality, and that there is no more exalted knowledge than knowing Him. Only by surrendering exclusively to His lotus feet can one become free from the bondage of maya."
While I certainly agree with that, it seems to almost come out of nowhere.
Now I didn't come here to rip apart this book. Not at all! I'm really excited about it. This is my new favorite thing ever! Sure, I have a few critiques, but overall, the whole of this book is amazing.
Take, for example, his critique of Jesse Jackson's "Keep Hope Alive!" campaign from Chapter 9 - The Most Confidential Knowledge.
"Inasmuch as "hoping" is the same thing as "postponing" - i.e., it is not "doing" for oneself - what is Jackson actually advocating that black folk do? Think about that, won't you?"
That quote alone speaks volumes. Hoping is postponing. When taken in light of something as heavy as revolutionary thought, that's some pretty scary stuff. Just who is Rev. Jackson working for?
However, my critique of his work comes back in Chapter 10 - Opulence of the Absolute. Charukrishna prabhu writes "America's success is by the grace of God, but our nation tends to neglect this truth. Moreover, we seem to ignore our virtues as a nation and prefer, instead, to break into small factions and warring groups."
This is true. But the conclusion which he's hinting at is, in my opinion, flawed and simply not spiritual. He is saying that instead of being a united America, we are splitting ourselves into groups according to (among other things) race. But isn't America, or any nation, inferior energy? Isn't patriotism a by-product of bodily consciousness? Essentially, we are not American or Russian or Chinese anymore than we are Black or White or Mulatto. These labels are illusions. And our so-called leaders use these labels, these illusions, to manipulate us. It is true of black leaders, it is true of national leaders.
He goes on to say, "Whenever one sees some extraordinary power, one should understand that it is derived from God's power. It logically follows, therefore, that America's predominance in the world is due to God's favor."
But this is faulty logic. A rapist, for example, rapes to have power over his victim. Is this power, this predominance over the victim due to God's favor? No. It's due to the rapist's freewill and misuse of God's energy. This is an extreme example, but I don't see how either could be from God's favor.
In the next paragraph, however, he and I are back on track.
"Recall the dismay expressed by many Africa-Americans when the Census Bureau reported in 2003 that Hispanics had surpassed blacks as the largest minority in America. Observe also the increasing warfare between black and Latino street gangs in many of our nation's largest cities - particularly Los Angeles.
"This is due to a depraved devotion to race-consciousness. In fact, it would not be far off to say that in our country - and throughout most of the modern world - race-consciousness has replaced God-consciousness."
All this is true. But all this could be extended to national-consciousness, patriotism, as well. His book isn't about that, so I wouldn't expect him to draw that connection. However, I didn't expect him to so awkwardly bring up that America's power is due to God's favor.
Again, I feel as if I'm criticizing too much. This is a very important book. I think it should definitely be read. Not only that, I feel that books like this should be written more often. We always talk about spiritual solutions to material problems, but we never see examples of them (aside from a few here and there that often seem pointless and very out of touch). But this book really is in touch with its audience. It's grounded enough in Bhagavad-gita philosophy to please nearly any devotee and its critique of the equal rights movement is, often, brilliant.
And maybe that is where my own problems lie. I have little to no interaction with the equal rights movement. While I've always felt a comradery with black culture (starting way back with Sesame Street and continuing through the 80's hiphop movement), I've not actually worked hand-in-hand with these folks.
Maybe my critique of his nationalism is premature. Maybe his audience is nationalistic and not yet ready to throw off the yoke of that particular social...
Read more ›
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
