| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
30 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An encouragement to my faith,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Is the Bible True? (Hardcover)
I really enjoyed this book. I was prepared for it to be full of sloppy thinking and predjudiced conclusions. I commend the author for his evenhanded evaluation of the Bible. I was especially encouraged by the section on archeology. This book should cause anyone to want to read the Bible directly regardless of thier religious views.
40 of 45 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Overall Good and Helpful,
This review is from: Is the Bible True? (Hardcover)
Sheler's book is generally good and helpful. He discusses many ways in which archaeology support the Bible record--both by direct evidence, and by proving that the Bible accurately reflects the time in which it was written. The book will definitely give you a new appreciation for the accuracy of the Bible!Sheler also does us a favor when he shows how misguided the hardened critics are (on one hand), and mystical kooks (on the other). For example, hardened critics believed there was no David, no Sargon, and no Nebuchadnezzar--until archaeologists found evidence of all three. On the other hand, mystical kooks continually dish up silliness like the Dead Sea Scrolls conspiracy theories: suggesting that the scrolls are being held secret because they would completely disprove the New Testament, etc.. Other kooky ideas include ``Bible Code'' theories and the modern gnostic ideas, which suggest that the ``real message'' of the Bible is in the form of a secret message. Sheler's book has its weaknesses, though. He tries to be a little too glib. He dismisses the Bible a little lightly at times, suggesting that ``only serious fundamentalists'' take this or that portion of the Bible seriously. It makes him shoot low: he is content to prove that the Bible is ``generally accurate'' while at the same time leaving the impression that the Bible has often botched the details. Overall, the book is good and helpful. It leaves an off taste, and some loose ends, for the reason I mention above. But if you can take it with a pinch of salt, you'll be glad you gave it a read.
29 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A very respectful look at "objective" evidence of the Bible.,
By A Customer
This review is from: Is the Bible True? (Hardcover)
This book takes the approach that the Bible can (and perhaps should) be considered in the same manner as any other ancient text. The author points out that this often is not what happens; rather that (often in the service of their own prejudices) scholars hold a double standard which demands more of Biblical text than other contemporaneous writings. The whole presentation of this book was refreshing in the respect that it paid to the three major monotheistic religions of the Middle East, and especially so the Christian tradition. Whereas many current writers seem intent on "debunking" religious belief, this book can, and does, strengthen one's faith. The archeological and historical support for Biblical scriptures is presented in a manner that can be understood easily, historiographical issues are raised and discussed, and when the evidence simply is not there (in either direction) the author says so. As a Christian, I appreciated Mr. Sheler's respect. As an educated man (doctorate and practicing psychologist) I appreciate the intelligence Mr. Sheler brought to the table. This was a very difficult task that was done well!
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|