John Goldingay is an Old Testament professor at Fuller Theological Seminary and a prolific author, writing popular books including Walk On, Men Behaving Badly, To the Usual Suspects, and After Eating the Apricot, and scholarly works such as the NIBC commentary on Isaiah, the 3-volume Baker commentary on the Psalms, and a 3-volume Old Testament Theology. He is currently writing "The Old Testament for Everyone" commentary series and has completed the volumes on Genesis; Exodus and Leviticus; Numbers and Deuteronomy; Joshua, Judges and Ruth; 1 & 2 Samuel; and 1 & 2 Kings.
BestCommentaries.com ranks Goldingay's WBC as the top Daniel commentary at 8.1 while the second-best is Baldwin's TOTC at a distant 6.8. Miller's NAC is third at 6.6 while the distinguished John Joseph Collins' Hermeneia received a 6.5.
After the table of contents and abbreviations is the introduction, which consists of a 16-page history of the interpretation of Daniel. There is no discussion of standard introductory subjects such as authorship, date, and canonicity. However, he does cover topics such as the book's origin, authors, and theological significance in a conclusion to the commentary.
In the commentary proper, Goldingay provides his own translation for each chapter of Daniel followed by notes on the Hebrew text. Next, following WBC's standard format, is the Form/Structure/Setting section. But instead of writing about form, structure, and setting in one combined section, he has his material divided under the subheadings "Form," "Structure," and "Setting." This is the first time I've seen this in any WBC volume.
Next is the Comment section. Goldingay's comments are organized verse-by-verse as is the standard WBC format. Finally, again following WBC's standard format, is the Explanation section. Here he went beyond the usual WBC format that combines all the author's explanations together under this heading--Goldingay has his explanations organized verse-by-verse in the same manner as in the Comment section. Again, this is the first time I've seen this in any WBC volume.
As an example of his elegant writing, in the explanation section on Daniel chapter 2, where the Babylonian sages did not know the interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream so he sent out an edict that these sages were to be killed, Goldingay says: "The sages of Babylon descend from a matter-of-fact confidence, via bluster and disbelief, to a bewildered helplessness that faces the guillotine. Out attention now moves from these cartoon portraits to a picture in total contrast, of Daniel who models wisdom and piety, shrewd and astute before Arioch, bold and confident before Nebuchadnezzar, open in fellowship with his friends, believing and urgent in prayer, lofty and profound in praise, decisive and assured when he returns with an explanation of the dream, straight and trenchant in declaring both its origins in God's revelation and its content regarding Babylon's future."
I am a big fan of the WBC series and have read several WBC volumes (Genesis by Wenham, Exodus by Dunham, 1 Chronicles by Braun, 2 Chronicles by Dillard, Jeremiah by Craigie et al., Lamentations by House, and Ezekiel by Allen). This volume by Goldingay is the best and most enjoyable WBC I've read. It is scholarly, profound, elegantly written, and replete with theological reflections and practical applications. He uses the WBC format exceedingly well and the commentary can be easily read cover-to-cover.
I'll end with a sentence by Goldingay that is typical of his practical applications: "People in exposed positions such as Daniel's prove God's wisdom before gentile masters; how much more can ordinary people in the context of their ordinary pressures."
This is a masterful commentary. Very highly recommended.