Most Helpful Customer Reviews
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A First-Rate Thriller!, June 15, 2004
This book is first-rate. Who cares if it was first published in 1946? It's just as fresh now as it was then. For such a little book it has everything - irony, satire, unique plot, and suspense. The book has a sense of urgency as you read it because each of the chapters is written in the first person, but the chapters are not the first-person of the same character. A number of different characters are highlighted in this way, and this gives a curious sense of really getting to know the characters quickly. The book has a journalistic slant, and the main character, George Stroud, is placed in the position of trying to find himself as he is a key player in what turned out to be a murder of the woman that he had just spent the weekend with. George knows who the killer actually is, and he also knows that if this killer finds out who he George is, he will be silenced as the killer will want to shift blame to him. George is racing against the clock to keep his own identity secret and to save his life. - A very good noir novel.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Clever plot, May 27, 2006
This is a suspense thriller rather than a mystery or whodunnit. It's structured like Wilkie Collins' 19th century "The Moonstone" with chapters presented in the 1st person by various people. Similarly, it has the interesting feature of having different characters' views of the same individual. While the details are a bit dated (the low prices of things are amazing), the plot is not, & the author succeeds admirably in making it a real page-turner. I stayed up to the wee hours to finish it. It's a bit hard-boiled in languaging & has the clock metaphor which didn't really do much for me. Also, he mentions "her Adam's Apple" -- not anatomically correct. IMHO though the art aspect is great, especially Louise Patterson. Her chapter is brilliant! Overall this book is a fun, fast-paced, read. Enjoy!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Murder, modernism, and mass culture, July 24, 2006
The basis for the Ray Milland film of the same name, and its 80s remake with Kevin Costner NO WAY OUT, Kenneth Fearing's THE BIG CLOCK is one of the most famous and most ingenious noir thrillers of the 30s and 40s. A magazine publisher much like Henry Luce has murdered his mistress in a rage; his top aide convinces him to pin it on the last man to see the woman alive (whose face and name the publisher does not know). They enlist the help of the editor of the publishing house's crime magazine to lead the manhunt--a man who happens to be the very one for whom they're searching. The existential implications of engaging in a manhunt for yourself do not seem to escape Fearing, but his feat with this work is to expand even beyond that. The publication house which forms the novel's central locale brings out magazines that cover almost every aspect of modern mass culture, from news to business to Hollywood to true crime. And, stepping even beyond that, because the novel's key figure also collects the art of an obscure painter (which becomes crucial to the central mystery), THE BIG CLOCK also interrogates the ways in which high art is itself dependent upon mass culture. Sometimes Fearing's book is too ambitious for its own good (the multiple narrator trick is not handled as deftly as you'd like), but on the whole its not only a tight little thriller but it also manages to engage intelligently with some of the most important social and cultural premises of its day. This is a book that greatly deserved to be rediscovered by NYRB.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|