Most Helpful Customer Reviews
21 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Engaging but flawed, October 6, 2003
This review is from: Bill Clinton: An American Journey: Great Expectations (Hardcover)
Engaging but flawed--something one could say with equal confidence about this book and about its subject. Bill Clinton is a fascinating, appealing, brilliant, larger-than-life character with tremendous gifts and profound weaknesses. Nigel Hamilton's new biography--the first of two parts (like his earlier, much-acclaimed JFK: Reckless Youth, the sequel to which has yet to appear)--is full of fascinating information and suggestive analysis, but, like Bill Clinton, it is imperfect. To begin with the obvious: this is a thoughtfully written, carefully researched examination of Bill Clinton's first forty-six years (it ends with the 1992 election). It helps the reader understand not only Clinton but also his times: Hamilton's subtitle, An American Journey, points to the book's focus. It depicts Clinton as a representative American of his generation, a man whose individual career mirrors the collective career of the Baby Boomers he so ably represented--in the minds of enthusiasts and detractors alike. As an Englishman, Hamilton brings an outsider's perspective to bear on American culture, politics, and history. He helps us get to know Bill Clinton and the many fascinating people who have surrounded him, from Arkansas senator William Fulbright (pictured in a memorably testy moment on the campaign trail) to Hillary Rodham (equally testy) to Gennifer Flowers. Hamilton enriches our understanding of issues and personalities alike. It's a must-read for anyone interested in Bill Clinton, in American politics, or in the Baby Boom generation and the cultural transformation American has undergone during its ascendancy. The book is flawed, though, in at least three ways. First, Hamilton's usually invaluable outsider perspective sometimes gets him in trouble, as when he confuses liberal stalwart Eugene McCarthy with anti-communist witch-hunger Joe McCarthy (126) or characterizes "Whittier [home of Richard Nixon] and the Pedernales [stomping ground of Lyndon Johnson]" as among Clinton's (and Cliff Jackson's) "law school texts" (254). Second, the book may have been written too early. By Hamilton's own admission, he has had to rely to a significant extent on published sources. Others might prove more available in a few years (and will, we can only hope, help to inform the second volume of this two-volume biography). Third, Hamilton seems to be on a mission to justify Clinton's sexual behavior as an outcome of an irresistible evolutionary logic. He returns repeatedly to flaccid sociobiological explanations of the sexual choices of Clinton and men like him (e.g., "Feminists in particular deplored and rejected patriarchal libertinism, however much it might still be part of man's ancient, evolutionary makeup. Nonfeminist women, emboldened by changing attitudes toward equality between the sexes, also failed to take account of men's genetically determined promiscuity" [322-3]). Those readers skeptical of sociobiology will find this refrain tiring--a distraction from a generally first-rate book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Surprisingly shoddy work for a legitimate biographer, November 6, 2003
This review is from: Bill Clinton: An American Journey: Great Expectations (Hardcover)
Clinton has always fascinated me, the same way Reagan has. How can one person who is deified by so many also be despised by so many? And how can a man like Clinton, who is universally acknowledged as brilliant, make so many horrendously stupid mistakes? Given the overwhelming number of outrageously biased biographies out there, I hoped Hamilton would provide a more objective and honest look at Bill Clinton. Unfortunately, Hamilton has read all the other biographies and was unable to determine which ones were legitimate and which ones were unsophisicated, invalid screeds. As a result, he frequently documents as facts statements that are either certainly untrue or, at best, deserve more support than he provides. Not that any of his outrageous claims are new--not only did he inhale, he was heavily into cocaine; he had people murdered for political objectives--but none of the supposed research backing these more damning claims are documented in the endnotes. He also includes some of Gennifer Flower's more peculiar claims--such as their fantasy games, or the fact that she put makeup on him--and accepts them as true without considering whether she possibly had an ulterior motive for making these claims (e.g., to sell more books?). Before conservatives start thinking Hamilton is their man, they should be aware that Hamilton is greatly intrigued by the evolutionary theory of sex, which he thinks explains Clinton's propensity for adultery. Hamilton's repeated explanations of this theory, which he clearly supports, are unnecessary and explain nothing (even if you accept that men are biologically/evolutionally wired to cheat, why did Clinton do so at such an incredible rate, and why do many/most men contain themselves?). In fact, Hamilton humiliates and discredits himself by including some of the most ridiculous references available to support his theories, including numerous titles that seem like bizarre sex manuals. Hamilton's attempts to place Clinton in context are sporadic and uneven--for example, he goes into great detail describing the church sex scandals of the late 80s and early 90s, though they have little to do with understanding Clinton. He occasionally sets the tone of the times, but these attempts are rare and often half-hearted. Hamilton has done little apparent additional work to understand the man he attempts to describe. There are few interviews noted and most interviews are quoted extensively, resulting in the impression that he wanted to make the most of the little actual leg-work he did. In short, Hamilton has developed a portrait of Clinton based almost solely on other people's research, and he has made no effort in determining whether the other works were legitimate, valid, or useful. He adds nothing to understanding Clinton as a politician, a husband, a father, or a man that is not readily available elsewhere. An understanding of Clinton and all his contradictions, as far as I can tell, has not been developed.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Bill Clinton--The National Enquirer Version, March 4, 2004
By A Customer
This review is from: Bill Clinton: An American Journey: Great Expectations (Hardcover)
Love him or hate him, Bill Clinton is a fascinating character. (Full disclosure: I grew up 4 years after and 35 miles south of Clinton in Arkansas. I've never met him, but I know lots of people who have. I was in school at the University of Arkansas when he was a law professor there, and I remember seeing him around town when he ran for Congress in 1974.) How could someone with such outstanding political and personal talents, someone so obviously intelligent-how could a person like that be so stupid? What is it about his background as the child of a single mom, and then of an alcoholic and abusive stepfather, that explains his personal behavior? Inasmuch as we are ever going to get an answer to that question, we are probably not going to get it from Clinton himself. The ability to see himself honestly is not one of his many talents, so we will have to rely on testimony from others, and on the biographers who collect that testimony for us. The relevant question then becomes: how reliable is the biographer in filtering the material for us, at making sense of what can often be contradictory evidence? In the case of Nigel Hamilton, I can't say that I completely trust his judgment. He must have read every tell-all tale ever written by anyone who ever spoke to Clinton, and accepts every tale as equally credible. There is no doubt that Clinton's personal life is a mess, but some of the allegations made against him are questionable, at least. In Hamilton's book, you would think that rape and murder allegations are as well-attested as the infamous blue dress. And then there is his pop-psychologist take on American culture from the `60s to the `90s. Over and over, we are given his version of evolutionary psychology (basically women want one sexual partner while men are driven to spread their seed around-It's not my fault! Evolution made me do it!), and the word "postmodern" is used to describe everything from Jimmy Swaggart to Lorena Bobbitt. Yes, every sleazy press story of the last two decades is in here, with Mr. Hamilton explaining to us what it all means and how it all relates to Bill and Hill. So is this book worthless? No, not at all. He has interviewed dozens of friends and foes of the Clintons, and quotes extensively from those interviews. And they are fascinating. These interviews are what make the book worth reading. It is as though you got to ask a whole range of people who knew him at all different stages of his life, "What was (or is) he really like?" and then got an earful! Still, THE book to read is still First In His Class, by Dave Maraniss. Read that first. Then, if you're still curious, read this book. Just keep in mind that you may periodically feel the need to take a shower.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|