2 Reviews
|
5 star:
|
|
(1) |
|
4 star:
|
|
(0) |
|
3 star:
|
|
(0) |
|
2 star:
|
|
(1) |
|
1 star:
|
|
(0) |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review
22 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Biology: A Self-Teaching Guide
Clear, succinct, explains everything really well. I wish all my texts were this easy to understand.
Published on December 19, 2002
|
 |
59 of 81 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not a good survey of the material
Do not be misled by the generally high quality of Mr. Garber's previous work. The "self-teaching" guide is more vocabulary list than textbook. Critical missing features include (a) some notion of life as _process_ rather than a lengthy list of elements of cell anatomy, (b) poikilothermy appears in end-of-chapter questions, but the text does not compare it with...
Published on April 3, 2000
|
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
22 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Biology: A Self-Teaching Guide, December 19, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: Biology: A Self-Teaching Guide (Paperback)
Clear, succinct, explains everything really well. I wish all my texts were this easy to understand.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
59 of 81 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not a good survey of the material, April 3, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: Biology: A Self-Teaching Guide (Paperback)
Do not be misled by the generally high quality of Mr. Garber's previous work. The "self-teaching" guide is more vocabulary list than textbook. Critical missing features include (a) some notion of life as _process_ rather than a lengthy list of elements of cell anatomy, (b) poikilothermy appears in end-of-chapter questions, but the text does not compare it with homeothermy in any useful way, (c) comparative anatomy illustrations are not drawn to scale, making it difficult to make appropriate comparisons. The vocabulary lists and end-of-chapter multiple choice questions would save a first-year teaching assistant some time preparing for classes for non-majors. The book is not much help in acquiring a general understanding of the basic science.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
|