Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
37 of 47 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
The author should take a course in basic math, November 5, 2006
I bought this book looking forward to reading evidence that oil came from a geophysical process rather than biological. I still hope that is true, but this author has almost completely convinced me against it.
I've never read a book with so many mathematical errors. I'll give a few examples of the many that exist. There's a section from page 72-78. Throughout this section, the author uses million, billion and trillion interchangeably as if they were the same number. On page 83 he states that carbon dioxide makes up one tenth of one percent of the atmosphere. On page 85 he states that it makes up a full one percent. He then procedes to do some calculations that are off by a factor of 10. On page 103 he mentions how much carbon various countries are putting into the atmosphere. He says nothing as to time. Do they put this much out every day, year decade...who knows!
The author's main argument against his opposition is 'They're stupid because they don't believe what I believe.' He seems to think if he calls them stupid enough times in enough ways we'll start to realize what a genius he is. One example of this: He says that big oil fields are being found in the ocean below two miles of water. He ridicules the bio-oil people mentioning what idiots they must be to believe that this area must once have been above water for dinosaurs to die on it and become oil. I wonder, did it ever cross his mind that bio-material is continuously falling to the bottom of the ocean by the billions of tons. The material would thicken, come under pressure (even more than the water provides) and over millions of years plate tectonics would move it deep into the mantle.
He unashamedly says we should use all the oil we want. There's an unlimited supply and man is stupid if he thinks he's powerful enough to cause global warming. In one chapter he goes into depth explaining how great it is that we import a large part of our oil. It brings mutual international investment and interdependence. In this chapter he says the U.S. uses 20 million barrels a day getting 1.5M from Canada, 1.5M from Mexico and 1.5M from Saudi Arabia. The rest from other sources. In the next chapter he rails against importing oil. In his words, "We have never before in our history experienced this massive a transfer of our national wealth overseas." etc... In this chapter we use 21M barrels a day. We get 1.72M from Canada, 1.75M from Mexico and 1.4M from the Saudis.
In summary, this is one of the worst books I have ever read. He doesn't have a clue what he's talking about and isn't even consistent in his own words. Don't waste your money buying this book. I wish I had read the other reviews before I did.
|
|
|
26 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Breaking the Black Gold Stranglehold Means Confronting Myths, January 16, 2008
~Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil~ is a brave challenge to the prevalence of politically-motivated pseudo-science and the crude politics of oil. Jerome R. Corsi and Craig R. Smith expose the fraudulent geologic science behind the myth of oil scarcity: which is a myth that the geologists on the payrolls of oil cartels have no intention of challenging. In the sensational movie dramatization about the politics of oil Syriana, the hard-hitting narrative on the movie trailer proclaimed, "It's running out. And 90% of what's left is in the Middle East. It's going to be a fight to the death." None of that was really true, but many think it to be so. The fossil fuel myth is one of the most egregious scientific myths of our time.
The biogenic hypothesis for the origins of petroleum was first proposed in 1757 by Russian scholar Mikhail Lomonosov (1711-1765). The Russian chemist Dmitri Mendeleev (1834-1937) and the French chemist Marcellin Berthelot (1827-1907) later gave credence to the theory, through their research. The Abiogenic theory saw a revival by Russian and Ukrainian scientists in the past century, and following the release in 1999 of The Deep Hot Biosphere by Thomas Gold, its credibility increased among American scientists. Gold's theory is based on the existence of a biosphere composed of thermophile bacteria in the earth's crust, which explains the existence of biomarkers in petroleum. The presence of microscopic biological matter in oil compelled scientists such as Lomonosov to conclude that oil had biological origins. But as scientist Fred Hoyle said in approbation of Gold's thesis: "The suggestion that petroleum might have arisen from soem transformation of squashed fish or biological detritus is surely the silliest notion to have been entertained by substantial numbers of persons over an extended period of time." In 2002, a large section of the Larsen B Ice Shelf broke free of the Antarctic Peninsula. When scientific submersibles probed the icey bottom of of the seafloor measuring twice the size of Texas, they made a startling discovery. The through below the ice shelf had been undisturbed for ages, and it was breeding with life: it was a colony of clams and layers of bacterial mats. The life thrived on methane and was incapable of photosynthesis, as no light was accessible to it. Similarly, microscopic organisms that live in petroleum below the earth's surface live off of the petroleum itself. The discovery in Antarctica confirmed Thomas Gold's hypothesis that a "deep, hot biosphere" would be found where organisms thrived by drawing energy directly from hydrocarbon sources pouring out of the earth's mantle. In reality petroleum is "abiogenic and ubiquitous deep in the earth." Consisting mostly of hydrocarbons, it is produced deep within the earth's core, which subjects it to immense heat and pressure. The centrifugal forces of the earth's rotation act to propel petroleum to the substratum of the earth's crust, thereby making it accessible to man for petroleum exploration. Oil fields can be emptied, but many have an uncanny tendency to replenish themselves.
Among the myths busted in this fascinating book are the Hubbert peak theory, which perpetuates a myth of extreme oil scarcity, when it reality it is a renewable resource. In reality, today, we have more oil reserves than ever before, and more oil continues to be found. The United States which is dependent largely upon foreign oil has enough oil offshore and in Alaska to supply itself for decades to come. After the publication of this book in 2006, Chevron reports having found an oil field under the Gulf of Mexico that could boost US reserves by more than 50%. However, stringent environmental regulations and the threat of constant environmental litigation has impeded oil exploration, and restricted the efficiency of exploration and refining in the United States.
You don't seriously believe that all the trillions of tons of oil reserves below the earth's crust are merely the compound of primordial ooze from dead dinosaurs and plant matter do you? Neither do I.
The money Americans spend on imported oil and gas indirectly contributes to the support of radical Islamism, and its dependency that America must break. Instead, we should turn to increasing domestic and continental production in North America, by easing red tape, restraints, and breaking the shackles of the regulatory state which impedes exploration and refining within the United States.
Global warming too, is a scientific hoax. Meteorology as as science is still largely in its infancy, as tools for analyzing climate changes have only recently been developed in the past century. There is credible evidence which suggests the earth is just as likely to cool as it is to warm; moreover, there is also evidence for 100-year cycles, and mild temperature fluctuations from time-to-time.
Americans need a common-sense market-oriented solution to its oil problem, and the increasing prices of oil on the international market. Interventionist foreign policy is demanded by oil cartels to further their interests, and its not necessarily in our best interests to pursue. Dependency upon the Middle East and Venezuela is not in our vital national security interests, and acts to prop up regimes hostile to the United States. Even Iran is a beneficiary of U.S. funds in spite of the supposed embargo, because its oil is merely exported through intermediary states to the U.S. and our government knows where it comes from. We must toss aside the myths of global warming and oil scarcity, and loosen regulatory handicaps which bar the U.S. from taking advantage of its abundant natural resources. Alternative energy sources have proven themselves wasteful. Windmills don't suffice, and kill endangered raptors. Government-subsidized synthetic ethanol fuel is a joke, as it's not economically viable and requires more BTUs to produce than results from the actual output of production. Investment in technology, such as improved refining techniques and better-quality engines, which burn fuel in a cleaner manner, are wiser alternatives than abandoning the use of oil. Getting away from the oil economy is a pipe dream. Only the advent of the long-hypothesized, revolutionary cold fusion technology could began to render oil production superfluous.
All things considered, Jerome Corsi and Craig Smith have put together a compelling and provocative thesis. American policymakers need to take it into serious consideration, and start unraveling the intrigue of crude politics.
|
|
|
45 of 64 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Disappointing, November 2, 2005
After reading the claims that this book would turn the world on it's ear, I was expecting a whole bunch more. There's been more than 50 years of scientific research into fossil fuels, I find it difficult to believe that all of a sudden everything we know about oil is wrong. A few quoted technicians versus 1000's of teams of geologists and research specialists doesn't seem like a fair match.
This book didn't prove it to me, oil is fairly obviously becoming harder and harder to drill for, and more expensive to bring up. The Canadian Shale takes almost as much energy in natural gas to produce the oil as it's worth, and they can only generate a million barrels a day. Hardly enough to make a difference in a world that uses 89 million barrels of oil per day.
For another book in this category I highly recommend Michael Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon". THAT book makes sense, and scares me as a see the effects of our diminishing cheap oil supply.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|