35 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Controversial, possibly, but a wonderful and important book!, November 14, 1998
This review is from: Blaming the Brain : The Truth About Drugs and Mental Health (Hardcover)
Valenstein does it again! After his insightful book on the history of psychosurgery, the author, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Michigan University, examines the biochemical theories of mental disorders. In a well-written book, Valenstein (a) describes the history of the major "theories" relating mental disease to brain function, and the history of the main psychotherapeutic drugs; (b) the empirical and logical basis of the claims that mental disorders are caused by chemical inbalances in the brain; and (c) the social, economic, and cultural contexts surrounding the use of psychothrapeutic drugs. Although not a physician, psychiatrist, or clinical psychologist, I admire the book for its extensive review of the scientific literature, for its success at explaining the main ideas about mental disease and brain science to the nonspecialist, and for its thoughtful conclusions. Perhaps the book's greatest virtue is to remind us of how ignorant we still are about the causes of schizophrenia, manic-depressive disorder, and many other mental conditions. In a word, read this excellent book. The writing is also elegant.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
41 of 47 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Silver Bullets and Free Lunches, January 3, 2007
This review is from: Blaming the Brain : The Truth About Drugs and Mental Health (Hardcover)
Once or twice a month, in many psychiatric hospitals, researchers present data showing the therapeutic efficacy of a new drug (or tweaked older one with a new label). The charts and graphs about these "silver bullets" usually feature percentages of psychiatric patient improvements over six to eight weeks in comparison with those treated by placebo or competing meds. The sample sizes are typically small and, at least in the many of these presentations that I attended, even the simplest descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, etc), to say nothing of measures of sample overlap (Cohen's d scores) and meta-analyses, are nowhere to be seen. Nor are they readily available from the presenter. The attending psychiatric staff sometimes raise questions about the area of the brain or nerve receptor the drug targets while they enjoy the fine and plentiful free lunch provided by the sponsoring pharmaceutical company. It would be difficult to conclude other than that issues of empirical validity had been comfortably settled long ago. Thus, these concerns were far beyond the mattering maps of the audience. An earlier generation's favored cure was lobotomy before, in the early 1950s, the discovery of Thorazine's (chlorpromazine) quieting effects ushered in this, now dominant, psychiatric treatment paradigm.
Elliot Valenstein's BLAMING THE BRAIN: THE TRUTH ABOUT DRUGS AND MENTAL HEALTH demonstrates why rationales for this paradigm ain't necessarily so. Valenstein, professor emeritus of psychology and neuroscience, University of Michigan, continues the program begun in his GREAT AND DESPERATE CURES: THE RISE AND DECLINE OF PSYCHOSURGERY AND OTHER RADICAL TREATMENTS FOR MENTAL ILLNESS (HarperCollins, 1987) and now followed by his most recent THE WAR OF THE SOUPS AND THE SPARKS: THE DISCOVERY OF NEUROTRANSMITTERS AND THE DISPUTE OVER HOW NERVES COMMUNICATE (Columbia Univ. Press, 2005). He helps his readers look beyond the shiny surfaces of therapeutic regimes and into the empirical heart of these matters. In BLAMING Valenstein draws our attention to the transition in psychiatric treatment ideology from mothers as causes of mental illnesses to the current conventional certainties about chemical imbalances in the brain, which he says, though in other words, rest solidly on a foundation of sand. He describes how neuropsychiatric theory got from there to here, then to now, jettisoning untidy, equivocal empirical data along the way.
In BLAMING, a rich historical context is provided to make sense of the scientific, social and economic forces that led to the now, largely unchallenged, happy and enduring marriage between the pharmaceutical industry and the psychotropic treatments that identify most of present-day psychiatry. [See Peter Breggin's TOXIC PSYCHIATRY, St. Martin's Press, 1991 and C. Ross & A. Pam's (Eds.) PSEUDOSCIENCE IN BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, Wiley, 1995 for notable exceptions in the psychiatric community]. Included on the theoretical side are the speculations of the 19th century figures like Thidicum, the founder of modern neurochemistry and Freud, both of whom suggested a neurochemical basis for mental illnesses, and the chemical elaboration of LSD accompanied by the English professor of pharmacology, John Gaddum's suggestion that LSD-25's effects might be caused by blocking the neurotransmitter serotonin, a newly discovered brain chemical he thought essential for balanced mental activity.
On the treatment side, Valenstein traces the emerging trials in the early 50s with Thorazine, initially marketed as a surgery anesthetic. This led to it and later generations of drugs becoming the treatments of choice for the schizophrenias. Similar development pathways are described for the anti-depressants and anti-anxiety meds. An anecdote not included, but that gives some idea of the patient's experience with these "tranquilizers," is the story of Dr. Cornelia Quarti, the psychiatric resident who submitted experimentally to a trial with Thorazine in the earliest days of its use. As the drug took effect she tried to shout out, "No! You are bothering me!" and tried to fight off the subsequent feeling of imminent death with all her energy. Later, she listened in amazement as the experiment tape recording revealed, a "weak and monotonous voice..." [cf. D. Cohen in S. Fisher & R.P. Greenberg (Eds.), FROM PLACEBO TO PANACEA, Wiley, 1997].
Professor Valenstein's treatment of the empirical and theoretical developments in neuroscience and psychopharmacology is detailed and exhaustive including issues surrounding electrical versus chemical stimulation of the brain (the Sparks and the Soups camps), relationships between the discoveries of neurotransmitters, brain centers for reward, eating, rage and physiological concomitants of emotion (sweating, changes in heart rate and blood pressure, etc.), and biochemical theories about how these might explain the effects of psychotropic medications and account for mental illnesses. Not the least of these accounts were theories of schizophrenia (excess dopamine) and depression (e.g. serotonin deficiency) that are still favored in the trenches of clinical psychiatry. For reasons that are carefully explored in Chapter 4 (A Closer Look at the Evidence) and Chapter 5 (The Interpretation of the Evidence), these and other biological theories are critiqued on grounds that are logical (cause/effect confusion, reductionism), empirical (brain plasticity in response to experience; complex, often indeterminate, disease pathways) and moral (political/economic forces through which marketing, corporation earnings and bare bones state hospital budgets coalesce in spite of the known limits and iatrogenic effects of sustained treatment with psychotropic meds and proven psychosocial community treatment). See Chapter 6 on the pharmaceutical industry influences and Chapter 7 on special interest groups.
BLAMING provides a thicket of facts woven together clearly, crisply and expertly. Following the evidence, Valenstein comes down hard on current treatment with psychotropics, biological psychiatry and the partnership between Big Pharma and medicine. He makes clear, there is an important place for medication. However, the complex interplay between biological and psychosocial phenomena means that the silver bullet, the wonder drug that can solve the lock and key problem of mental illness, or psychotropic cocktails, are unlikely fixes for problems of living. And, no lunch is free as medical staff surely ought to know.
If the reader wants more from similar terrain there is David Healy's THE ANTIDEPRESSANT ERA (Harvard Univ. Press, 1997), Healy's THE PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGISTS (Chapman & Hall, 1998), Larry Squires THE HISTORY OF NEUROSCIENCE IN AUTOBIOGRAPHY (Society for Neuroscience, 1996), Edward Shorter's A HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRY (John Wiley, 1997), Marcia Angell's THE TRUTH ABOUT DRUG COMPANIES (Random House, 2004), the classic Gordon Paul & Robert Lentz's PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT OF MENTAL PATIENTS (Harvard Univ. Press, 1977) and A. R. Cellura's THE GENOMIC ENVIRONMENT AND NICHE-EXPERIENCE (Cedar Springs Press, 2006).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No