Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
20 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Trusting the Right Power Instead of the Power of the Right, July 19, 2000
What a GREAT book! I wish every evangelical Christian would read this book. If only Amazon had a 10 star rating! Though people constantly tried to get him to do otherwise, Jesus never allow himself to be co-opted into the politics of this world. He rather testified to the truth that he was about an entirely different kingdom by letting himself be killed by the politics of this world! Never once did he enter into the politically charged atmosphere of his day by even commenting on the relative merits or vices of the Roman leaders. His mission was about something unrelated to what these leaders did or did not do. Along similar lines, Paul reminds Christians to be followers of their heavenly Lord and not "to be occupied with civilian affairs" (2 Tim 2:4). And the author of Hebrews reminds Christians they are "aliens" in this world because they are "citizens of heaven." When we follow the example of Jesus and live THIS calling out, we have a power to change lives and affect the world that is not of this world. We win the world back for God, one soul at a time. Many, if not most, contemporary evangelicals have completely missed this. They sincerely believe that the battle is to be fought and won in the arena of earthly politics. Here is where Thomas and Dobson make their contribution. They "hit it out of the park"! These authorsl point out that evangelicals have come to do what Jesus never did, and what the Bible forbids us to do. We have waged war with "flesh and blood," forgetting that our real battle is "against principalities and powers" (Eph 6). We have spent our time and energy futily trying to tweak the world's hopelessly corrupt system -- and feeling very proud with little (temporary) gains -- instead of living our call to be ambassadors of an entirely different, counter-cultural, kingdom. In the process, we have damaged our reputation to the unbelieving world and diluted our kingdom authority. We have been corrupted by the desire for political might. With the wisdom of experience and the skill of seasoned writers, Thomas and Dobson expose this for the deception that it is. In so doing, they remind us that "though we are IN the world, we are not OF the world." "We do not wage war as the world does." Our weapons are person-to-person love, prayer, fasting, self-sacrifice and faith.
|
|
|
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Sincere effort marred by unfair criticism, April 22, 1999
The authors present a sincere critique of Christian political involvement in organizations such as the Moral Majority and Christian Coalition. Much of what they have to say is worthwhile and not controversial, even among those they criticize. However, over and over they repeat their central message that moral revival in America cannot come through politics and government. The problem is that in attempting to apply this critique to real individuals and organizations they are essentially knocking down a straw man of their own invention. Almost no one in those organizations holds the view that politics or government rather than the church is the principle instrument of revival. In this they adopt some of the same stereotypes that the left has constructed for the so-called religious right. The authors must know that any organization of Christians which has the temerity to appear in the "public square," even when they disavow politics, such as Promise Keepers, comes in for the same sort of criticism.Particularly unfair is their criticism of James Dobson of Focus on the Family. Ironically, after criticizing Billy Graham in the chapter "Seduced by Power" for absolving Clinton they criticize Dobson in a subsequent chapter for failing to see the necessity of political compromise when he called Republican politicians to task for betraying the principles they ran on. (This was in his widely-reported speech before the Council for National Policy, an outstanding speech.) The book concludes with interviews with politicians and other leaders. These interviews are notable for the degree to which, despite prodding from the interviewer, they refute the central tenets of the book. Most applaud the involvement of organizations such as Christian Coalition while recognizing the limits to what can be achieved by such means alone. In summary, this is a well-meant, sincere effort which falls short of providing guidance to those who still see the need for Christians united, not just as individuals, to exert influence in the "public square." It is deeply flawed by ascribing views and motivations to people such as James Dobson which they do not hold.
|
|
|
22 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A true reflection of the sate of political nature!, December 8, 2000
Blinded By Might gives a poignant insight into the world of Church/State politics and what is presented is not the most uplifting view. Quite unintentionally, the authors provide a Nietzschean framework in which (every) man's desire for power (i.e., the will to power) is all-consuming and forces political actors to behave in ways that can only be viewed as self-serving.During the 1960's and 1970's `fundamentalist' Christians were feeling continually disenfranchised as our country continued its downward spiral. This malaise was evidenced by waved after wave of Supreme Court rulings that legalized abortion, removed prayer from schools, and began to remove all-things-religious from civic life-the Supreme Court and the federal bureaucracy was becoming the de jure enforcement arm for the concept of the separation of Church and State. Into this moral breech several people began to tread, including Cal Thomas, Jerry Falwell, James Kennedy, etc. In 1980 the Moral Majority began to assert its political authority, helping to usher in the Reagan presidency through its successful grassroots motivation. What Thomas and Dobson seek to portray is an inside glimpse into the political as well as ideological shortcomings inherent in the involvement of Christians in the political realm. Trouble did not arise, when the religious right began to wane in political power...it is when the Moral Majority was at the height of its power that problems become obvious; the primary problem being a lack of results in policy formation. How did this problem occur? The Moral Majority and Christians became married to the Republican Party. Marriage forces people to overlook flaws in their partner and Jerry Falwell and his group did just that. A major problem for Christians is the false assertion that politics is all about ideals. Unfortunately, once you are thrown into the lion's den, often you are forced to behave pragmatically in order to survive. "The subordination of conviction to the pragmatic was also evident in politics-which is one of the dangers of too close an association by the church in affairs of state." All-too-often the leaders of the religious right end up "casting their pearls before swine." The religious right movement thought it could change hearts and morality from a top down approach, when in fact it is only at the one-to-one level that people change. As it relates to previous works, Blinded By Might is not theoretically far removed from the Wallis or Colson pieces. Ideologically all three books vary greatly in their approaches and prescriptions, but all seek to analyze the nature of Christians in the political realm. Faith Works, admonishes Christians for not doing enough, and Kingdoms In Conflict shows the power of Christians operating within and outside of the political sphere, whereas Blinded By Might serves as a warning about the perils of blurring the church/state line. Furthermore, anyone who desires to serve in positions of church leadership should be especially reticent to enter politics because the joys are fleeting and the will-to- power is intense.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|