| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This seminal report, which was soon followed by other reports of cases associated with transfusions of blood or blood products, produced profound changes in perceptions of AIDS and of the safety of blood. Scientists as well as the public became convinced of the transmissibility of an "AIDS agent," and focused efforts soon resulted in the discovery of the causative virus (later named the human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV). But the public perception of the safety of blood was altered, and AIDS changed forever the rules for those operating and regulating blood systems.
This history and its lessons are thoroughly reviewed in Blood Feuds: AIDS, Blood, and the Politics of Medical Disaster. This fascinating book is uniformly well written and easy to read, especially for an edited book with several authors. It contains 11 chapters in addition to an introduction and conclusion. Part I comprises eight chapters, each of which gives a summary analysis of the national responses to the crisis caused by the presence of HIV in the blood supply in a particular country -- the United States, Japan, France, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, and Australia. As the authors state, "Because the unfolding of conflicts over contaminated blood occurred almost simultaneously in different nations, blood became the vantage point from which to analyze the way in which countries with distinctive historical legacies managed a common crisis." The chapters on the individual countries have been written by thoughtful and knowledgeable experts and deal less with technical issues than with public concern and the response of the government and the private sector in each country.
The descriptions of the differences as well as the similarities in national responses to a nearly identical crisis make fascinating reading. The authors evaluate the part played by such factors as the extent to which the government is responsible for directly providing blood and blood products, the dependency of the country on imported blood or plasma, the visibility of the HIV epidemic in the country, and various cultural differences. Particularly intriguing are the comparisons of how different countries encountered liability and approached the issue of compensating patients with hemophilia. Unlike other battles in the AIDS epidemic, which ebbed in the late 1980s, Bayer and Feldman note, "the controversy surrounding blood persisted. Indeed, the intensity of the controversy over blood and AIDS underwent a process of amplification in the early 1990s," after the beginnings of activism among patients with hemophilia and their families. In many industrialized nations, patients with hemophilia had been liberated by the liberal use of factor VIII concentrates in the 1970s. The increase in life expectancy and the decrease in morbidity that resulted from treatment with products pooled from the plasma of thousands of donors (who were usually paid) was inadvertently accompanied by a tragic risk of a new disease, AIDS.
In a poignant chapter on the activism of patients with hemophilia and their families, Kirp details how "the victims ultimately regarded what happened as no accident but rather as the inevitable result of decisions driven by corporate greed." Following the example of ACT UP (the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power) years earlier, patients with hemophilia organized, demonstrated, and lobbied, seeking compensation through the courts and legislative processes. The "blood scandals" and their personal and institutional ramifications are richly described in the book. In the concluding chapter, Marmor and colleagues analyze the comparative politics and note that the intensity of the scandal in a given country was not a good measure of the wrongdoing in that nation. Of course, although concern about the safety of blood was indelibly changed by the experience with AIDS, more recent questions involve hepatitis C and even bovine spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease). By providing a cogent and thorough description of the AIDS saga, Blood Feuds provides insight into coping with these current and future threats to public health. This excellent book is well worth reading.
Reviewed by James W. Curran, M.D., M.P.H.
Copyright © 1999 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. The New England Journal of Medicine is a registered trademark of the MMS.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A fascinating comparative analysis of a tragic set of events,
By
This review is from: Blood Feuds: AIDS, Blood, and the Politics of Medical Disaster (Paperback)
This trenchant edited volume dissects a series of critical events that, while prominent in the public realm, have yet to receive adequate attention from students of social and political affairs -- the explosive scandals that rocked many nations after public health officials became aware of HIV contamination of domestic and international blood supplies. These events represent not only a fascinating and tragic historical episode in their own right, but also provide a revealing window into the response of national leaders to symbolically and politically potent crises under conditions of uncertainty, anxiety, and fear. The essays in this volume, all written by country experts and notable social scientists, examine the comparative response to the tainted blood crisis in eight advanced industrial democracies: Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United States. The questions asked in the case studies, in the fine opening chapter by Bayer and Feldman, and in the excellent concluding chapter by Marmor, Dillon, and Scher include: * Should national leaders have responded more quickly to the evidence that hemophiliacs and other blood transfusion recipients were becoming infected with HIV? * What accounts for the differences and similarities among nations in the speed and character of the eventual response? * Why did the tainted blood crisis become high political scandal in some nations -- such as France -- and not others, especially since the severity of the scandals does not seem to correlate directly with the speed and effectiveness of national leaders' responses? * What does this historical episode tell us about the influence of political institutions on policy outcomes? And what does it say about the relative performance of different national blood products regimes? Did it matter, for example, whether donors were paid or not, or whether nations were self-sufficient with regard to blood products rather than importing them from abroad? * What was the process through which hemophiliac groups and other affected parties came to see their greivances as legal and political claims against their governments and, at times, against the very organizations that had once represented them? * How can such tragedies be prevented in the future? This is, in short, a vital book for all those interested in this important chapter in the history of the AIDs tragedy, as well as for those who wish to learn more about how nations with very different cultures and political institutions respond to a common medical disaster.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|