13 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Inside the Tea Party(s), December 27, 2010
This review is from: Boiling Mad: Inside Tea Party America (Hardcover)
The Tea Party: is it a ragtag group of Birchers and birthers, a band of Joes-the-Plumber, a nation of whiners, the silent majority, or politics as usual? Journalist Kate Zernike's timely book argues that there is no single defining phrase that can inscribe the Tea Party movement, because it is hardly a single unified "movement" at all: rather, it is a diverse conglomeration of movements and various political ideals that has taken hold of many Americans, who are "fed up" over government spending, the bailout(s), taxes, (the) health care (law), among other things.
In a sense, the Tea Party is (or was? I am uncertain whether or not to use the past tense) as federalized as it would like to see the United States. It has its origins in Seattle, Chicago, Boston and wherever else a group of neighbors decided to gather and discuss how they would subvert federal spending, health care, and the Republican Party status quo, etc. The Tea Party focuses primarily on economic issues: supporters fervently oppose illegal immigration, they seek the repealing of the health care law, they are infuriated by what they see as reckless federal spending and an ever increasing and looming budget deficit and national debt. Most are in favor of the free market, which they see as 100% American. Many tea partiers get their inspiration from Bastait, Hayek, von Mises, and Ayn Rand; one tea partier argued that (I quote from memory) "we all know that Keyensian economics has been proved wrong. It wasn't FDR's New Deal policies that saved the economy from the Great Depression, it was WWII." (This shows the extent of many a tea partiers' "reasearch".)
The Tea Party, like the Republican Party in general, holds to the conviction that the Constitution must be interpreted from an "originalist" perspective: they argue that economic and social programs originating with the New Deal are unconstitutional. Indeed, their idolization of the Constitution is almost religious in its fervor and zeal, to the point where some (most?) would like to see Congress police itself in not passing bills that it does not have the power to pass under "enumerated powers." (I kept wanting to whisper to them: this is the Supreme Court's job.)
Many older tea partiers, however -- somewhat inconsistently -- are strongly in favor of social programs like Medicare and social security, and at certain times in the book it seemed like some tea partiers were oblivious to the fact that they were attempting to have their cake and eat it too. Other tea partiers would like to see the movement take on social issues like gay rights and abortion (and the legality of the Obama presidency), but those who would not like to see the movement become encumbered by such divisive issues overwhelmingly oppose them.
Zernike writes that the Tea Party filled the void left by the crippled Republican Party in the wake of the 2008 electoral defeats. Many voters who had never been very politically active saw that the Republican Party had become weak and ineffective; they saw the Republican Party as co-conspirators vis-à-vis the Democrats in so far as they supported the massive bailouts in wake of the financial crises. The Tea Party took off into this void, writes Zernike, with the help of new social media and networking: Facebook, YouTube, email, something I've never heard of called Ning, and Twitter, a social networking forum that lets users post substantive messages up to 140 characters long. I would have liked Zernike to focus more on how the Tea Party(s) were funded and perhaps how the media acted as the "gatekeepers" (as sociologists would say) of the movement; we never are given a substantive response to the claim that the Tea Party is an "astroturf" movement.
Nevertheless we are given a very fair portrait of the Tea Party, written with wonderful journalistic syntheses that incorporate the first-person perspectives of those who are actually a part of the movement. I often found myself -- dare I say it -- understanding the anger that many tea partiers feel...
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
18 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great inside look!, September 22, 2010
This review is from: Boiling Mad: Inside Tea Party America (Hardcover)
A comprehensive look inside Tea Party America. This book takes you person by person, story by story into the Tea Party. A great read for anyone interested in today's political climate. Zernike writes in a way that is easy to understand. It's obvious that this journalist has a passion for getting "the people's story" to the public.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Educational for Those New to Politics, May 21, 2011
This review is from: Boiling Mad: Inside Tea Party America (Hardcover)
This book is very entertaining and is educational for those of us new to politics. I've learned more from this book than I could watching the news for a year. The book has many stories in it which reveal methods that helped grow the Tea Party and methods for getting desired candidates elected. This is a must read!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No