I came across Iris Johansen's new trilogy in audiobook format at my local library and decided on a whim to borrow all 3 books: finally, the solution to a mystery that has kept legions of fans (myself not included) pondering for years. The experience has been akin to being arrested for a minor infraction, but instead of being sentenced to do community service, the judge required that I read the "Eve/Quinn/Bonnie" trilogy.
Where to start? Two discs into the first book "Eve", I was already quite disappointed. Out of curiosity, I logged on at Amazon and started to read reviews. To be sure, I wasn't the only one who felt let down by an author that I have personally largely ignored in my literary career. I have read a couple of her books in the distant past and don't remember being particularly impressed.
First, the narrative style. It is simplistic and lacks both depth and perception; it is hindered by a redundant vocabulary and a lack of imagination in the author's descriptive powers. Her characters stiffen, draw their breath in sharply and pause (when talking - I assume, so they have time to reflect on what they'll say next). That is the extent of their expressions. They inhale sharply. They pause. And they stiffen. So much so that the trilogy should really have been called "The Stiffening".
Second, the dialogs. It would appear that Iris Johansen narrates for the benefit of her readers through her dialogs. It makes for very strange dialogs. Characters who have known each other for a long time, sometimes years, talk to each other as if the other person doesn't know what he/she is talking about. Or sometimes, a character will comment about the other person's feelings as if that person was unaware of their own feelings. As I said, it makes for very strange dialogs. Listening to the generally asinine dialogs, I had to roll my eyes on more than one occasion.
Third, character development. Character development is glaringly absent. Eve and Catherine are easily interchangeable as well as Quinn and Gallo. In fact, Quinn and Gallo are so alike that it's hard to distinguish between the two. Both men are physically imposing, ex-military experts and, of course, master lovers. Gallo, the supposedly unstable ex-POW, is ever so polite and considerate except when he is making threats towards his perceived enemies. Quinn never gets annoyed with Eve despite her giving him the slip on numerous occasions. Quinn also tends to make threats of a physical nature, and like Gallo, hardly ever delivers. Among all main characters, there is far more bravado than action. Eve, I found hard to relate to or even sympathize with as she is so unlike any real-life woman. I found her approach to life unrealistic, her handling of Bonnie's kidnapping (described in more detail in the second book "Quinn") bordering on the casual, and her relationship to Quinn predictable. As for Gallo and their supposedly passionate, but purely physical, affair when she was 16 and he 19 - well, let's just say that I found it hard to swallow. Truth be told, Eve talks and reacts then very much as the adult Eve does, with no consideration by the author for Eve's young age, her experience or lack of. During the early weeks of Bonnie's disappearance, upon meeting Quinn, Eve checks his background as his good looks make her doubtful that he, Quinn, an FBI agent, could keep his focus on the investigation. Mostly, when reading, I thought of the parents of abducted children and knew that no parents would act and talk as Eve Duncan does, with such casualness and self-control. Where is the devastation, the tearing of the heart, the pain felt at every-single-moment-of-the-day? There would be no occasion to comment about Quinn's good looks, his physical appeal, there would be rage and despair and anguish, and nothing else, and that never comes across the pages. Never.
And finally Bonnie. Bonnie, 7-year-old little ghost who talks to her mother from the other side as no 7 year old would ever talk, who has the vocabulary and the sensibility of an adult. Johansen explains this by saying that "something happened on the other side" to make Bonnie more mature. It made for awkward dialogs between mother and daughter, with Bonnie pontificating on the nature of Eve's distress at her disappearance.
Fourth: story line. I have not read enough of Johansen previous novels featuring Eve Duncan to really judge the trilogy in its context, but it appears Johansen fills in the blanks when she describes how Eve met both Gallo (in exquisite detail) and Quinn. There is a lot of repetition throughout the 3 novels with some chapters being entirely repeated in Book 2 and 3 (some fillers!). If Johansen had summed up the entire affair between Eve and Gallo in the few lines it deserved, edited her dialogs, deleted all the bluster, limited allusions to hardening, stiffening, inhaling and pausing, if she had avoided copying and pasting entire portions of her books into the next volumes, she could have fitted the whole story in one book to the eternal gratitude of her readers and their pocket books.
This is very poor fiction and a sham on all readers.