The Book of Revelation (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries) [Paperback]

Leon Morris (Author, Photographer)

Book Description

Publication Date: February 1987 | Series: Tyndale New Testament Commentaries (Book 20)

Morris's study on the Book of Revelation is part of the Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, a popular series designed to help the general Bible reader understand clearly what the text actually says and what it means, with a minimum of dependence on scholarly technicalities.

Product Details

• Paperback: 256 pages
• Publisher: Send the Light; Rev Sub edition (February 1987)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0802802737
• ISBN-13: 978-0802802736
• Product Dimensions: 7.6 x 5.3 x 0.6 inches
• Shipping Weight: 8 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 4.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,583,723 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

28 of 30 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Great Commentary, March 28, 2000

By 

John DePoe (Iowa City, Iowa USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: The Book of Revelation (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries) (Paperback)

If you are interested in getting a commentary that is the result of a lot of top level scholarly work, but don't want alot of the way advanced technical terminology, this is a good book for you. Don't get me wrong, nothing is watered down or made simple. It is still very scholarly and detailed, but it is understandable. The whole Tyndale series is an excellent buy.

10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Good but overly brief treatment of Revelation, June 8, 2008

By 

moviemusicbuff (Walnut, CA United States) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Revelation (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries) (Paperback)

I've used this commentary for my Sunday School class and it's received good feedback from laypeople who want a brief and clearly written exposition of Revelation. Leon Morris adopts a non-dispensationalist viewpoint in his commentary. It was hard to discern whether he was amillennial or historical premillennial. He believes that Rev. 20 describes the reign of the martyrs rather than the reign of all the saints. A very interesting perspective. In any case, he interprets the 144,000 and the great multitude in Revelation 7 as representing spiritual Israel (the church) rather than literal Israel.

Here are some of my assessments of this commentary.

Good points:

1) It is easy to read and the explanations are clear

2) Morris provides an excellent outline of the whole book of Revelation

3) Morris reminds the reader that we need to adopt a humble and open-mind when reading the book of Revelation

Weak points:

1) Explanations are too brief or vague at points. Examples:

"hidden manna" (Rev. 2: 17) -- Morris is somewhat ambiguous in his explanation of what exactly it is; "white stone" (2:17) -- Morris offers different suggestions on what it could mean and concludes "we simply do not know what the white stone signified, though clearly it did convey some assurance of blessing"; it is frustrating to read a commentary when the commentator says "we don't really know what this means." It is honest but not very helpful! (it is better for Morris to make a decision on what he sees as the most likely explanation)

2) Insufficient explanation for why certain things should be interpreted

Example: Morris states that the "Two Witnesses" in Rev. 11: 1-14 should be interpreted symbolically rather than literally. He states that "difficulties multiply" when one takes the "Two Witnesses" literally. What difficulties? To me, the symbolic interpretation of the "Two Witnesses" as representing the church has more difficulties than the literal interpretation. How does one interpret the dead bodies lying in the street if the two witnesses represent the church? How does one interpret the 3 1/2 days, and then the witnesses being caught up to God?

Yes, chapter 11 is one of the most difficult chapters in Revelation to interpret. I was expecting Morris to do a more complete job of explaining his interpretation, but he didn't do an adequate job in explaining his reasons for interpretation other than giving blanket statements.

3) Morris should clearly state what his position is. For example, in the introduction of the commentary, he explains 4 different approaches in interpreting Revelation (preterist, historicist, idealist, and futurist). He states that one should incorporate several of these approaches and not just one approach. Yet, Morris fails to tell the reader which approaches he adopts.

I noticed this throughout the commentary; Morris sometimes would present different options or suggestions on what a phrase or passage means, and then would not clearly state what his position is. I appreciated it when he did take a position.

This aside, I still found this commentary to be helpful, in spite of its brevity. If you want to read a more complete expositional commentary, you can't go wrong with reading Robert Mounce's excellent commentary in the New International Commentary of the New Testament (Eerdmans). I find Mounce's viewpoint to be similar to that of Morris, but he gives a much more complete explanation both in his commentary and in his interpretation of certain passages. George E. Ladd's commentary on Revelation also offers a similar viewpoint as Morris' but a fuller explanation as well. If you want an excellent and more technical non-dispensationalist commentary on Revelation, read G.K. Beale's commentary on Revelation (which requires the reader to be familiar with Greek).

There is a plethora of outstanding commentaries out there on Revelation. What I've mentioned above are two excellent expositional commentaries on Revelation that hold a similar viewpoint and non-dispensationalist interpretation as Morris.

Morris is a good introductory commentary but you need to consult other commentaries which offer a more complete and satisfactory explanation on the whole book.

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Ideal for Intense Yet Introductory Eschatological Studies, December 5, 2009

By 

Francis Booth Lynch "Zuthas" (Louisville, KY) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Revelation (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries) (Paperback)

Just a little about me: I have my BA in biblical and theological studies from a conservative seminary. I teach Sunday morning bible study. I have ADD and dyslexia so I have to be extra patient with a book.

I cannot say enough about this commentary. I really enjoyed Morris's work here. I feel like I have an enhanced understanding of the book of Revelation. I accompanied this book with Mounce and his NICNT commentary, but eventually I relied mainly on Morris as his level of scholarship is unsurpassed. This is not a put down to Mounce, I just think Morris did a tremendous job. If you bring a lot of church baggage or are committed to the Premillennial position to the point that other views disgust you then this book will not please you; I know from those I have taught this to in my church, but I think you are only hurting yourself.

A great progression for you if your interested in enhancing your personal study in eschatology, from an Amillennial perspective, would be (in this order): Graeme Goldsworthy "Gospel and Kingdom" (emphasize finding Jesus in the OT), Kim Riddlebarger "The Man of Sin" and "A case for Amillennialism". While you read these study Revelation with Morris's commentary and you will have a firm grasp on eschatology. Even if you hate Ammillennialism you would be served well by reading these. If you struggle with reading due to a reading ailment then your in luck because if I did it then you can too. Also, you will learn other important things in this process such as hermeneutics.