Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

Buy New

Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
Buy Used
Used - Like New See details
$3.54 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
Sold by SourceMedia.

More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here

Bottom Feeder (Unrated) (2006)

Tom Sizemore , Wendy Anderson , Randy Daudlin  |  Unrated |  DVD
3.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (12 customer reviews)

List Price: $7.93
Price: $5.00 & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
You Save: $2.93 (37%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Gift-wrap available.
Want it Friday, Oct. 24? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details

Other Formats & Versions

Amazon Price New from Used from
DVD 1-Disc Version $5.00  
Deal of the Week: Save 56% on The Tim Burton Collection on Blu-ray
This week only, save 56% on The Tim Burton Collection and Hardcover Book on Blu-ray. Fan-favorite films include: Pee Wee's Big Adventure, Beetlejuice, Batman (1989), Batman Returns (1992), Mars Attacks!, Corpse Bride, and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005). The offer to own this collection ends October 25, 2014, 11:59 pm PST. Shop now

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Videos Related to This Product

Product Details

  • Actors: Tom Sizemore, Wendy Anderson, Richard Fitzpatrick, Amber Cull, Martin Roach
  • Directors: Randy Daudlin
  • Writers: Randy Daudlin
  • Format: Multiple Formats, Closed-captioned, Color, NTSC, Widescreen
  • Language: English
  • Region: Region 1 (U.S. and Canada only. Read more about DVD formats.)
  • Aspect Ratio: 1.78:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Rated: Unrated
  • Studio: Peace Arch
  • DVD Release Date: April 3, 2007
  • Run Time: 86 minutes
  • Average Customer Review: 3.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (12 customer reviews)
  • ASIN: B000ION758
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #258,578 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
  • Learn more about "Bottom Feeder (Unrated)" on IMDb

Special Features


Editorial Reviews

(Horror) Evil lies beneath the surface in this thrilling, edge-of-your-seat gore and monster-fest! Sizemore stars as a maintenance worker who, along with his crew, is hunted and terrorized by an indestructible creature. Featuring slick and gruesome effects in the vein of Feast, Slither, The Descent, The Cave and other recent horror hits!

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
24 of 24 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Decent little monster movie.....2 1/2 Stars March 28, 2007
The plot is a little convoluted with the antagonist billionare skulking in the back of his limosine in an abandoned building's parking garage, while the action happens below in tunnels. The monster's creation it is genre standard stuff. All of the charactors are cliche'd in one way or another. The creature effects were decent, as were the practical effects overall.

My biggest gripes are:

1. Lack atmosphere, which I think had to do with the choice of lighting, lenses, and editing for the underground scenes.

2. Lack of tension. Without spoiling anything, there was more intensity in one particular line given by Sizemore at the begining of the third act than any menace given off by the monster in the whole film. The monster actually peeks around corners like a shy child and was slow enough to be outrun for most of the "chase". Bottom line: not scary.

3. For people running from a monster in fear for their lives , the charactors kept stopping in the middle of the hallways to stand around and spout out extended expositional dialogue.

And a word of warning: the DVD cover art touts this as "UNRATED" in bloody red letters, but I put forth that they just didn't bother to submit it to the MPAA. There isn't much blood, some standard gore (lopped off heads, nothing really new there), no nudity, and no swearing that I remember. It's actually closer to a PG-13 than an R in my opinion, and with very little editing you'll probably see it on basic cable soon.

The "Making Of" feature was a basic collection of short interviews with the director and selected cast talking about the filming experience intercut with scenes from the movie. Everyone seemed to be enjoying the themselves, but tired from the quick shooting schedule.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Bottom Feeder Says it All December 6, 2007
Bottom Feeder actually grabs your interest while you're browsing the DVD section with its intriguing cover, however, if only the movie was that direct. This movie capatalizes on the scientist and the villian plot that takes a turn for the worse when the villian decides to use the experiment on the scientist prior to himself, what an original thought, if you believe that...Tom Sizemore leads a lackluster cast through underground trails to investigate a disturbance brought to his attention by the obnoxious member of his gardening team. When they come across the poor inflicted scientist he has already started to become the horrific creature that the villian suspected he might evolve into. The villian sends his cohorts down to investigate the scientist only to discover the hideous creature, which in turn, destroys them. This movie is barely a B film more like a D. I don't know what happened to Tom Sizemores' career that catapulted him down to this level, maybe he needed the money. I purchased the film for $5 used, I would be very fortunate to get the value of postage back. I can't even recommend this film to a group of friends that thrive on B films. If you enjoy films that have absolutely no innovation, depth, creativity or acting ability, this is the film for you.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Fun! May 22, 2009
Bottom Feeder (Randy Daudlin, 2006)

Silly, but kind of enjoyable, flick about experimental medicine gone horribly awry. Not really scary, but fun enough that you won't turn it off if you stumble across it during a bout of insomnia.

Nathaniel Leech (Land of the Dead's James Binkley) is a doctor who's been working on a drug that will regenerate damaged tissue. Charles Deaver (16 Blocks' Richard Fitzpatrick) is a billionaire who was burned over most of his body in a horrible accident. He got wind of Leech's work, and has offered Leech an incredible sum of money for a course of the treatment. When the two finally meet, however, and Leech tells Deaver it's still experimental, Deaver's reaction is less than pleasant; he has his security agent, Krendal (Alien Apocalypse's Wendy Anderson), beat Leech to within an inch of his life and then test the drug on him. If it works, well, Deaver will take the cure and pay him. Problem is, the drug's got some side effects. Leech has accounted for those with a second shot, but the ingredients for that one were left on the other side of a locked door, and so the side effects take over. Meanwhile, in another part of the underground complex, a maintenance crew led by Vince Stoker (Tom Sizemore) are canvassing the tunnels to make sure no homeless folks have decided to bunk down in there. Obviously, what they find is not a homeless person...

First, the good: some of the acting. Sizemore has been a notoriously inconsistent actor for the past decade or so, but his performance here is competent at worst, and has some real moments. Also, don't overlook Amber Cull as Sizemore's niece, who would go on to a role in Lucky McKee's The Woods later that year. Pretty much everyone here does well.
Read more ›
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Nothing new, but nothing horribly wrong either September 27, 2007
Format:DVD|Verified Purchase
There are only 3 other reviews here at the moment, so I won't rehash the plot since others have already done a good job of that and you won't have to dig through 50 reviews to know the basic plot.

So, on to how good or bad it is. Well, you can tell by the stars that it's not particularly impressive, but there's no huge faults and the acting is solid.

It makes for a good popcorn movie and there is some decent gore for those who like it, but you've seen it all before. This is simply another monster in shadowy hallways movie; nothing more, nothing less.

It does have one of my biggest pet peeves, though. This is probably best put down to personal taste, but there are two cliche's with horror movie monsters that I'm really getting tired of seeing: excessive drooling and a wet, slimy sheen to the body. Can't anything have dry skin and not slobber like a Saint Bernard? Does it always have to be like this?

It's a shame, too, because our hungry friend gets a lot of good screen time. This isn't one of those movies that keeps the creature hidden.

I give it two stars because I like the basic concept. A guy takes a metabolic drug that gives him an out-of-control appetite, and he takes on attributes of the things he eats (rats, a dog, etc.). So you end up with a fairly unique critter with one big rat ear, a wolfish snout, rat's teeth and bumpy, discolored skin. Shame about all the wetness and drooling. He would have looked much better with a toweling off and better spittle control.

And let's face it, a 4-star monster in a 2-star movie means a lot of fast-forwarding after the first viewing. There's nothing else here worth seeing again.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars Good for a laugh
Good for a laugh. Good low budget effects and decdnt acting. Hopefully therd is no sequel, but I laughed at this one enough to suffer through another.
Published 20 months ago by Darryl
4.0 out of 5 stars "What's this got to do with maintenance?"
This is a generic monster flick that offers nothing new, not it execution or story-wise. It's standard stuff with stock situations and characters. Read more
Published 21 months ago by Einsatz
4.0 out of 5 stars "I Just Want To Go Home...And Watch Reality T.V.!"
Bottom Feeder: Movie Review

Grade: B+

...Yes, that is seriously a line that Tom Sizemore say's in the movie. Read more
Published on May 10, 2009 by brownie
4.0 out of 5 stars Not Really Bad For Budget Icky Bug
Bottom Feeder was, by no means, academy award material. Then again, if it was, it would probably suck. Read more
Published on May 4, 2009 by Fred Rayworth
5.0 out of 5 stars Don's Review

Published on October 28, 2008 by Donald R. Butler
1.0 out of 5 stars Bad...just bad
I like to take chances and purchase unheard of titles. Some are winners, some are losers. This one falls into the latter category.
Published on August 16, 2008 by MDD
4.0 out of 5 stars better than expected
Great effects, good gross factor, culd have used more scares. Good story and leaves it open for more carnage. Over all great horror film.
Published on August 14, 2007 by Deimos
3.0 out of 5 stars When Med-Science Goes Wrong
A disfigured millionaire has hired a doctor to find a cure for his condition. The doctor comes up with a serum that will help the body heal at a phenomenal rate. Read more
Published on July 6, 2007 by Joshua Koppel
Search Customer Reviews
Search these reviews only


There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Look for Similar Items by Category