The Brain Takes Shape: An Early History [Hardcover]

Robert L. Martensen (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: April 8, 2004 | ISBN-10: 0195151720 | ISBN-13: 978-0195151725 | Edition: 1

Using historical and anthropological perspectives to examine mind-body relationships in western thought, this book interweaves topics that are usually disconnected to tell a big, important story in the histories of medicine, science, philosophy, religion, and political rhetoric. Beginning with early debates during the Scientific Revolution about representation and reality, Martensen demonstrates how investigators such as Vesalius and Harvey sought to transform long-standing notions of the body as dominated by spirit-like humors into portrayals that emphasized its solid tissues. Subsequently, Descartes and Willis and their followers amended this 'new' philosophy to argue for the primacy of the cerebral hemispheres and cranial nerves as they downplayed the role of the spirit, passion, and the heart in human thought and behavior. None of this occurred in a social vacuum, and the book places these medical and philosophical innovations in the context of the religious and political crises of the Reformation and English Civil War and its aftermath. Patrons and their interests are part of the story, as are patients and new formulations of gender. John Locke's psychology and the emergence in England of a constitutional monarchy figure prominently, as do opponents of the new doctrines of brain and nerves and the emergent social order. The book's concluding chapter discusses how debates over investigative methods and models of body order that first raged over 300 years ago continue to influence biomedicine and the broader culture today. No other book on western mind-body relationships has attempted this.

Editorial Reviews

From The New England Journal of Medicine

This is a well-researched book about an important topic that is underrepresented in the history of science: the transformation, mainly during the 17th century, of the widespread belief that the heart is the primary locus of personhood to the belief that, in fact, the brain serves this function. The story Martensen tells, however, is not just of anatomical discovery. The author weaves a theme throughout the book about the declining importance in natural philosophy of "presence" -- which he defines as the "tendency to imagine knowledge of the world and the world itself as dependent on the spiritual capacity and interaction of knower and known" -- in favor of "likeness" -- "the epistemic assumption that one may know substantial aspects of material nature and depict them accurately without relying heavily on spiritual capacities and relationships of the observer and observed." (Both terms are drawn from the German art historian Hans Belting.) The increasing importance of "likeness" (as we would now call it) in science brought with it a growing acceptance of, and even a preference for, precise imagery. Whereas medieval anatomical sketches tended to be rather crude and schematic, the Renaissance gave greater attention to accurate and detailed pictorial rendering. Martensen notes that this shift, ironically, occurred at almost the very time that the Protestant Reformation was downgrading the significance of religious imagery in favor of biblical text. The book has nine chapters. The first two set the scene by introducing a number of major background figures: Vesalius, Harvey, Paracelsus, Bacon, and Van Helmont. Then Martensen discusses the anatomical work of Rene Descartes, arguing that although pictorial imagery played a much greater role in Descartes's writings than in those of his predecessors, Descartes was still more beholden to the tradition of presence than to the emerging value of likeness in his thinking about the brain and its relation to the mind. At the center of the book is Thomas Willis and his seminal works on the anatomy of the brain. Willis and his fellow Oxfordians rejected Descartes's fascination with the pineal gland and his speculative view of the mind as an "unextended substance" in favor of a description of the nervous system in its own right. Martensen is careful, however, not to make the old mistake of casting Willis and his colleagues as "pure" scientists, wholly detached from the world around them. This was, after all, the time of the English Civil War, the execution of Charles I, Cromwell's Protectorate, and finally, the restoration of the monarchy. Throughout the book, Martensen details the religious and political pressures that informed Willis's work. Unlike Descartes, who believed the soul to be unitary, Willis, following Galen and Plato, held that there were multiple human souls -- rational, sensitive, vital, and so forth -- corresponding roughly to what we today might call different mental functions, and that these can come into conflict with one another. This concept enabled Willis, in turn, to reclassify a number of pathologic conditions, widely believed at the time to be humoral in origin, as neurologic disorders. Sometimes he was right (as in the case of convulsions) and sometimes wrong (scurvy), but his hypotheses marked an important transformation in the understanding of the person nonetheless. In one chapter, Martensen considers the transformational effect of Willis's "neurocentric" position specifically for the understanding of women's anatomy and pathology, especially of "hysteria." He concludes the book with consideration of the medical and broader philosophical consequences of Willis's approach. These include the empiricism of the 18th-century British Enlightenment, which, it may surprise the reader to learn, arose at least as much from a critique of Willis's method as from an adherence to it. Martensen also briefly traces the sequelae of these debates to modern times, in the works of figures such as Walter Canon, Antonio Damasio, and a variety of phenomenologists and cognitive scientists. Martensen's writing combines the expert technical knowledge of a working physician with the professional historian's sensitivity to matters of context and wariness of histories that are too eager to celebrate rather than to carefully describe and analyze. This is an excellent book. Christopher D. Green, Ph.D.
Copyright © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. The New England Journal of Medicine is a registered trademark of the MMS.

Review

"This is a well-researched book about an important topic that is underrepresented in the history of science: the transformation, mainly during the 17th century, of the widespread belief that the heart is the primary locus of personhood to the belief that, in fact, the brain serves this function." --The New England Journal of Medicine

"While fascinating as a textbook of medical intellectual history, the greatest thrill comes when the reader connects the historical material to his or her 21st century experience...Any psychiatrist, physician, healer or therapist who seeks to increase his or her perspective beyond the constraints of current schools of thought will cherish this book." --Ole J. Thienhaus, M.D., University of Nevada Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

"Matensen has provided a rich and fascinating account of the origins of our modern understanding of the relations of mind and brain."--Bulletin of the History of Medicine

"...this is an excellent book that integrates Martensen's earlier writings on anatomy, theology, and women's bodies with newer materials in challenging and satisfying ways. It deserves a wide readership."--Journal of the History of Medicine

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 280 pages
• Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA; 1 edition (April 8, 2004)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0195151720
• ISBN-13: 978-0195151725
• Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 6.1 x 0.9 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,755,321 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.