|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Review
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Shameful!,
By Amanda Pike (NY) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Dracula: the Novelisation (Paperback)
The novel Dracula does not need to be re-adapted based on other interpretations. It's my personal view that the classic novel is a work of literary genius and can stand up perfectly well on it's own. Buy the regular Bram Stoker's Dracula novel, the real one originally published in 1897. You will be a lot happier for it. This should not exist. This is a redundancy. The film Bram Stoker's Dracula was very faithful to the novel by Bram Stoker. That is why it is called Bram Stoker's Dracula. This is a shameless exploitation for money and an insult to classic literature. Read the real novel. If you truly appreciate the film than you would not want to diminish the value of the work of literature it was based on. Don't buy this just for the pretty 'romantic' implications. The film was meant to be an adaptation of Bram Stoker's novel. Don't insult his memory with this dribble. |
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Bram Stoker's Dracula: A Francis Ford Coppola Film by James V. Hart (Mass Market Paperback - November 1, 1992)
Used & New from: $0.01
| ||