Trapped in a triangle of the housing market collapse, rising energy costs, and an increasingly dysfunctional healthcare system, America's working poor are now battling an even more formidable enemy: hunger. This time, the battle is taking place well outside of the media spotlight, which has focused on obesity, another food-related epidemic affecting the poor. Breadline USA tells the stories of Americans in all types of communities who struggle to put any type of food on the table come the end of the month when money runs out and the social safety net isnt there to catch them.
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Journalist Abramsky (Hard Times Blues) combines an account of his own seven-week experiment in living on a poverty budget with moving vignettes of men and women who have fallen through society's frayed safety net and are suffering from food insecurity. Tens of millions of Americans live in a continual state of anxiety; to malnutrition is added the further suffering of shame and despair. Focusing on communities in Western states, the author uncovers the tragedy of the collapse of the middle class. Unionized industrial giants like General Motors have fallen on hard times and global economic restructuring has had a devastating impact on many workers, often stripping them of benefits accumulated over decades. Although providing a vivid glimpse into the world of food banks and soup kitchens, the book, which reads like a series of newspaper articles, offers few suggestions for solving the problem aside from challenging political leaders to make corrections to a system gone tragically awry. (June)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
"Abramsky writes in the best tradition of Barbara Ehrenreich, Studs Terkel, and John Steinbeck. The fruit of his patient and compassionate research, Breadline USA, is required reading for all of us concerned to banish, forever, the long hidden legacy of hunger in America." -- Raj Patel "Author of Stuffed and Starved"
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
Cross-posted from www.jspot.org
I just finished Sasha Abramsky's excellent Breadline USA: The Hidden Scandal of American Hunger and How to Fix It. Abramsky takes us inside food pantries, soup kitchens, and school lunch programs and introduces us to Americans struggling to feed themselves and their families. In a series of "interludes," Abramsky recounts his own adventures in hunger--while researching the book, he spends seven weeks living on a reduced food budget in order better to understand how it feels to be hungry.
The funny thing about this book is: while it purports to be about hunger, it's actually about jobs.
All of the people whom Abramsky profiles are victims of our country's broken labor system. He devotes a chapter to the way that Wal-Mart has driven down wages for the entire service industry, laments the decline in the real value of the minimum wage, and visits manufacturing workers who have lost their pensions in a multi-million dollar company buy-out.
Other issues come up as well: as a result of rising gas prices (at the time that the book was published), work isn't always profitable, and the high cost of health care means that a single health crisis can plunge a family into debt. Come to think of it, these last two issues are about jobs as well. . .
Rabbis and synagogue members often tell me that they have chosen, as a community, to work on hunger because of the prevalance of this issue in America, and because the issue is "not political." And it's easy to identify with hunger--all of us have experienced at least mild hunger pains, many of us are familiar with end-of-Yom Kippur nausea and weakness, and some of us grew up hearing the hunger memories of Holocaust survivors. Jewish sources point to hunger as the most obvious mark of poverty, and demand that each community care for its hungry members.
It's true that hunger is way too common in the US, true that it's virtually impossible to find a fresh vegetable in many low-income neighborhoods, and true that far too many people depend on emergency food programs such as soup kitchens and food pantries.
That said, hunger isn't really the issue. The US Conference of Mayors has found that, in 25 cities surveyed, fully 40% of those who access emergency food programs are employed. That is--having a job is no guarantee that one will be able to afford housing, health care, transportation, food, and other basics of life.
While the price of food has gone up in the past few years, food remains a relatively small percentage of most families' budgets, compared to housing and health care. We are aware of the hunger crisis because many families choose to buy food last--lest failure to pay rent result in eviction, or failure to pay for certain health costs result in serious illness or death--and because emergency food is generally more available than emergency housing or health care.
I'm not saying that we should stop paying any attention to hunger. I, personally, give money to my local food bank, and periodically volunteer for emergency food programs. Today, when so many people are out of work, or facing reduced pay or hours, our food banks and soup kitchens are stretched beyond their limits, and desperately in need of monetary and volunteer help (with monetary being the key word).
That said, a focus on hunger can cause us to lose sight of the real issue--falling wages. Many of our communities don't want to tackle this issue, as any forays into minimum wage, living wage, union organizing, or other related issues can feel too "political." But choosing to address the symptom of hunger without fixing our national wage crisis is also a political choice.
Now, you might remind me at this point that we're in the midst of an economic crisis, that companies are shedding jobs left and right, and that many businesses consider wage reductions to be the only way to stay in business. But this approach is short-sighted. As Paul Krugman points out, lowering wages might set a dangerous precedent that will make economic recovery more difficult:
[S]oon we may be facing the paradox of wages: workers at any one company can help save their jobs by accepting lower wages, but when employers across the economy cut wages at the same time, the result is higher unemployment.
Here's how the paradox works. Suppose that workers at the XYZ Corporation accept a pay cut. That lets XYZ management cut prices, making its products more competitive. Sales rise, and more workers can keep their jobs. So you might think that wage cuts raise employment -- which they do at the level of the individual employer.
But if everyone takes a pay cut, nobody gains a competitive advantage. So there's no benefit to the economy from lower wages. Meanwhile, the fall in wages can worsen the economy's problems on other fronts.
In particular, falling wages, and hence falling incomes, worsen the problem of excessive debt: your monthly mortgage payments don't go down with your paycheck. America came into this crisis with household debt as a percentage of income at its highest level since the 1930s. Families are trying to work that debt down by saving more than they have in a decade -- but as wages fall, they're chasing a moving target. And the rising burden of debt will put downward pressure on consumer spending, keeping the economy depressed.
Krugman suggests devoting a significant part of the stimulus money to creating well-paying jobs that will set the standard for a new economy.
Few of us can stomach the sight of long lines of people waiting for hot meals and food boxes in one of the world's wealthiest countries. But, as Abramsky's book quietly points out, the solution to hunger will come through a revolution in our employment laws, and not through increased access to emergency food assistance.
Rabbi Jill Jacobs, author of There Shall Be No Needy: Pursuing Social Justice Through Jewish Law & Tradition
I just finished Sasha Abramsky's excellent Breadline USA: The Hidden Scandal of American Hunger and How to Fix It. Abramsky takes us inside food pantries, soup kitchens, and school lunch programs and introduces us to Americans struggling to feed themselves and their families. In a series of "interludes," Abramsky recounts his own adventures in hunger--while researching the book, he spends seven weeks living on a reduced food budget in order better to understand how it feels to be hungry.
The funny thing about this book is: while it purports to be about hunger, it's actually about jobs.
All of the people whom Abramsky profiles are victims of our country's broken labor system. He devotes a chapter to the way that Wal-Mart has driven down wages for the entire service industry, laments the decline in the real value of the minimum wage, and visits manufacturing workers who have lost their pensions in a multi-million dollar company buy-out.
Other issues come up as well: as a result of rising gas prices (at the time that the book was published), work isn't always profitable, and the high cost of health care means that a single health crisis can plunge a family into debt. Come to think of it, these last two issues are about jobs as well. . .
Rabbis and synagogue members often tell me that they have chosen, as a community, to work on hunger because of the prevalance of this issue in America, and because the issue is "not political." And it's easy to identify with hunger--all of us have experienced at least mild hunger pains, many of us are familiar with end-of-Yom Kippur nausea and weakness, and some of us grew up hearing the hunger memories of Holocaust survivors. Jewish sources point to hunger as the most obvious mark of poverty, and demand that each community care for its hungry members.
It's true that hunger is way too common in the US, true that it's virtually impossible to find a fresh vegetable in many low-income neighborhoods, and true that far too many people depend on emergency food programs such as soup kitchens and food pantries.
That said, hunger isn't really the issue. The US Conference of Mayors has found that, in 25 cities surveyed, fully 40% of those who access emergency food programs are employed. That is--having a job is no guarantee that one will be able to afford housing, health care, transportation, food, and other basics of life.
While the price of food has gone up in the past few years, food remains a relatively small percentage of most families' budgets, compared to housing and health care. We are aware of the hunger crisis because many families choose to buy food last--lest failure to pay rent result in eviction, or failure to pay for certain health costs result in serious illness or death--and because emergency food is generally more available than emergency housing or health care.
I'm not saying that we should stop paying any attention to hunger. I, personally, give money to my local food bank, and periodically volunteer for emergency food programs. Today, when so many people are out of work, or facing reduced pay or hours, our food banks and soup kitchens are stretched beyond their limits, and desperately in need of monetary and volunteer help (with monetary being the key word).
That said, a focus on hunger can cause us to lose sight of the real issue--falling wages. Many of our communities don't want to tackle this issue, as any forays into minimum wage, living wage, union organizing, or other related issues can feel too "political." But choosing to address the symptom of hunger without fixing our national wage crisis is also a political choice.
Now, you might remind me at this point that we're in the midst of an economic crisis, that companies are shedding jobs left and right, and that many businesses consider wage reductions to be the only way to stay in business. But this approach is short-sighted. As Paul Krugman points out, lowering wages might set a dangerous precedent that will make economic recovery more difficult:
[S]oon we may be facing the paradox of wages: workers at any one company can help save their jobs by accepting lower wages, but when employers across the economy cut wages at the same time, the result is higher unemployment.
Here's how the paradox works. Suppose that workers at the XYZ Corporation accept a pay cut. That lets XYZ management cut prices, making its products more competitive. Sales rise, and more workers can keep their jobs. So you might think that wage cuts raise employment -- which they do at the level of the individual employer.
But if everyone takes a pay cut, nobody gains a competitive advantage. So there's no benefit to the economy from lower wages. Meanwhile, the fall in wages can worsen the economy's problems on other fronts.
In particular, falling wages, and hence falling incomes, worsen the problem of excessive debt: your monthly mortgage payments don't go down with your paycheck. America came into this crisis with household debt as a percentage of income at its highest level since the 1930s. Families are trying to work that debt down by saving more than they have in a decade -- but as wages fall, they're chasing a moving target. And the rising burden of debt will put downward pressure on consumer spending, keeping the economy depressed.
Krugman suggests devoting a significant part of the stimulus money to creating well-paying jobs that will set the standard for a new economy.
Few of us can stomach the sight of long lines of people waiting for hot meals and food boxes in one of the world's wealthiest countries. But, as Abramsky's book quietly points out, the solution to hunger will come through a revolution in our employment laws, and not through increased access to emergency food assistance.
Rabbi Jill Jacobs, author of There Shall Be No Needy: Pursuing Social Justice Through Jewish Law & Tradition
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
By Lisa
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
This book will come in handy during my research project however I wish it didn't smell musty and I wonder why it was even sold. Hunger among the poor is real and the media really just does not get it. Living on the "thrifty" meal plan is like having less than five dollars a day for your meals. Who really can live on that in 2012?
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
The title of this review was the only positive point of said review. The only reason I had to get the book was for a Communications class, so I went into this read already disappointed. But I was somewhat hopeful on the subject matter, hoping it would expose me to something I wasn't aware of. It did, but not very well. The author comes of as a somewhat spoiled young man, at least compared to his subjects, but stated at the beginning of the book he was willing to step into their shoes. Sadly he only did this halfway as he would "cheat" sometimes and not live the proposed life. He was biased in all of his opinions and by the end of this book I was sad to say he failed in his attempt. Even worse, come to find out we only needed the book for one day of discussion.....all in all this was a complete waste of my time. Do yourself a favor and find a better book to read.
Front Cover | Front Flap | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Flap | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
