Customer Reviews

Breathless

5 star:		(68)
4 star:		(36)
3 star:		(65)
2 star:		(82)
1 star:		(115)

 

 

I've always enjoyed Dean Koontz. I haven't read a whole lot of his books...but probably a good half-dozen of them over the years, and none have ever been disappointments. However, he's managed to leave me disappointed this time. Not because this book didn't have all the elements of a really great book. It did. But simply because it never fully realizes its potential.

Koontz gives a great setup. Lots of characters with rich histories...many of them rooted in deep pain. The gentle furniture maker who used to be a military assassin, the dedicated veterinarian who was the victim of mental and physical abuse for 10 years as a child, the serial killer who's only once come close to being caught and is on the hunt again...as a work for hire, and the twin who is on a gruesome mission to "become" his brother. All strong stuff. And then we've got the overriding mystery...two nearly-indescribable creatures who appear out of thin air and display nobler-than-human behavior. Why are they here? Where did they come from? And will they become guinea pigs in the labs of big, bad Homeland Security?

This really is a compelling set of questions...and it takes about 7 hours and 45 minutes of the 8-hour audio book to get to this place. But then...Koontz seems to weary of the story, or run out of ideas, or something. Whatever the cause, he neatly wraps up many (but not all) of the questions he's raised so quickly that it belies the (at times plodding) pace of the earlier parts of the book. Personally, I was left wanting. There's a gentle-enough sensibility about the book...I'd even describe it as beautiful at points...that I can't believe this was a cynical attempt on the author's part to provide a setup and then not finish the job...but it comes up so short of his usual work that I still had to consider the possibility.

Read the rest of the review at [...]

In the Colorado Rockies, Grady Adams and his Irish wolfhound, Merlin, have just discovered two creatures unlike anything they've ever seen before. As they welcome these mysterious animals into their home, they soon discover that their arrival coincides with a wondrous event that will forever change their lives and millions of other all over the world.

Dean Koontz never seems ceases to astonish me with the amount of tricks up his sleeve. Each installment in his illustrious career is unique and otherworldly, with Breathless being no exception. In recent offerings Koontz has come under fire, unfairly so in my opinion, for not being the same guy who once scared us around every turn with evil characters and harrowing plots. Lately, dogs have become main characters more than usual, and for whatever reason a lot of fans and critics alike have not looked kindly upon his change of style. In a bold and effective move, Koontz sticks it to the doubters and transforms familiar elements in a way we never imagined.

Not only is Man's Best Friend featured in Breathless, but in this story animals play a bigger role than most of, if not all, Koontz's previous works. However, fans who feel like they have been missing out will be pleased to know that this is one of the most suspenseful novels Koontz has written in a while, with a fast paced plot laced with just the right amount of dread, wonder, and redemption. We're even treated to some frightening and disturbing scenes that will have many readers looking under their beds and in their closets long after reading. Once again Koontz`s prose and dialogue are delivered at the highest level as we follow several storylines to a powerful conclusion.

In the end we are left with a poignant glimpse into the beauty of nature and the mystery of life and the wonder that connects them. I love what Koontz has done of late, and I particularly love what he's given us here. Breathless is certainly a different kind of animal, but one that is well worth your time.

Dean Koontz is an enigma of a writer. Some of his books have unforgettable plots, characters, and mystery. A few miss one or more of those. "Breathless" lacks all three. As usual, he starts to create a mystery but quickly falls back into colorful description of scenery, people and moods. Count how often he uses color related words such as copper, gold, silver, blue, etc etc etc to describe the sky, the grass, the road, the twilight, a meadow, yadda yadda, yadda. Koontz must get royalties from Crayola.
Once again, he uses a dog as a featured star but this dog lacks the charisma and talent of his dogs in some of his great past novels (i.e.-Watchers). This dog, an Irish Wolfhound and his master seem bewildered about the happenings around them. Mainly, the appearance of two unusual creatures which Koontz describes endlessly without ever creating a true vision for the reader.
Then, he throws in a lunatic, a card counter, a vet, a killer and various supporting characters who come and go and never create a real sense of being.
Endless dialog about chaos theory, man's fear of new evolution and plot lines that wander to and fro without a worthy climax and you have a total mess.
I read every Koontz book and often buy them. I am glad I did not buy this novel because it bored the heck out of me when confusion and boredom reigned.
His last book "Relentless" was much better and he has written lots of great stuff but this is not worthy of this fine writer. If this were the first Koontz book I ever read, I would probably dismiss him as a confused writer unable to create interest. It's not. So let's hope for better work next time and let's hope that young Koontz readers check out his past stuff and dismiss "Breathless" as an ugly hiccup in his writing career.

Breathless by Dean Koontz is a stunningly beautiful story that stresses the divisions we find in our world between light and dark, beauty and ugliness, and redemption and damnation. While Koontz is not a stranger to using animals in his stories, Breathless stands everything else on its head.

Grady Adams is a simple man; a carpenter/craftsman who manages to provide for himself and his Irish Wolf-hound, Merlin, while working out of a converted barn. Living a relatively isolated life in the mountains of Colorado is perfect for Grady. One day, while exploring Grady stumbles onto two creatures unlike any he has ever seen. At first, he is unable to approach them before they flee. Over a few days though, he gains their trust and, the story is on. In time Homeland Security and the Army become forces that Grady and his friends must deal with. Let's just say the story is captivating and once you're hooked you won't regret picking up the book.

I hate to use the phrase "typical Koontz" when discussing any of his works because that implies every story is the same. One thing is for sure that over the years Koontz's books have been anything but typical. I know this is a cliché but most of his recent books seem to open to the reader like you peel an onion. One layer after the other is revealed until the climax is reached. You may even tear up a long the way.

Breathless is a great story packed with suspense, great character development, and fantastic descriptions.

Long time readers appreciate Koontz's ability to tell a good story and also touch the reader in a special way. Many of his stories are spiritual without being spiritual. That makes no sense at all, except it is true, at least for this reader.

Once again Dean Koontz has written a wonderful story. I highly recommend.

Peace always.

My first clue to this book's potential trouble was the lack of reviews from respected literary sources. Despite that, I was ready for "Breathless" to break the trend of formulaic books that Koontz has put out over the past few years. From "The Husband" to "The Good Guy" to "Relentless," it has seemed we were getting different variations of the same story. This, I thought, might break that mold.

It breaks the mold, all right. It dives deeply into the chaos theory that some of Koontz's characters defend. "Breathless" starts with the same feel as "The Taking," showing mysterious events and creating a palpable sense of intrigue. We meet Grady Adams and his dog, Merlin, as they start spotting some inexplicable white creatures in the woods. Through the eyes of Camilia Rivers, we see horses and even goats start acting in odd ways. And we meet a coldhearted killer named Henry Rouvroy, who is more than he seems. We are introduced to others, as well, and the book begins to feel more like a series of short stories than a cohesive unit. Nevertheless, I kept waiting for things to swing around, to sprint into action.

With thirty pages left, though, I was still wondering when this chaos theory would gel into something like a full-length novel. The plot threads that at first seemed to be winding toward something deep, instead meandered, tangled, and knotted. The characters' goals and motives remained nebulous through most of the story, and Koontz tacked on a preachy section, as has become his routine of late.

Koontz is an undisputed master of narrative. I like his ideas, his questions, his searching. His dialogue is great. But these pieces must fit together to make a great novel, and this doesn't seem to happen here.

Once again, I am left feeling cheated by the genius that I know Koontz possesses. Please, Mr. Koontz, for the sake of readers who love your writing, give us a story that is wildly imaginative yet cohesive, full of ideas and symbolism without being pedantic. I see the beauty in the chaos, and now I'm begging for you to unwrap it in a truly novel form.

This incredibly disorganized and unconvincing novel won't kill Dean Koontz's successful writing career. But it might sound the death knell for his status as an A-lister. This could be the one that finally drives away his remaining fans still clinging on from his 1980s horror days and even his middle period (circa the Chris Snow novels) and leaves Koontz as a must-read only among his religious and political sympathizers - and of course the golden retriever crowd.

There's almost nothing about it that worked. The human characters were uninteresting and mostly lacked humor. The only exception to that was one newcomer to the book's Colorado setting who experienced some trademark Koontz dark humor shocks. This character's story never went anywhere or linked up with what little overall plot there is, but that's all to the good here. The other major human characters mostly don't interact with each other either, except for the predictable single sensitive male and his female counterpart.

I specified human characters because of course there is a canine one as well, plus two of what I can only think of as Ewoks. They're soft and cuddly and have big soulful eyes. That's how we know they're good! I do wonder that a man of Koontz's age, experience, and religious sensibilities loses all ability for rational thought when it comes to animals - real or imaginary.

I found the pacing of the book extremely annoying. Koontz switches point of view every thousand words or so, which is bad enough as it keeps the reader from ever really settling into a scene. He amplifies this problem by starting a new chapter every time. This relatively short novel had 72 chapters. That's a lot of white space. I would have found it less distracting if he'd for instance kept the chapters to 18 with four sections in each, separated by a blank line is as common.

I had the feeling that either Koontz or the publisher structured the novel the way they did in order to make the finished product seem longer than it is. If Koontz is having trouble writing two novels a year, there's no shame in that. That's a heck of a pace for a novelist to keep up year after year. Maybe he should get together with his editor and restructure his schedule, so that instead of his having to deliver a novel every six months he has whatever time he needs - even if that means he only puts out a book every nine months or once a year.

In any case, I think he'd better take a good hard look at why he's writing. It can't be for the money, so he must still feel he has important things to offer. If so, I'd like to hear some of them - assuming they pertain to the human condition as opposed to the retriever, wolfhound, or Ewok one. The proper study of man is mankind, Dean. I think The Good Guy was the single one of his recent novels that really worked, because it had something true to say about evil and amorality. More Good Guy, fewer cute animals.

given the last few books dean has written, and the reduction in both quality and substance, i am going to write his next book here.

there was this conflicted man who owned this special dog. they met an emotionally bruised woman. something amazing happened. a very evil man, who worked for a secret, paranoid branch of the government did some psychotic stuff. man determines what is valuable in his life. he and the special dog befriend the bruised woman. a lot of political/religious proselitizing is expressed. and all the right-thinking. good people live happily-ever-after.

now, send me $10.

this has become koontz's mode of expression over his last few books. generic characters. writing so concise, it's incoherent. go nowhere plots that peter out at the end. my attitude toward people and hobbies that don't satisfy??? BE FUN OR BE GONE. SOOO-no more wasted time or money. bye, dean.

First, let me establish myself as a die-hard Koontz fan, having collected all his hardcovers for nearly 30 years. I have been addicted since the early 1980's. Though I haven't always been enamored with his characters (e.g. Odd Thomas ), I have been a constant, appreciative reader. This is my first actual disappointment with one of his novels. Indeed, I am reluctant to call it a "novel," as it appeared to me to be more a collection of short stories...there were multiple characters and plots that never seemed to come together. I kept waiting for the point at which all the separate stories would be related to each other, and their relationship would become clear. This never happened! The two "new" creatures were never related to at least three of the characters in other plot lines. Also, each of the plot lines appeared rushed. I am wondering just what it was that I read. If asked to summarize the plot, I would be at a loss.

This really pains me to say but I am done with Koontz. The last few books of his I have read have just been so boring. This one was rushed, boring, out there, with no glue to keep it together. It was several mini stories that give you the hope of something much bigger than is actually delivered. It was if he gave up on it half way through. The man, a dog, and a ghost thing is getting OLD. I'm done wasting money on him. Sorry Koontz I am breaking up with you. I know it hurts us both, but it's for the better good.

This is my first review, so excuse my disjointed ramblings ....
I have read most all of DK's books, and this one really moved me!
Moved me to write a review that is! I can't believe anyone
could give this book 5,4, or even 3 "stars".
If there was a "0" to give - this one would deserve it.
I, too, was wondering how all the different (3)subplots were
going to merge with the main story. 75 ....50......30...20 ... pages
left and no "merging" to be had. Then, poof! In the last 20 pages
that I read, this jumbled mess and explanations that, to this day,
I couldn't tell anyone what the heck happened. I read them,
but afterwards didn't even know what the heck I just read.
Here are a few words that describe those last twenty
pages: preposterous unbelievable what? huh?

This was one of the worst books that I have read.

To all DK fans out there, do yourself a BIG favor and avoid
reading this one - go back and read Watchers again

Ughh