Very thoughtful and productive book. Though listing both Mormon and Evangelical contributors as co-authors, it definitely appears slanted a bit more to an evangelical audience. I don't state this to be critical, as frankly, though a Mormon myself, I have no problem with that undertone existing. But it does tinge the after-affect, with a slightly more pro-evangelical tilt than a truly bi-partisan approach would have achieved. For example, near the end Reverend Johnson states 5 "principles" which, given he is their author, take a somewhat paternalistic approach to tolerance, as if the unspoken assumption is that his evangelical position is of course the "true" one, yet gracious enough to be tolerant of the "less" true Mormon position. I found that slightly condescending, which is the main reason I marked the book down 1 star. Obviously, Bob Millet, the Mormon theologian could have pronounced the exact same 5 principles, from the position of magnanamous toleration for the evangelical theology. At the end, it felt a bit more like this was Reverend Johnson's book, with Bob Millet as the interviewee. Not a major problem, but left me feeling a bit unsatisfied as I felt a little patted-on-the-head. This was true of the end of the book, but not true of the middle book, where just true open conversation was made with no attempt to monopolize the dialog by either side.
Other than that, this book does what few others even attempt. (With the exception of the Stephen Robinson/Craig Blomberg book "How Wide the Divide".) An unheated, mature, and rationale discussion of two great religious traditions, sans rancor or entrenched one-ups-manship. It's clear these are two honest-in-heart theologians, following in the tradition of great men like Richard Mouw, simply trying to exemplify the maxim; "understand to be understood." They ask questions, opine on their theological positions, and treat each other with respect. The conversation is blunt, without grandiosity or pretense. It is very readible, with large margins and actually a very quick read in spite of 185-page length. It's sad that such an exchange qualifies as such an unusual thing, especially when it would ostensibly seem only the normal "christian" thing to do. I also purchased the DVD "A Mormon & an Evangelical Christian In Conversation" which I haven't watched yet. It features the same two theologians and I look forward to seeing it, but wanted to read the book first. Well done and I hope to see more outreach between the faiths. Perhaps, if the Muslims and Jews could pull this off, we'd see some good results in the Middle East for a change.