Customer Reviews


3 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Forecasting the future has its own archeology, and here is a good guide to it
One of the more alarming mistakes in foresight work is that forecasters don't see themselves as operating within their own world view, and the preconceptions and priorities of their own time. In fact the very idea of foresight - why do it and how to do it - has changed quite markedly through human history. Knowledge of this historiography is of course important in...
Published on March 13, 2009 by Adam Gordon

versus
1 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Not greatly informative, and title is misleading.
This book is almost completely about the history of getting people to accept new ideas and technologies (now old). The author explains little about the past discoveries, but focuses on the process whereby the inventor or discoverer (or their advocate) was finally heard. There is almost no information on the future, only history. Nor was there any focus on future...
Published 20 months ago by Brad Bannister


Most Helpful First | Newest First

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Forecasting the future has its own archeology, and here is a good guide to it, March 13, 2009
This review is from: A Brief History of the Future: How Visionary Thinkers Changed the World and Tomorrow's Trends are 'Made' and Marketed (Paperback)
One of the more alarming mistakes in foresight work is that forecasters don't see themselves as operating within their own world view, and the preconceptions and priorities of their own time. In fact the very idea of foresight - why do it and how to do it - has changed quite markedly through human history. Knowledge of this historiography is of course important in assessing current forecasts. This is why Oona Strathern's A Brief History of the Future is an important book.
The book is hardly brief (at 300 pages) so there's no sense that it's a potted history. And it's not compromised by what one - alas - expects of this kind of setup: pandering to all characters in positive or equal terms. In fact a key value of the book is its clear-headed and plucky judgment of who the key figures are (and who are not) and what their contributions have each been (vs what they might have thought they were). It is also unusually even-handed in balancing US and European inputs. Full review at The Future Savvy Journal blog. - Adam Gordon, Author [Future Savvy: Identifying Trends to Make Better Decisions, Manage Uncertainty, and Profit from Change.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Looking back to leap ahead, October 10, 2007
By 
Nikhilesh Dholakia "T-Nirakar" (Kingston, Rhode Island, USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: A Brief History of the Future: How Visionary Thinkers Changed the World and Tomorrow's Trends are 'Made' and Marketed (Paperback)
From the Oracle of Delphi to Science Fiction fantasies to chilling Cold War to Hot War scenarios, Oona Strathern captures the long history of soothsaying and visualization of the future in this eminently readable book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Not greatly informative, and title is misleading., May 11, 2010
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: A Brief History of the Future: How Visionary Thinkers Changed the World and Tomorrow's Trends are 'Made' and Marketed (Paperback)
This book is almost completely about the history of getting people to accept new ideas and technologies (now old). The author explains little about the past discoveries, but focuses on the process whereby the inventor or discoverer (or their advocate) was finally heard. There is almost no information on the future, only history. Nor was there any focus on future discoveries needed, nor future successful methods of mass change. It should have been titled more along the lines of the history of gaining acceptance of discoveries, nothing of the future.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product