Customer Reviews

Bruce Springsteen: Two Hearts, the Story

5 star:		(4)
4 star:		(3)
3 star:		(4)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

The author of two previous Springsteen bios ("Born To Run" and "Glory Days"), Mr. Marsh has fused the two into a very satisfying history of what may very well be the only rock artist to age with grace and relevance in the public eye, yet maintain his unbreakable bond with his fans.

The first tome covered Bruce's career up to "The River", the second his explosion into the public awareness caused by "Born In The USA".
Now, with some judicious paring and streamlining, Marsh has crafted an account of an impossibly passionate and driven man, who knew as a teenager what he wanted to do, and proceeded against all odds to do exactly that.

The book is inspirational much in the same way Springsteen's music is inspirational. Bruce can somehow evoke universal feelings, or make broad statements, by using precise lyrics with cinematic musical accompaniment. The Springsteen saga from small town New Jersey to international fame (and not insignificantly, back to New Jersey) is not exactly "rags to riches" or "the little engine that could", but it's sure close.

Springsteen the man (as opposed to the musician) is depicted not as a saint, perhaps, but certainly virtuous and often quietly heroic. Allowing for a modicum of journalistic variability, the accounts surrounding his initial entry into the "music business", the career-stalling lawsuit of the mid-seventies, and the relatively "brave" idea to release a demo tape of haunting tunes essentially "as is", all create an image of an artist "sticking to his guns".
Springsteen feels authentic, fresh...real. His efforts towards the needy, the Veterans, the homeless, the hungry were not promotional gimmicks, but clearly based on the belief that "nobody wins unless everybody wins", an idea found throughout the book. Too many people talk about doing something. Here we have somebody who simply went out and did it. It's presented not in any glorifying manner, more as a personal mission. There but for the grace of God go I. I can help so I shall. It's heartening to know that someone who's such a mythic figure to many, actually may really be a decent guy.

Each of his albums, from "Greetings..." to the massive "Live 1975/85" gets a fairly detailed history...what was happening not only with Bruce, but with America and with the music business at the time...providing sufficient context for the music. The peek into their genesis is fascinating...how albums are constructed, what "works" and what doesn't...even the difficulties of the actual record cutting process or creating an album cover...I ate it up with a spoon. "Integrity" is another word that keeps coming to mind while reading this. Bruce always seems to maintain his, and no more so than during his concerts. Live shows, both here and abroad, illustrate the uncommon bond between Bruce and his audience, and here Marsh nearly places you in the arena. He does an amazing job of making the performance come alive on the page. If you have ANY familiarity at all with Springsteen, it'll play like film in your head.

The E Street band gets a lot of print, but I could have used more. They come across as characters drawn vividly with few brushstrokes, but I would have loved to know more about the Big Man, the Professor, Phantom Dan, the Mighty One and Miami Steve. The names alone conjure up images of a rock n' roll group of superheroes.

An enormous part of Bruce's history took place from circa "Tunnel of Love" to "The Rising", much of it I personally would love to hear more about. It's all crammed into a paltry 24 pages at the end of a dense 677 page book. It should be another whole book. I feel "The Rising" album and tour are not given enough credit. They're short-changed, underplayed. I think time will prove to be more generous, and future editions of the book will more than likely amplify what's written here.

So I guess my complaint is that I wish the book was longer, which if you think about it, may be the highest possible compliment I can pay.

Two Hearts combines two previously released books 'Born to Run' and 'Glory Days', adds a few new introductions and one more closing chapter covering the last 16 years (all in about 28 pages). If the title said 1972-1986, then this truly would be a 'Definitive' biography. But it's cover is extremely misleading and I would caution ANYONE interested in anything from Tunnel of Love forward to look elsewhere. Marsh truly cheats the reader by ignoring or glossing over such subjects as 1)the breakup of Bruce's first marriage, even though it basically is the subject of 'Tunnel of Love'. 2) His infidelities and the impact that it had on his fan base 3) breaking up with the E Street Band 4) The less than satisfactory shows in 1992/1993 and 5) the dual release of Human Touch/Lucky Town. These subjects deserve to have been addressed, especially by someone who has the access that Marsh has had and to truly round out the story.

Marsh's book often goes way overboard in its praise of Bruce's music, while rarely if ever addressing some of the common complaints many have had with the repetitive nature and theme's found therein. It would have made a much better book if some balance had been brought to the subject.

Its still a worthwhile read, but it only tells half the story. Perhaps someday we can get the rest.

First off, the positives. 1) Dave Marsh is an excellent writer who clearly loves his subject -- Bruce Springsteen -- and is great at bringing the concerts to life; 2) Springsteen himself is a fascinating figure, almost too good to be true (except that he's not!); 3) Many of Bruce's songs are brilliant, and Marsh does an excellent job exploring the themes -- life, death, movement, stasis, hope, despair, love, loneliness/alienation, faith, emptiness -- that run like a river through them all; 4) Despite obviously loving Springsteen and his music, Marsh rarely if ever sinks into the hero worship and "hagiography" he has been incorrectly accused of.

Now, the negatives. The book claims to be "The Definitive Biography, 1972-2003," yet it barely covers anything after 1986. Hey, that's 18 years ago; has so little happened in Bruce's life and music since then? In addition, I found the book to be a little repetitive at times, particularly in the introductory sections. But the most important criticism I've got is that, with the exception of "The Rising," the book largely ignores Springsteen's post-"Born in the USA" career: "Tunnel of Love," "Lucky Town," "Human Touch," "The Ghost of Tom Joad." These are all basically glossed over in a rushed, short, final couple of chapters. As much as I hate to say it, this makes me suspect that the publication of "Two Hearts," and its release just in time for the Christmas shopping season 2003, was in large part an excuse (by Dave Marsh?) to make a few bucks and to cash in on the post-"Rising" surge of interest in Springsteen. OK, sure, this IS America and it IS a MARKET economy, but I thought the whole book was about how Springsteen -- and by extension, Dave Marsh, his #1 fan and biographer -- only put something out there in the marketplace when it was ready from an ARTISTIC point of view. From that perspective, this book, which is really two previous books plus one quickie update covering 1987-2003, wasn't quite ready. Still, it's great for what it is, and Bruce Springsteen truly is an American hero worth emulating. At the least, it made me run to my stereo to listen to "Nebraska," "Live 1975-1985," and the rest with a heightened awareness of what it's all about. Bruce Springsteen truly is one of the greatest American artists ever; a national treasure to be listened to, appreciated, and savored, not the least in these difficult, dangerous, and frightening times.

As has been noted (but understandably wasn't noticed by someone who gave it to me for Christmas), this book is basically a reprint of Marsh's classic Springsteen biographies "Born to Run" and "Glory Days". For detailing the early and mid-phases of Bruce's career, you'll find no finer works. Marsh is an excellent, very readable writer who clearly loves music and his books' subject. Marsh clearly helped document and establish some of Springsteen's deserved reputation as a genuinely decent human being and arguably one of the greatest figures in rock and roll. But Bruce's career didn't end in 1986, which is where the vast marjority of this book stops. To me, "Tunnel of Love" is Springsteen's most interesting album and tour, but only a few pages are devoted to it. I'm not interested in the details of Bruce's failed first marriage, but it clearly played a major role in the artistic formation of what I consider to be his best album. I understand why Marsh doesn't write a third volume- he's too personally tied to Springsteen, being married to Barbara Carr of Bruce's management organization. There's a very touching story about how Springsteen performed at the funeral of Ms. Carr's daughter- clearly, Bruce means more to Marsh and his family than simply the subject of a rock and roll biography. However, I'd still love to read his thoughts on Springsteen's life and career since the heyday of "Born in the USA", highly subjective though they may be. There are some brief introductions and updates that bring us up to the release of The Rising, but nothing is written in any great detail. So to suggest that this is a comprehensive biography of Springsteen up until 2003 is simply inaccurate. If you already own other editions of "Born to Run" and "Glory Days", I see absolutely no reason to buy this edition for anything other than collectability. If, however, you've never read those books, then by all means pick up this edition. There's a great, if incomplete story to be told.

First, Kindle: for whatever reason, this book did not translate particularly well to Kindle. About 70% of the time that Clarence Clemons is referenced, his name comes up as "demons" instead of Clemons. Also, whether it's poor editing in the original or a poor conversion to Kindle, at one point one of Springsteen's most popular albums comes up as "Orn to Run." Amateurish.

Second, the content: To me, too much of the content was culled from newspaper articles, magazine articles, or was transcribed from Springsteen's live shows. I get the sense the author had little to no access to Springsteen, or those close to Springsteen, in spite of his Rolling Stone credentials and personal friendship with Jon Landau, and without that access decided to take what was out there and compile it. I got about a third of the way through and realized it just wasn't very good or very well-written, but I decided to muddle through in hopes that there was something redeeming to come. Unfortunately, there was not. (And holy crap, how many pages were devoted to the food banks and charities on the Born in the USA tour? So completely and unnecessarily excessive!)

Now that I've read this fantastic book on my Kindle, I need to purchase the print version just so I can read and enjoy it without all the conversion to Kindle errors - most notable Clarence Clemons constantly referred to as Clarence demons. This is the first book that I've purchased for my Kindle that I did not enjoy reading on my Kindle.

An eye-opening read for every level of Springsteen fan. Take everything you know about him and put it aside. This book opens doors you walked by in the past. Marsh's insights are superb. I especially appreciated the coverage depth of Bruce's early years. The author could have simply analyzed the works for face value. Instead he brings a great deal more to the table, blending first-hand accounts into colorful commentary, bringing the reader closer to Bruce's complex & mysterious creative circle.

Some believe the more recent Springsteen albums were short-changed with only a few sections devoted to their content. I highly disagree. Marsh could have easily inked another 300+ pages. Although doing so would have created more of a chronicle than a character study. The most important aspects of Bruce's life and how they solidified his musical abilities are given full attention. Those who question Marsh's style simply misinterpret his intentions. Springsteen continues his success today because of the paths he's traveled through "Born in the U.S.A." Albums produced thereafter may have incorporated new subjects & recording methods, but did not play a groundbreaking role in his abilities. They were simply extensions of his life experiences. Personal styles may change, but Bruce will always remain true to his roots.

"Two Hearts" will only complement an appreciation for Springsteen as an incredibly talented musician and a highly-centered man.

...not so definitive..but like it is written...it will have to do til Bruce writes his own autobiography. The author expounds on all of Bruce's life and albums up to Born in the USA...but writes very little about Tunnel of Love (his best in my opinion) and completely ignores Lucky Town and Human Touch. The book is supposed to be about Bruce and not necessarily the E St Band. Dave Marsh is a good writer but because these albums weren't major hits doesn't mean they are not part of his story.

I also did not care for his assessment of other artists....Linda Ronstadt for example. His opinions have no place in a biography.

To paraphrase the blurb on the backcover, 'until Springsteen writes his own story this will have to do.' The cover is very misleading as it states this is the definitve story of Springsteen and that it covers his career up thru 2003. What it really covers is everything thru about 1987 and then a few add on pages by Marsh at the end (and I do mean few) to pretend it's updated thru The Rising. I doubt that any ardent Springsteen fan will learn anything about Bruce they didn't already know. This reads more like a person who followed Springsteen around the world from Born to Run on and then wrote about his experiences while giving his 'critical' opinions about the music. While Marsh is pretty thorough in his coverage of Springsteen's musical journey there is a lack of personal items that would give you better insight into his mind at any given time. I for one would rather hear those things from Bruce himself if he ever decides to go that route so I can't be too critical of Marsh for that. But at times it seemed obvious to me that Marsh's longtime friendship with Springsteen gets in the way of writing a more interesting and detailed story.

Dave Marsh is certainly a bias writer, but who better to write this tribute to Bruce than a friend. I loved it.