18 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
How to read the suttas critically, December 13, 2009
This review is from: What the Buddha Thought (OXFORD CENTRE FOR BUDDHIST STUDIES MONOGRAPHS) (Paperback)
This book is a terrific read for anyone who is interested in coming to a fresh understanding of not just what the Buddha thought, but the way his mind worked. It demonstrates how and why one should read the suttas critically. Gombrich is not a Buddhist himself, but has been a professor of Sanksrit and Pali at Oxford in England for decades. This book can serve, as well, as an overview of what the Buddha taught, but as the title indicates, it's more about what and how the Buddha thought -- which is often in metaphors. The author gives evidence for several ways in which the suttas have been misunderstood when we have interpreted the words literally, shorn of their context in poking fun at Brahmins and Vedic beliefs. He covers self-as-process; fire as an analogy; and presents the argument that Theravadin Buddhism has misinterpreted a playful metaphor about "being with Brahma" in a way that has caused us to lose understanding of the Buddha's teaching that development of the four immeasurables (lovingkindness, compassion, sympathetic joy and equanimity) can be a path to nirvana. The book supports the traditional Buddhist view that the Buddha taught karma as part of a literal ("after the breakup of the body") rebirth process and Gombrich even argues that without this, the Buddha's philosophical system falls apart. The evidence he presents on this falls far short of convincing me, but since the Professor has not had a chance to practice what the Buddha taught and has studied Buddhism primarily from the Theravadin perspective it's not surprising that he misses the many ways in which the evidence he presents throughout the book supports an alternative understanding. Overall this is a wonderful read, both as a bare introduction to Buddhism, to the Buddha's thought, and to the issues of Buddhist scholarship. Highly recommended.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Elephant burgers and the path to Jesus, February 7, 2011
In "What the Buddha Thought" Pali-Sanskrit scholar Richard Gombrich demonstrates why understanding the Buddha's message requires first understanding something about the culture in which the Buddha taught.
Using the example of an advertisement for a "jumbo hamburger," Gombrich illustrates the pitfalls in our own common metaphor. We all know the "jumbo" claim is to largeness, but jump ahead two thousand years and we may find that scholars have not only missed out on the possible pun intended by the advertisement writer, but may also have attributed a literal interpretation distorting the historical reality. Imagine a 22nd century anthropologist claiming on the basis of the above advertisement that fast food chains served elephant meat sandwiches. These are the kinds of difficulties facing those who wish to unlock the message of the Buddha as preserved in the Pali cannon.
In fact this kind of example is more simple and straightforward than many of those Gombrich discusses, which depend on a knowledge of abstract concepts (such as consciousness, mind, nirvana) in propositions often conveyed through metaphor (fire for consciousness, for example) in ancient languages (Pali and Sanskrit) and presented to the reader in English. If it does nothing else, the book will impress on you the monumentally difficult task of the modern scholar of Buddhism.
Gombrich stresses at several points throughout the text that we can make sense of Buddha's teaching only within the framework of his audience. What did they know or believe about the world? How could the Buddha best relate his message to these people? Just as a modern western Buddhist might make a presentation using words and concepts borrowed from Christian theology and cosmology, so too the Buddha borrowed from Brahmanical sources. To understand one requires some understanding of the other.
One important example Gombrich covers in some detail is the Tevijja Sutta, in which the Buddha converses with two young brahmins about the path to salvation. Using their own ideas and terminology, the Buddha assures them that in following his rules of morality and conduct and in practicing kindness, compassion, empathetic joy and equanimity they can achieve the qualities of Brahma and thereby join Brahma at death. Essentially, the Buddha is telling them they don't have to abandon their spiritual goals, as if telling modern Christians that if they practice the Buddha's method they can achieve the qualities of Jesus and even join Jesus when they die. The young brahmins are convinced and enter the Buddha's monastic community. Years later a scholar puzzles over this sutta and is convinced that since the Buddha promised these young men, there must be a plane of Brahmas somewhere in the Buddhist cosmology. And so one was invented - and exists to this day. Gombrich argues that the Buddha was simply being practical. He used metaphors and ideas to which his audience could relate. In this instance Gombrich sees the metaphor as quite crude, as Brahma the creator god, rather than as brahma the substance of the universe. More importantly for the Buddha (and for us), it didn't matter that these young men imagined they were going to meet Brahma; what was important was that they practiced morality and loving kindness. Unfortunately for the sangha, the literal interpretation led to the conclusion that practicing kindness, compassion, empathetic joy and equanimity (known as the brahma-vihara) could take a practitioner only as far as the Brahma plane. Gombrich believes that the Buddha's message was that practicing the brahma-vihara was itself a path to enlightenment.
There are other such case studies in this text, and I'm still puzzling over some of them, even after reading through selected sections twice. Gombrich claims in the introduction that the book is intended for a general audience familiar with the basics of Buddhism, but the water gets pretty deep pretty quickly. Nevertheless, this an enlightening book that will enrich the view of anyone interested in Buddhist studies. Those who haven't yet might like to start their reading with
How Buddhism Began, an earlier volume by the same author introducing much the same themes (with different examples) and to which Gombrich refers on more than a few occasions.
For a couple of academic reviews of "What the Buddha Thought" search online for:
1. Dhivan Thomas Jones in Volume 5 of the Western Buddhist Review
2. Jay L. Garfield in Volume78: Issue3 of the Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Vital context for the teachings of the Buddha, November 8, 2009
This review is from: What the Buddha Thought (OXFORD CENTRE FOR BUDDHIST STUDIES MONOGRAPHS) (Paperback)
A distinguished scholar of the Pali Canon, the earliest texts about the Buddha's teaching, has turned a series of public lectures he gave into the best summary of the context of those teachings. Only by understanding the metaphors and thoughts of the times can one apppreciate what the Buddha was saying--and *not* saying. As one who has studied these texts in translation for some time, I found it extremely valuable. Highly recommended.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No