From Library Journal
Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon, was an outstanding scientist in 18th-century France with a flair for publicity and grand public debates on a wide variety of topics now called natural science. An extremely influential figure in Enlightenment science, he wrote the System of Nature, a 36-volume text that was the most widely collected work of the period; even more copies were sold than the works of Voltaire and Rousseau. In fact, Buffon began a significant amount of research that eventually led to Darwin's theory of evolution. Just as today scientists tend to look down on popularizers of their specialty such as Carl Sagan, Buffon was derided by his fellow scientists, and interest in his work soon waned. This study by the late Roger, who taught at Cornell and the University of Virginia as well as the Sorbonne, is fun to read and presents a balanced view of Buffon's life and work. The reader will also learn a lot about Enlightenment science. Otis Fellows's Buffon (Twayne, 1972) pales in comparison. Highly recommended for all public and academic libraries.?Eric D. Albright, Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. Lib., Durham, N.C.
Copyright 1997 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Copyright 1997 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Kirkus Reviews
A dry yet thorough life of the Enlightenment philosopher and naturalist Georges-Louis Leclerc, comte de Buffon (170788). Buffon was, according to the late French historian Roger, a man who loved money, power, and women, and who acquired all in great quantity through much intrigue. Yet Roger drops the scientist-as-James-Bond frame almost immediately to recount at great length the intellectual ferment of the time--and that is far from an exciting read. Roger presupposes of his readers a background in the life sciences, and he writes fluently of Buffon's contributions to the nascent theory of ecosystems, to embryology and mineralogy, and even to theology. Roger also turns up a few lesser achievements, among them Buffon's invention of a ``burning mirror'' that would focus sunlight on flammable objects, a mad scientist's dream come true. (Buffon never put this weapon to use, but his method of constructing concave mirrors is still used today.) But too much of Roger's text is given over to discussing the minutiae of Buffon's arguments with other scientists (in which Buffon was often wrong) and not enough to analyzing the significance of his discoveries and theories. Roger also bows rather too deeply in the direction of psychohistory. ``What is striking today, more so even than Buffon's daring or his mistakes, is his inability to realize his ambitions,'' he writes. ``Was he scrupulous in his methods or lacking in his imagination?'' Roger never really volunteers an opinion, although he treats us to innumerable episodes of Buffon's wrestling with many demons. More detailed explication of Buffon's real contributions to evolutionary theory--Roger rightly points out his influence on Darwin--and other sciences would have been welcome in the place of so much emphasis on his shortcomings, for no scientist's work remains current for long. (28 b&w illustrations, 2 tables, not seen) -- Copyright ©1997, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.
