| ||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The best out there, but not without flaws,
By
This review is from: The Buildings of Charleston: A Guide to the City's Architecture (Hardcover)
I am a committed amateur architectural historian, and I bought this book immediately upon its publication. It's a fine book, and an exhaustive, encyclopedic effort. This is as close to a complete modern survey of Charleston buildings you will find, but there are some things potential readers should know:First, the book is REALLY limited to Charleston city. Don't come here looking for excursions to local plantations, churches and gardens. The buildings are all located within the city limit, and mostly south of Marion Square. Second, inexplicably, Jon has excluded a section of Tradd Street (the important 60 block) that includes some of the most important surviving structures of the "Grand Modell." The magnificent 1731 Jacob Motte House, at 61 Tradd Street, is absent from the survey! What happened here? Third, the author has not hidden his revisionist agenda by intentionally "post-dating" many of the oldest structures in the city. The dating of structures is still very much about personal interpretation and opinion, since a definitive and universal standard has not been published or accepted. This, unfortunately, is a trend in all of architectural history: Buildings are rarely found to be OLDER than popular knowledge, but only newer. Some of the revision can be properly attributed to dendrochronology, but in the case of this book, more often than not, it is simply the intuition of the author and his rejection of "popular" knowledge. So you'll be disturbed to learn that the old colonial house you thought was built in 1740 was "probably" built in 1790. There are many such date revisions in this book. Frequently, architectural historians are far too ready to dismiss public perception and common secondary sources, particular when that perception comes from ancient oral history rather than the [often incomplete] written record, or misaligns with the intuition of the historian. This is a good book. It's a relatively complete survey, printed in a familiar AIA-style format that includes brief entries and small monochrome photographs. Remember, as quickly as restoration occurs in Charleston, this book is getting a bit on the side of old. A new edition would be a real treat, and will eventually become a necessity. Jon, fill in those holes!
7 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An absolute must if you love architecture and Charleston.,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Buildings of Charleston: A Guide to the City's Architecture (Hardcover)
Mr. Poston has done an excellent and exhaustive job with this book. To my knowledge it is the most comprehensive compilation to date. As well as photographs of the houses plans are also shown for many. A 9+ only because I'm reluctant to say that the "perfect" book has ever been published.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Complete book,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Buildings of Charleston: A Guide to the City's Architecture (Hardcover)
Probably one of the most complete book of Charleston Architecture written. Interesting reading for those who have a passion for the structures of the South.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|