Bully Boy: The Truth About Theodore Roosevelt's Legacy and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy Used
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: (HARDCOVER) The book shows normal wear and tear. All shipping handled by Amazon. Prime eligible when you order from us!
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Bully Boy: The Truth About Theodore Roosevelt's Legacy Hardcover – August 8, 2006

13 customer reviews

See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
$3.89 $0.01
"Please retry"

Dancing with the Devil in the City of God
"Dancing with the Devil in the City of God"
A deeply reported and beautifully written biography of the seductive and chaotic city of Rio de Janeiro from prizewinning journalist Juliana Barbassa. Learn more

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Powell, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, has made a name for himself writing provocative studies of presidents (FDR's Folly and Wilson's War). In this biased, unpersuasive account, Powell argues that virtually every plank of Teddy Roosevelt's Progressive agenda—including trust-busting, regulation of food and drugs, and the income tax (which Powell describes as "blood money") was a disaster. He sees Roosevelt as a dangerous tyrant who sought to expand the power of the executive office in order to promote his own interests. Powell's libertarian politics color almost every page of this study. To wit, his critique of Roosevelt's conservationism: "By establishing federal control over so much U.S. land, he defied the prevailing American view that land use decisions were best made by private individuals who had a stake in improving the value of their property." Powell also turns his guns on muckraking reporter Jacob Riis, remembered for his journalistic exposés of urban poverty. Powell says that instead of unmasking poverty, Riis should have asked "whether the poor were better off" in his day than they had been in the past, then approvingly quotes Thomas Hobbes's description of life as "poor, nasty, brutish, and short." This is irresponsible revisionism at its worst. (Aug. 8)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From Booklist

Powell takes Theodore Roosevelt to task, criticizing the historical plaudits attached to the Rough Rider's presidency. Flowing from a free-market perspective, Powell scores TR's trust busting, maintaining that monopolies, if they existed at all, were ineffective. TR's support for an income tax, touted as a soak-the-rich scheme, earns Powell's condemnation for its growth into a soak-everybody scheme. The analytical polemic continues with TR's creation of food and drug inspectorates, bureaucracies Powell flays as unnecessary since food processors had market incentives to keep food safe. Nor is TR-the-conservationist safe from Powell's pikes as the author argues Roosevelt damaged rather than preserved the environment. And as for TR's Big Stick, that was an original sin that opened the door to America's foreign interventions in the twentieth century. Readable, forceful, and opinionated, Powell's third presidential jeremiad (after Wilson's War, 2005, and FDR's Folly, 2003) should ignite debate between supporters and opponents of big government. Gilbert Taylor
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 336 pages
  • Publisher: Crown Forum; 1St Edition edition (August 8, 2006)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0307237222
  • ISBN-13: 978-0307237224
  • Product Dimensions: 6.5 x 1.2 x 9.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (13 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #324,000 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

108 of 119 people found the following review helpful By vnrooster on September 4, 2006
Format: Hardcover
In FDR's Folly, Jim Powell relied heavily on the work of empirical economists to draw conclusions about FDR and his policies. While contrary to other historians who have largely ignored economic studies of the great depression, Powell evaluated FDR and the New Deal based on the actual outcomes and consequences that they produced. In a similar vein, Powell documents the policies of TR in his new book, Bully Boy, and concludes that they largely did more harm than good. Specifically, Powell discusses the following in Bully Boy:

* How TR's regulations, tariff and "trust busting" policies harmed consumers

* How TR's foreign policy undermined the Monroe Doctrine and set precedents for future intervention in conflicts with no clear threat to U.S. security

* How TR's Meat Inspection Act and Pure Food and Drugs Act were used predominately as special interest legislation and set the foundation for the future FDA "drug lag," which has killed thousands

* How TR's conservation policies were counterproductive

* How TR's tax policies help to establish the federal income tax

While Powell's assessment of TR cannot be found in most history books, Bully Boy is well researched and documented with approximately 29 pages of notes and a 21 page bibliography. I enjoyed the book and would recommend it to people that either love or loathe TR.

Many people will obviously disagree with Powell's conclusions or will support the consequences and precedents of TR's policies that appear to trouble Powell. I look forward to reading both the positive and negative reviews of this book. My hope is that those who disagree with Powell can provide more substance than the ad hominem attacks (e.g. "smut," "garbage," "reactionary claptrap") and other rhetorical fallacies that were the main locus of criticism for FDR's Folly and Wilson's War
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
24 of 25 people found the following review helpful By Keith Heapes VINE VOICE on March 28, 2009
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
After reading Jim Powell's book FDR's Folly, I wasn't sure I wanted to follow that one by reading Bully Boy, Powell's critique of Theodore Roosevelt's political life. So, I thought I'd give my brain a rest and just check it out of the library and do a mild overview. Unfortunately, you can't read a Powell book like that, so after reading just the introduction, I was hooked.

Powell's view point in Bully Boy is similar to that in FDR's Folly, but a little less detailed. He provides a strong chronological look at T. Roosevelt's entire political career, with his major focus on its consequences, especially during Roosevelt's presidency.

One area that evidently eluded me during my years in school was the fact that T. Roosevelt was a Republican (pretty much in name only), but his politics were radical, liberal and progressive. As a result, he believed in a huge, powerful central government, led by a president who has a lot of individual power at his disposal. Roosevelt felt America's involvement in war was the noblest of endeavors, and as an aggressive expansionist president, continuously involved the American military in senseless, imperialistic takeovers of foreign governments like the Hawaiian Islands, Panama, Cuba, the Philippines, and even eyed countries in South America, even though not a single one of these military actions involved the national security of the United States. And many, if not most of these conflicts were done without Constitutionally mandated congressional approval. As the president, Roosevelt felt he had the power and the right to commit American military forces anywhere he deemed them necessary, and without anyone's approval.

Powell asserts that Roosevelt's famous "trust-buster" reputation was a sham.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful By A. C. Anderson on November 29, 2010
Format: Hardcover
For a book that I just happened to pick up, Jim Powell's book was a very excellent read. Theodore Roosevelt is often looked at as one of the most vibrant, enthralling presidents. This picture often gives people the impression that he was the quintessential American man. Although he was a very interesting person, his political views severely crippled a thriving democratic republic. Powell points out that Roosevelt's ideas were as socialistic, if not more so, than his cousin's FDR. I highly recommend this book to anyone who wants to know more about the roots of why America is in its current position.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Jim Peschke on January 22, 2011
Format: Hardcover
If you've always wondered what happened between the great laissez-faire post-war expansion of the late 19th century and the nanny-state socialism of the 20th, Bully Boy is for you. Not that TR is fully responsible, but he certainly paved the way. From destructive international intervention to stifling regulation of business, TR's systematic reduction of America's freedom, her true source of greatness, is well documented in Bully Boy. Powell's language is easy to understand and not unduly boring. If the size of the book intimidates you, know that a good portion of the back is filled with references. While no amount of reference material will silent those who come to Amazon to provide negative reviews of books they haven't read, the information is persuasive for those struggling to cast free the shackles of pro-TR indoctrination. A good read and not a huge investment of time. If nothing else, Bully Boy provides an interesting glimpse into a pivotal time in American history, unencumbered by political correctness.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews